SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Conflict and Negotiation in Turkish Culture

Türk Kültüründe Çatışma ve Müzakere

Nihal MAMATOĞLU
Hande TASA
Pages
305–335
Publication Date
2019-04-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is supported by TUBİTAK 1001 project no: 113K548 named Conflict and Negotiation in Turkish Culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, cultural comparison topics that emerged in the field of conflict and negotiation literature were handled as a whole, with the aim of to define the conflict and negotiation processes in Turkish culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research sample consists of 71 females and 91 males totally 162 adult employees.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is supported by TUBİTAK 1001 project no: 113K548 named Conflict and Negotiation in Turkish Culture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çatışma · müzakere · kültür

Abstract

In this study, cultural comparison topics that emerged in the field of conflict and negotiation literature were handled as a whole, with the aim of to define the conflict and negotiation processes in Turkish culture. Research sample consists of 71 females and 91 males totally 162 adult employees. The research was structured with 47 open ended questions using face to face interview technique. The obtained data were analyzed using appropriate qualitative and quantitative methods. At the end of the study findings about definition of conflict and negotiation, aims of negotiation, ideal negotiator, risk taking and bluffing, protocol used in negotiation, communication styles in negotiation, time management, benefit orientation, strategies used in conflict and negotiation are discussed in the light of relevant cultural literature. This study is supported by TUBİTAK 1001 project no: 113K548 named Conflict and Negotiation in Turkish Culture.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, çatışma ve müzakere alan yazınında ortaya çıkan kültürel karşılaştırma başlıkları bir bütün olarak ele alınmış; çalışan örneklemi üzerinden Türk kültürüne özgü çatışma ve müzakere süreçlerinin tanımlanması amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma örneklemini 71’i kadın ve 91’i erkek olmak üzere 162 yetişkin çalışan oluşturmaktadır. Yüz yüze görüşme tekniği kullanılarak 47 açık uçlu soru yardımıyla toplanan veriler uygun nitel ve nicel yöntemler yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda, Türk kültüründe çatışma ve müzakerenin nasıl tanımlandığı, hedefleri, ideal müzakereci tanımı, risk ve blöf kullanımına yaklaşım, uygulanan protokol, kullanılan iletişimin tarzı, zaman yönetimi, çıkar yönelimi, duyguların ifadesi, kullanılan stratejiler konularında elde edilen bulgular ilgili alan yazın ışığında tartışılmıştır. Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK 1001 Projesi olarak desteklenen 113K548 numaralı Türk Kültüründe Çatışma ve Müzakere başlıklı araştırma projesi verisinden üretilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAMATOĞLU, N., TASA, H. (2019). Conflict and Negotiation in Turkish Culture. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 305–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/6099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adair, W. L., Brett, J. M., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., Lytl, A. (2004).
  2. Culture and Negotiation Strategy, Negotiation Journal, 20(1), 87–111.
  3. Alon, I., & Brett, J. M. (2007). Perceptions of time and their impact on negotiations in the Arabic‐speaking Islamic world. Negotiation Journal, 23(1), 55-73.
  4. Axtell, R. E. (1990). The do's and Taboos of Hosting International Visitors. New York: Wiley. Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 279-314.
  5. Braganti, N.L., Devine, E. (1992). European Customs and Manners. New York: Meadowbrook. Chai, S. K. (1998). Endogenous ideology formation and economic policy in former colonies. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(2), 263-290.
  6. Cushman, D.P., King, S.S. (1985). National and organizational cultures in conflict resolution: Japan, The United States, and Yugoslavia, Gudykunst W. G. (Ed.), Stewart L. P. (Ed.), Ting-Toomey S. (Ed.). Communication, Culture, and Organizational Processes. içinde: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Dialdin, D., Kopelman, S., Adair, W., Brett, J. M., Okumura, T., Lytle, A. (1999). The Distributive Outcomes of Cross-Cultural Negotiations, DRRC Working Paper. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Elahee, M. N., Kirby, S. L., & Nasif, E. (2002). National culture, trust, and perceptions about ethical behavior in intra‐and cross‐cultural negotiations: An analysis of NAFTA countries. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(6), 799-818.
  7. Elahee, M., & Brooks, C. M. (2004). Trust and negotiation tactics: perceptions about business-to-business negotiations in Mexico. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(6), 397-404.
  8. Foster, D. A. (1992). Bargaining Acrossborders: How to Negotiate Business Successfully Anywhere in the World. New York: McGraw-Hill. Gelfand, M. J., & Christakopoulou, S. (1999). Culture and negotiator cognition: Judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), 248-269.
  9. Gelfand, M. J., & Realo, A. (1999). Individualism-collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 721-736.
  10. Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. London, Weidenfield & Nicolson Gohm, C. L., Oishi, S., Darlington, J., & Diener, E. (1998). Culture, parental conflict, parental marital status, and the subjective well-being o