Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

Anticipatory effect of execution on observation: an approach using ExoPinch finger robot

Pages
1054–1067
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Anticipatory effect was created with a randomized robot accompany session.Results: The results showed that the observational condition (with or without anticipation) interacted with hemisphere at central channels near somatosensory cortex.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aims to explore the mirror neuron system (MNS) involvement using mu (8–12 Hz)/beta (15–25 Hz) bandsuppression in an action observation-execution paradigm.Materials and methods: Electrophysiological (EEG) data from 16 electrodes were recorded while 8 participants observed video clips ofa hand squeezing a spring.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, the effect of anticipated execution on observation was studied.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Anticipatory effect was created with a randomized robot accompany session.Results: The results showed that the observational condition (with or without anticipation) interacted with hemisphere at central channels near somatosensory cortex.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aims to explore the mirror neuron system (MNS) involvement using mu (8–12 Hz)/beta (15–25 Hz) bandsuppression in an action observation-execution paradigm.Materials and methods: Electrophysiological (EEG) data from 16 electrodes were recorded while 8 participants observed video clips ofa hand squeezing a spring. Specifically, the effect of anticipated execution on observation was studied. For this purpose, a fully actuatedfinger exoskeleton robot was utilized to synchronize observation and execution and to control the execution condition for the participants. Anticipatory effect was created with a randomized robot accompany session.Results: The results showed that the observational condition (with or without anticipation) interacted with hemisphere at central channels near somatosensory cortex. Additionally, we explored the response of MNS on the kinetics features of visual stimuli (hard or softspring).Conclusion: The results showed an interaction effect of kinetics features and hemisphere at frontal channels corresponding nearly tothe ventral premotor cortex area of the brain. The activation of mirror neurons in this area plays a crucial role in observational learning.Based on our results, we propose that specific type of visual stimuli can be combined with the functional abilities of the MNS in the action observation based treatment of hand motor dysfunction of stroke patients to have a positive additional impact.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, B., TURGUT, A. E., ARIKAN, K. B., ZADEH, H. G. M., BAYER, G., GÜNENDİ, Z., ZİNNUROĞLU, M. (2022). Anticipatory effect of execution on observation: an approach using ExoPinch finger robot. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 1054–1067. https://ajindex.com/articles/609924

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. De Vignemont F, Haggard P. Action observation and execution: what is shared? Society for Neuroscience 2008; 3 (3-4): 421-433
  2. Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EE, Meskers CG, Kwakkel, G. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 2017; 31(2): 107-121
  3. Avanzini P, Fabbri-Destro M, Dalla Volta R, Daprati E, Rizzolatti G et al. The dynamics of sensorimotor cortical oscillations during the observation of hand movements: an EEG study. PLoS One 2012; 7 (5): e37534
  4. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, McNamara A et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage, 2007; 36 Suppl 2: T164-173
  5. Small SL, Buccino G, Solodkin A. Brain repair after stroke--a novel neurological model. Nature Reviews Neurology 2013; 9 (12): 698-707
  6. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996; 119 (Pt 2): 593-609
  7. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 1996; 3 (2): 131-141
  8. Pineda JA. Sensorimotor cortex as a critical component of an ‘extended’ mirror neuron system: Does it solve the development, correspondence, and control problems in mirroring? Behavioral and Brain Functions 2008; 4: 47
  9. Gallese V, Goldman A. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998; 2 (12): 493-501
  10. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, Buccino G, Mazziotta JC et al. Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology 2005; 3 (3): e79
  11. Kantak SS, Stinear JW, Buch ER, Cohen LG. Rewiring the brain: potential role of the premotor cortex in motor control, learning, and recovery of function following brain injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012; 26 (3): 282-292
  12. Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Celnik P et al. Formation of a motor memory by action observation. Journal of Neuroscience 2005; 25 (41): 9339-9346
  13. Mattar AA, Gribble PL. Motor learning by observing. Neuron 2005; 46 (1): 153-160
  14. Porro CA, Facchin P, Fusi S, Dri G, Fadiga L. Enhancement of force after action observation: behavioural and neurophysiological studies. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45 (13): 3114-3121
  15. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation