Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

Obesity perception survey among youth in Turkey: instrument development and testretest reliability

Pages
1228–1235
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using a 0.5 cutoff for the ICC’s lower 95% confidence limit, followed by reevaluationof the question flow, a 19-question (36-item) survey was retained for adolescents and a 26-question (52-item) survey for young adults.Conclusion: While the survey items have moderate to excellent reliability for high school and university students, it can be administeredlongitudinally to suggest changes to policies and interventions, and after cross-cultural validation, it can be utilized to compare obesityperceptions across different populations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: We aimed to develop an instrument that can assess the perceptions and opinions of young people regarding the causesand consequences of obesity and the role of individuals, families, communities, and government in addressing obesity.Materials and methods: A 36-question (101-item) survey was developed by adopting, translating, and revising multiple-choice or Likertscale questions from existing surveys to assure construct cross-cultural validity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A two-factor mixed-effects model estimated the intraclasscorrelation coefficient (ICC) to measure the test-retest reliability of questions administered 2 weeks apart to a convenient sample ofİstanbul high school and university students, aged 15–25 years (n = 122).Results: The mean ICC for university and high school was 0.70 and 0.63, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using a 0.5 cutoff for the ICC’s lower 95% confidence limit, followed by reevaluationof the question flow, a 19-question (36-item) survey was retained for adolescents and a 26-question (52-item) survey for young adults.Conclusion: While the survey items have moderate to excellent reliability for high school and university students, it can be administeredlongitudinally to suggest changes to policies and interventions, and after cross-cultural validation, it can be utilized to compare obesityperceptions across different populations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: We aimed to develop an instrument that can assess the perceptions and opinions of young people regarding the causesand consequences of obesity and the role of individuals, families, communities, and government in addressing obesity.Materials and methods: A 36-question (101-item) survey was developed by adopting, translating, and revising multiple-choice or Likertscale questions from existing surveys to assure construct cross-cultural validity. A two-factor mixed-effects model estimated the intraclasscorrelation coefficient (ICC) to measure the test-retest reliability of questions administered 2 weeks apart to a convenient sample ofİstanbul high school and university students, aged 15–25 years (n = 122).Results: The mean ICC for university and high school was 0.70 and 0.63, respectively. University students were more consistent in relatingthe problem to society and public policy preferences. High school students were more consistent in relating the problem and solutionto themselves and their immediate environments. Using a 0.5 cutoff for the ICC’s lower 95% confidence limit, followed by reevaluationof the question flow, a 19-question (36-item) survey was retained for adolescents and a 26-question (52-item) survey for young adults.Conclusion: While the survey items have moderate to excellent reliability for high school and university students, it can be administeredlongitudinally to suggest changes to policies and interventions, and after cross-cultural validation, it can be utilized to compare obesityperceptions across different populations.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORABI, M., XUN, P., JAYAWARDENE, W., PINAR, S., ÖZER, M. (2022). Obesity perception survey among youth in Turkey: instrument development and testretest reliability. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 1228–1235. https://ajindex.com/articles/609877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 377 (1): 13- 27
  2. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK et al. National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9.1 million participants. Lancet 2011; 377 (9765): 557-567
  3. Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. International Journal of Obesity 2008; 32 (9): 1431-1437
  4. Popkin B, Monteiro C, Swinburn B. Overview: Bellagio conference on program and policy options for preventing obesity in the low- and middle-income countries. Obesity Reviews 2013; 14: 1-8
  5. Wyatt SB, Winters KP, Dubbert PM. Overweight and obesity: Prevalence, consequences, and causes of a growing public health problem. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 2006; 331 (4): 166-174
  6. Keith SW, Redden DT, Katzmarzyk PT, Boggiano MM, Hanlon EC et al. Putative contributors to the secular increase in obesity: exploring the roads less traveled. International Journal of Obesity 2006; 30 (11): 1585-1594
  7. Finkelstein EA, Ruhm CJ, Kosa KM. Economic causes and consequences of obesity. Annual Review of Public Health 2005; 26 (1): 239-257
  8. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity: Turkey. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013
  9. Erem C. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in Turkey. IJC Metabolic & Endocrine 2015; 8: 38-41
  10. Bagriacik N, Onat H, Ilhan B, Tarakci T, Oşar Z et al. Obesity profile in Turkey. International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism 2009; 17: 5-8
  11. Evans WD, Renaud JM, Finkelstein E, Kamerow DB, Brown DS. Changing perceptions of the childhood obesity epidemic. American Journal of Health Behavior 2006; 30 (2): 167-176
  12. Evans WD, Finkelstein EA, Kamerow DB, Renaud JM. Public perceptions of childhood obesity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005; 28 (1): 26-32
  13. Worsley A, Wang W, Sarmugam R, Pham Q, Februhartanty J et al. Family food providers’ perceptions of the causes of obesity and effectiveness of weight control strategies in five countries in the Asia Pacific region: a cross-sectional survey. Nutrients 2017; 9 (1): 13
  14. Rendon-Macias ME, Rosas-Vargas H, Villasis-Keever MA, Perez-Garcia C. Children’s perception on obesity and quality of life: a