Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6

Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED Flex) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Periprocedural outcomes and first-year angiographic results

Pages
1640–1646
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mortality rate was 4.3%.Conclusion: Our experience shows that the applicability and safety of the renewed delivery system provided by PED Flex for improvingdevice apposition and opening has been proven with one-year angiographic and clinical follow-up results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED Flex) is a new updated version of the PED classic that incorporates anew delivery system to allow facilitation of stent deployment, resheathing, and removal of the capture coil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluated the PEDFlex in terms of the technical aspects of the procedure and first-year follow-up results.Materials and methods: This retrospective study involved prospectively collected data from May 2015 to August 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mortality rate was 4.3%.Conclusion: Our experience shows that the applicability and safety of the renewed delivery system provided by PED Flex for improvingdevice apposition and opening has been proven with one-year angiographic and clinical follow-up results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED Flex) is a new updated version of the PED classic that incorporates anew delivery system to allow facilitation of stent deployment, resheathing, and removal of the capture coil. This study evaluated the PEDFlex in terms of the technical aspects of the procedure and first-year follow-up results.Materials and methods: This retrospective study involved prospectively collected data from May 2015 to August 2017. The primaryendpoint was technical aspects of the procedure, and the secondary endpoint was first-year follow-up results.Results: Forty-nine patients with 59 target intracranial aneurysms were enrolled. Patients’ mean age was 52 years (range 21−71 years),and 31 (63.0%) were female. All aneurysms except for three were unruptured. The mean aneurysm diameter was 8 mm. Forty-sevenpatients with 56 aneurysms were successfully treated. Due to advancement, repositioning, and migration problems, 8 (13.1%) stentswere not deployed and discharged. The total aneurysm occlusion rate was 77.0%. The mortality rate was 4.3%.Conclusion: Our experience shows that the applicability and safety of the renewed delivery system provided by PED Flex for improvingdevice apposition and opening has been proven with one-year angiographic and clinical follow-up results.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNÇ, H., UYSAL, E., BULUT, E., TABAKCI, Ö. N., OĞUZ, Ş. (2022). Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED Flex) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Periprocedural outcomes and first-year angiographic results. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 1640–1646. https://ajindex.com/articles/609991

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year followup results. Journal of Neurosurgery 2017
  2. 127 (1): 81-88. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311 2. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafé A et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2015
  3. 36 (1): 108-115. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A4111 3. Lin N, Lanzino G, Lopes DK, Arthur AS, Ogilvy CS et al. Treatment of distal anterior circulation aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device: A US multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2016
  4. 79 (1): 14-22. doi: 10.1227/ NEU.0000000000001117 4. Jiang B, Paff M, Colby GP, Coon AL, Lin LM. Cerebral aneurysm treatment: modern neurovascular techniques. Stroke and Vascular Neurology 2016
  5. 1 (3): 93-100. doi: 10.1136/svn-2016- 000027 5. Martínez-Galdámez M, Gil A, Caniego JL, Gonzalez E, Bárcena E et al. Preliminary experience with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device: technical note. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2015
  6. 7 (10): 748-751. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011385 6. Duckworth EA, Nickele C, Hoit D, Belayev A, Moran CJ et al. The first North American use of the Pipeline Flex flow diverter. British Medical Journal Case Reports 2015
  7. pii: bcr2014011548. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-011548 7. O’Kelly CJ, Krings T, Fiorella D, Marotta TR. A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interventional Neuroradiology 2010
  8. 16 (2): 133-137. doi: 10.1177/159101991001600204 8. Colby GP, Lin LM, Caplan JM, Jiang B, Huang J et al. Immediate procedural outcomes in 44 consecutive Pipeline Flex cases: the first North American single-center series. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2016
  9. 8 (7): 702-709. doi: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2015-011894 9. Pereira VM, Kelly M, Vega P, Murias E, Yilmaz H et al. New Pipeline Flex device: initial experience and technical nuances. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2015
  10. 7 (12): 920-925. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011347 10. Le EJ, Miller T, Serulle Y, Shivashankar R, Jindal G et al. Use of Pipeline Flex is associated with reduced fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and technical failure compared with the first-generation Pipeline embolization device. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2017
  11. 9 (2): 188-191. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012261 11. Colby GP, Bender MT, Lin LM, Beaty N