Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

Contribution of DECT in detecting serosal invasion of gastric cancer

Pages
782–788
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

During the venous phase, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.876 for the IC of perigastric fat tissue and the P/T ratio,respectively.Conclusion: The IC in the perigastric fat tissue seems to be a reliable indicator for serosal invasion of gastric cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the iodine concentration (IC) of perigastric fat tissue asassessed by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and serosal invasion of gastric cancer.Materials and methods: A total of 41 patients underwent preoperative staging evaluation for gastric cancer using DECT between July2015 and March 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were divided into 2 groups based on pathology results: serosal invasion (stage T4a) and intact serosa(stages T1–T3).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:During the venous phase, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.876 for the IC of perigastric fat tissue and the P/T ratio,respectively.Conclusion: The IC in the perigastric fat tissue seems to be a reliable indicator for serosal invasion of gastric cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the iodine concentration (IC) of perigastric fat tissue asassessed by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and serosal invasion of gastric cancer.Materials and methods: A total of 41 patients underwent preoperative staging evaluation for gastric cancer using DECT between July2015 and March 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on pathology results: serosal invasion (stage T4a) and intact serosa(stages T1–T3). Cutoff values, the diagnostic efficacy of IC in the perigastric fat tissue, and the perigastric fat tissue/tumor (P/T) ratiowere determined.Results: Among the 41 patients, 22 had stage T4a gastric cancer and 19 patients had gastric cancer with a stage lower than T4a. Themean IC of perigastric fat tissue and the P/T ratio were significantly higher in patients with serosal invasion than in those with intactserosa (P < 0.001). During the arterial phase, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.915 and 0.854 for the IC of perigastric fat tissue andthe P/T ratio, respectively. During the venous phase, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.876 for the IC of perigastric fat tissue and the P/T ratio,respectively.Conclusion: The IC in the perigastric fat tissue seems to be a reliable indicator for serosal invasion of gastric cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYTÜRK, M., DANIŞAN, G., KÜPELİ, A., BULUT, E., CANSU, A., GÜNER, A. (2022). Contribution of DECT in detecting serosal invasion of gastric cancer. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 782–788. https://ajindex.com/articles/609986

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Catalano V, Labianca R, Beretta GD, Gatta G, de Braud F, Van Cutsem E. Gastric cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009; 71: 127-164
  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90
  3. Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17: 3077-3079
  4. Yan-Quiroz EF, Díaz-Plasencia JA, Burgos-Chávez OA, Rojas-Vergara AM, Santillán-Medina J, Vilela-Guillén ES, Balmaceda-Fraselle T. Five-year survival prognosis factors in patients with resectable advanced serosa exposed gastric carcinoma. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2003; 23: 184-191
  5. Kim YH, Lee KH, Park SH, Kim HH, Hahn S, Park DJ, Lee HS. Staging of T3 and T4 gastric carcinoma with multidetector CT: added value of multiplanar reformations for prediction of adjacent organ invasion. Radiology 2009; 250: 767-775
  6. Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W, Ryu CW, Kang JH, Park CH, Kim HS, Jung DH. 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: histological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 98-103
  7. Seevaratnam R, Cardoso R, McGregor C, Lourenco L, Mahar A, Sutradhar R, Law C, Paszat L, Coburn N. How useful is preoperative imaging for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of gastric cancer? A meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer 2012; 15: 3-18
  8. Hallinan JT, Venkatesh SK. Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response. Cancer Imaging 2013; 13: 212-227
  9. Fornaro J, Lescka S, Hibbeln D, Butler A, Anderson N, Pache G, Scheffel H, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P. Dualand multi-energy CT: approach to functional imaging. Insights Imaging 2011; 2: 149-159
  10. Silva AC, Morse BG, Hara AK, Paden RG, Hongo N, Pavlicek W. Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. RadioGraphics 2011; 31: 1031-1046
  11. Heye T, Nelson RC, Ho LM, Marin D, Boll DT. Dual-energy CT applications in the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 64-70
  12. Li J, Fang M, Wang R, Dong D, Tian J, Liang P, Liu J, Gao J. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT-based nomograms to predict lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 5241-5249
  13. Zhang XF, Lu Q, Wu LM, Zou AH, Hua XL, Xu JR. Quantitative iodine-based material decomposition images with spectral CT imaging for differentiating prostatic carcinoma from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Acad Radiol 2013; 20: 947-956
  14. Lv P, Lin XZ, Li J, Li W, Chen K. Differentiation of small