Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6

The Turkish version of the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale: reliability and validity from the viewpoint of balance

Pages
1727–1735
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It also predicts falls, reduced physical activity, balance and mobility problems, and restricted social participation anddaily living activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The factors associated with fall-related self-efficacy should be addressed, especially in the elderly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to determinethe reliability and the validity of the Turkish version of the MFES from the viewpoint of balance.Materials and methods: In this study, 164 participants aged >65 years were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It also predicts falls, reduced physical activity, balance and mobility problems, and restricted social participation anddaily living activities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The factors associated with fall-related self-efficacy should be addressed, especially in the elderly. The Modified FallsEfficacy Scale (MFES) is a simple instrument with good scaling properties and reliability. The aim of the present study was to determinethe reliability and the validity of the Turkish version of the MFES from the viewpoint of balance.Materials and methods: In this study, 164 participants aged >65 years were included. The use of walking aids and assistive devices,history and frequency of falls in the previous year, living environment, and exercise habits were noted. Balance and risk of falling wereassessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). A forward-backward translation procedure was used for the Turkish version of the MFES.Results: None of the 14 items in the MFES were modified. The Turkish version of the MFES has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’salpha, 0.978) and reliability (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.928–0.982), and its construct validity was supported by its ability todistinguish between the groups with respect to fall-risk factors and balance. According to the BBS scores, the high-fall-risk group hadlower MFES scores than the moderate- and low-fall-risk groups (χ2 = 34.153, P = 0.001).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MFES is a sensitive instrument for evaluation of fall-related confidence while carrying out indoor/outdoor activities. It also predicts falls, reduced physical activity, balance and mobility problems, and restricted social participation anddaily living activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, N. Ç., DURAY, M., ŞENOL, H., HÜZMELİ, E. D. (2022). The Turkish version of the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale: reliability and validity from the viewpoint of balance. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 6, 1727–1735. https://ajindex.com/articles/609918

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chan PPW, Chan APS, Lau E, Delbaere K, Chan YH et al. Translation and validation study of the Chinese version Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale-Short Version (Icon-FES). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2018
  2. 77 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.03.008 2. O’Halloran AM, Pénard N, Galli A, Fan CW, Robertson IH et al. Falls and falls efficacy: the role of sustained attention in older adults. BMC Geriatrics 2011
  3. doi: 10.1186/1471- 2318-11-85 3. Jiang XY, Chen Y, Yang ML, Zhu XL. Predictors of Falls Efficacy Scale responses among nursing home residents in China. International Journal of Nursing Sciences 2016
  4. 3 (1): 24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.02.012 4. Pua YH, Ong PH, Clark RA, Matcher DB, Lim EC. Falls efficacy, postural balance, and risk for falls in older adults with falls-related emergency department visits: prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatrics 2017
  5. 17 (1): 1-7. doi: 10.1186/s12877- 017-0682-2 5. World Health Organization. Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO
  6. Mosallanezhad Z, Salavati M, Hellström K, Reza Sotoudeh G, Nilsson Wikmar L et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the modified falls efficacy scale. Disability and Rehabilitation 2011
  7. 33 (25-26): 2446- 2453. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.574774 7. Pollock RD, Martin FC, Newham DJ. Whole-body vibration in addition to strength and balance exercise for falls-related functional mobility of frail older adults: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2012
  8. 26 (10): 915-923. doi: 10.1177/0269215511435688 8. Loft CC, Jones FW, Kneebone II. Falls self-efficacy and falls incidence in community-dwelling older people: the mediating role of coping. International Psychogeriatrics 2018
  9. 30 (5): 727- 733. doi:10.1017/S1041610217002319 9. Toraman A, Yildirim NU. The falling risk and physical fitness in older people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2010
  10. 51 (2): 222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.10.012 10. Delbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H et al. The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age and Ageing 2010
  11. 39 (2): 210-216. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp225 11. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C et al. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy ScaleInternational (FES-I). Age and Ageing 2005
  12. 34 (6): 614-619. doi:10.1093/ageing/afi196 12. Hauer K, Yardl