Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Efficacy of the in vitro splitting of human preimplantation embryos from ART programs

Pages
68–75
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For research purposes, 1PN and 3PN embryos are the best options for splitting procedures, regardless of the poor quality of developed blastocysts.Key words: Human embryo, in vitro splitting, blastocyst

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of in vitro embryo splitting (IES) procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Good quality embryos at 6–8-cell stages were categorized according to their fertilization sources: 1) frozenwarmed donated embryos, 2) chromosomally abnormal embryos, 3) parthenogenetic embryos, and 4) embryos derived from fertilization of in vitro matured oocytes (rescue IVM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For research purposes, 1PN and 3PN embryos are the best options for splitting procedures, regardless of the poor quality of developed blastocysts.Key words: Human embryo, in vitro splitting, blastocyst
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of in vitro embryo splitting (IES) procedures. We also assessed the quality of the blastocysts developed from embryos obtained from different sources. Materials and methods: Good quality embryos at 6–8-cell stages were categorized according to their fertilization sources: 1) frozenwarmed donated embryos, 2) chromosomally abnormal embryos, 3) parthenogenetic embryos, and 4) embryos derived from fertilization of in vitro matured oocytes (rescue IVM). After IES, splitting and developmental efficiency was assessed. Furthermore, the quality of the developed blastocysts was evaluated by Hoechst and propidium iodide (PI) staining. Results: The data showed a high rate of both splitting and developmental efficiency in the frozen-warmed embryos after IES (140% and 71.7%, respectively), followed by chromosomally abnormal embryos (96.8% and 52.5%, respectively). Results of the Hoechst and PI staining showed that the mean ± SD cell numbers of the control group were higher (113.11 ± 16.01) than that of twins A (donor blastomeres embryos, 58 ± 12.2) and B (recipient blastomeres embryos, 50.4 ± 8.5), respectively. Conclusion: Chromosomally normal embryos enrolled in IES are more potent to develop into viable blastocysts. For research purposes, 1PN and 3PN embryos are the best options for splitting procedures, regardless of the poor quality of developed blastocysts.Key words: Human embryo, in vitro splitting, blastocyst

🔖

Cite This Article

OMIDI, M., KHALILI, M. A., AGHA-RAHIMI, A., NOTTOLA, S. A., ANBARI, F., FARAMARZI, A., PALMERINI, M. G. (2022). Efficacy of the in vitro splitting of human preimplantation embryos from ART programs. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 68–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/609790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Noli L, Ogilvie C, Khalaf Y, Ilic D. Potential of human twin embryos generated by embryo splitting in assisted reproduction and research. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23: 156-165
  2. Willadsen SM. A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins. Nature 1979; 277: 298-300
  3. Allen W, Pashen R. Production of monozygotic (identical) horse twins by embryo micromanipulation. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 71: 607-613
  4. Tsunoda Y, Tokunaga T, Sugie T, Katsumata M. Production of monozygotic twins following the transfer of bisected embryos in the goats. Theriogenology 1985; 24: 337-343
  5. Johnson W, Loskutoff N, Plante Y, Betteridge K. Production of four identical calves by the separation of blastomeres from an in vitro derived four-cell embryo. Vet Rec 1995; 137: 15-16
  6. Reichelt B, Niemann H. Generation of identical twin piglets following bisection of embryos at the morula and blastocyst stage. J Reprod Fert 1994; 100: 163-172
  7. Lopes R, Forell F, Oliveira A, Rodrigues J. Splitting and biopsy for bovine embryo sexing under field conditions. Theriogenology 2001; 56: 1383-1392
  8. Tarkowski AK, Wróblewska J. Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4-and 8-cell stage. Development 1967; 18: 155-180
  9. Tsunoda Y, McLaren A. Effect of various procedures on the viability of mouse embryos containing half the normal number of blastomeres. J Reprod Fertil 1983; 69: 315-322
  10. Tang HH, Tsai YC, Kuo CT. Embryo splitting can increase the quantity but not the quality of blastocysts. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 51: 236-239
  11. VandeBerg JL, Williams-Blangero S. Strategies for using nonhuman primates in genetic research on multifactorial diseases. Laboratory Animal Science 1996; 46: 146-151
  12. Schramm R, Paprocki A. Strategies for the production of genetically identical monkeys by embryo splitting. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2004; 2: 38
  13. Schramm R, Paprocki A. In vitro development and cell allocation following aggregation of split embryos with tetraploid or developmentally asynchronous blastomeres in rhesus monkeys. Cloning Stem Cells 2004; 6: 302-314
  14. Chan A, Dominko T, Luetjens C, Neuber E, Martinovich C, Hewitson L, Simerly CR, Schatten GP. Clonal propagation of primate offspring by embryo splitting. Science 2000; 287: 317- 319
  15. Mitalipov SM, Yeoman RR, Kuo HC, Wolf DP. Monozygotic twinning in rhesus monkeys by manipulation of in vitroderived embryos. Biol Reprod 2002; 66: 1449-1455
  16. Hall JL, E