Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5

Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project

Pages
1257–1270
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it was believed that our methodology could be implemented in all related medical fields.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: It is necessary to incorporate novel training modalities in medical education, especially in surgical fields, because ofthe limitations of cadaveric training.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The MedTRain3DModsim Project aimed toproduce 3-dimensional (3D) medical printed models, simulations, and innovative applications for every level of medical training usingnovel worldwide technologies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it was believed that our methodology could be implemented in all related medical fields.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: It is necessary to incorporate novel training modalities in medical education, especially in surgical fields, because ofthe limitations of cadaveric training. Traditional medical education has many drawbacks, such as residency working hour restrictions,patient safety conflicts with the learning needs, and the lack of hands-on workshops. The MedTRain3DModsim Project aimed toproduce 3-dimensional (3D) medical printed models, simulations, and innovative applications for every level of medical training usingnovel worldwide technologies. It was aimed herein to improve the interdisciplinary and transnational approaches, and accumulateexisting experience for medical education, postgraduate studies, and specialty training.Materials and methods: This project focused on models of solid organs and the urinary system, including the kidney, prostate, ureter,and liver. With 3D medical printing, it is possible to produce a body part from inert materials in just a few hours with the standardizationof medical 3D modeling.Results: The target groups of this project included medical students and residents, graduate students from engineering departmentswho needed medical education and surgical training, and medical researchers interested in health technology or clinical and surgicalanatomy.Conclusion: It was also intended to develop a novel imaging platform for education and training by reevaluating the existing data usingnew software and 3D modalities. Therefore, it was believed that our methodology could be implemented in all related medical fields.

🔖

Cite This Article

HURİ, E., TATAR, İ., SKOLARIKOS, A., PAOLUZZI, A., MOON, Y. L., SELÇUK, İ. (2022). Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5, 1257–1270. https://ajindex.com/articles/609885

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aggarwal S, Choudhury E, Ladha S, Kapoor PM, Kiran U. Simulation in cardiac catheterization laboratory: Need of the hour to improve the clinical skills. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia 2016
  2. 19 (3): 521-6. doi: 10.4103/0971- 9784.185548 2. Hasan T. Is dissection humane? Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 2011
  3. Hildebrandt S. Capital punishment and anatomy: history and ethics of an ongoing association. Clinical Anatomy 2008
  4. 21 (1): 5-14. 4. Rodriguez-Paz JM, Kennedy M, Salas E, Wu AW, Sexton JB et al. Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: toward a different training paradigm. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2009
  5. 18 (1): 63-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023903 5. Aydin A, Raison N, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery. Nature Reviews Urology 2016
  6. 13 (9): 503-19. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.147 6. Rodgers A, Trinchieri A, Ather MH, Buchholz N
  7. U-Merge Scientific Office. Vision for the future on urolithiasis: research, management, education and training-some personal views. Urolithiasis 2018
  8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1086-2 7. Sarmah P, Voss J, Ho A, Veneziano D, Somani B. Low vs. high fidelity: the importance of ‘realism’ in the simulation of a stone treatment procedure. Current Opinion in Urology 2017
  9. 27 (4): 316-322. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000401 8. Khan R, Aydin A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Simulationbased training for prostate surgery. British Journal of Urology International 2015
  10. 116 (4): 665-74. doi: 10.1111/bju.12721 9. Viswaroop SB, Gopalakrishnan G, Kandasami SV. Role of transurethral resection of the prostate simulators for training in transurethral surgery. Current Opinion in Urology 2015
  11. 25 (2): 153-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000141 10. Brunckhorst O, Aydin A, Abboudi H, Sahai A, Khan MS et al. Simulation-based ureteroscopy training: a systematic review. Journal of Surgical Education 2015
  12. 72 (1): 135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.07.003 11. Noureldin YA, Andonian S. Simulation for percutaneous renal access: Where are we? Journal of Endourology 2017
  13. 31 (S1): S10-S19. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0587 12. Nataraja RM, Webb N, Lopez PJ. Simulation in paediatric urology and surgery, Part 2: An overview of simulation modalities and their applications. Journal of Pediatric Urology 2018
  14. 14 (2): 125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.009 13. Youssef RF, Spradling K, Yoon R, Dolan B, Chamberlin J et al. Applications of three-dimensional printing technology in urological