Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5

Tracheal intubation with the McGrath MAC X-blade videolaryngoscope in morbidly obese and nonobese patients

Pages
1540–1546
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The hemodynamic changes and postoperative minor complications were also recorded.Results: Body mass index, neck circumference, Mallampati scores, and ASA physical status were statistically higher in the morbidlyobese group (P 35) patients with the aid of some key maneuvers and with a statistically significant but clinically negligible prolongation of theintubation time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Increased body mass index (BMI) and neck circumference are the two independent predictors of difficult intubation.McGrath MAC X-Blade is a videolaryngoscope specifically designed for difficult intubations.Materials and methods: Eighty patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–III undergoing electivesurgery requiring endotracheal intubation were enrolled in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were divided into two groups, nonobese (BMI 35).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The hemodynamic changes and postoperative minor complications were also recorded.Results: Body mass index, neck circumference, Mallampati scores, and ASA physical status were statistically higher in the morbidlyobese group (P 35) patients with the aid of some key maneuvers and with a statistically significant but clinically negligible prolongation of theintubation time.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Increased body mass index (BMI) and neck circumference are the two independent predictors of difficult intubation.McGrath MAC X-Blade is a videolaryngoscope specifically designed for difficult intubations.Materials and methods: Eighty patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–III undergoing electivesurgery requiring endotracheal intubation were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups, nonobese (BMI 35). All patients were intubated with the McGrath MAC X-Blade in both groups. View optimization and tubeinsertion maneuvers such as reinsertion of the device, slight removal of the device, cricoid pressure, handling force, 90° anticlockwiserotation of the tube, use of stylet, and head flexion maneuvers were recorded. Cormack–Lehane grades, insertion times, intubation, andtotal intubation times were recorded. The hemodynamic changes and postoperative minor complications were also recorded.Results: Body mass index, neck circumference, Mallampati scores, and ASA physical status were statistically higher in the morbidlyobese group (P 35) patients with the aid of some key maneuvers and with a statistically significant but clinically negligible prolongation of theintubation time.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, Z. İ., YÖRÜKOĞLU, H. U. (2022). Tracheal intubation with the McGrath MAC X-blade videolaryngoscope in morbidly obese and nonobese patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5, 1540–1546. https://ajindex.com/articles/609930

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J. Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011; 106: 632-642
  2. Dixit A, Kulshrestha M, Mathews JJ, Bhandari M. Are the obese difficult to intubate? British Journal of Anaesthesia 2014; 112: 770-771
  3. Riad W, Vaez MN, Raveendran R, Tam AD, Quereshy FA et al. Neck circumference as a predictor of difficult intubation and difficult mask ventilation in morbidly obese patients: A prospective observational study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2016; 33: 244-249
  4. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R et al. Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 115: 827-848
  5. Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, Drolet P, Duggan LV et al. Canadian Airway Focus Group. The difficult airway with recommendations for management – Part 1 – difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2013; 60: 1089-1118
  6. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251-270
  7. Dhonneur G, Abdi W, Ndoko SK, Amathieu R, Risk N et al. Video-assisted versus conventional tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. Obesity Surgery 2009; 19: 1096-1101
  8. Kelly FE, Cook TM. Seeing is believing: getting the best out of videolaryngoscopy. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2016; 117 Suppl 1: i9-i13
  9. Lafferty BD, Ball DR, Williams D. Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 115: 136-137
  10. Zauter C, Calderon J, Hemmerling TM. Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2015; 114: 181-183
  11. Arslan ZI, Alparslan V, Ozdal P, Toker K, Solak M. Faceto-face tracheal intubation in adult patients: a comparison of the Airtraq, Glidescope and Fastrach devices. Journal of Anesthesia 2015; 29: 893-898
  12. Yumul