Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 5

Role of frailty in prediction of hospitalized older adult patient’s outcomes: a prospective study

Pages
2324–2333
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The findings indicated that frailty worsened negative outcomes and declined QoL.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Frailty is associated with an increased risk of negative short-term and long-term hospital outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total, 304 participants (65–85 years), were enrolled through the inclusion criteria from August to December 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The findings indicated that frailty worsened negative outcomes and declined QoL.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Frailty is associated with an increased risk of negative short-term and long-term hospital outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the role of frailty in predicting readmission, length of stay, and quality of life in the hospitalized older adults. Materials and methods: This observational study was conducted at Ziaiyan Hospital, Tehran, Iran. In total, 304 participants (65–85 years), were enrolled through the inclusion criteria from August to December 2019. The frailty index (FI) was assessed by the minimum data set-home care. Readmission was obtained through telephone interviews. The length of stay was gathered by the patient’s hospital records, and the EuroQol questionnaire was used for assessing the quality of life. Data were collected by a researcher nurse at the admission time, 30, 60, and 90 days after discharge. The logistic regression model and repeated measures ANOVA were employed to analyze the association between frailty and outcomes. Results: According to FI, 102 (33.55%) participants were pre-frail, whereas 35 (11.51%) were frail. In the fully-adjusted model for readmission, the pre-frail participants had a higher risk of readmission at the hospital in comparison with the nonfrail and frail groups (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.90–3.26), and also for GP visits, frail patients showed nearly significant differences (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 0.99–6.06) but there were no differences between frail and pre-frail patients in readmissions in the emergency ward. In a fully-adjusted prolonged stay model, pre-frail patients had a higher probability to stay longer in hospital (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.24–4.18). The fullyadjusted model for QoL showed, frail patients were more prone to the declined levels of QoL in comparison with pre-frail patients (OR = 10.77, 95% CI: 3.97–29.18). Conclusions: The findings indicated that frailty worsened negative outcomes and declined QoL. Early diagnosis in hospital settings could be beneficial for designing optimal care plans for the frail and pre-frail patients.Key words: Frailty, hospitalization, quality of life

🔖

Cite This Article

CHEHREHGOSHA, M., VATAN, R. F., ALIZADEH-KHOEI, M., SHARIFI, F., AMINALROAYA, R., VAHABI, Z., ZENDEDEL, A., HEKMAT, H. (2022). Role of frailty in prediction of hospitalized older adult patient’s outcomes: a prospective study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 5, 2324–2333. https://ajindex.com/articles/609775

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kim DH. Measuring frailty in health care databases for clinical care and research. Annals Geriatric Medicine Research 2020
  2. 24 (2): 62-74. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0002 2. Hubbard RE, Peel NM, Samanta M, Gray LC, Mitnitski A et al. Frailty status at admission to hospital predicts multiple adverse outcomes. Age Ageing 2017
  3. 46 (5): 801-806. doi: 10.1093/ ageing/afx081. PMID: 28531254 3. O’Hoski S, Bean JF, Ma J, So HY, Kuspinar A et al. Physical function and frailty for predicting adverse outcomes in older primary care patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2020
  4. 101 (4): 592-598. doi: 10.1016/j. apmr.2019.11.013 4. Chong E, Ho E, Baldevarona-Llego J, Chan M, Wu L et al. Frailty in hospitalized older adults: comparing different frailty measures in predicting short- and long-term patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2018
  5. 19 (5): 450-457. e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.006 5. Chen CL, Chen CM, Wang CY, Ko PW, Chen CH et al. Frailty is associated with an increased risk of major adverse outcomes in elderly patients following surgical treatment of hip fracture. Scientific Reports 2019
  6. 9 (1): 1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019- 55459-2 6. Lachmann R, Stelmach-Mardas M, Bergmann MM, Bernigau W, Weber D et al. The accumulation of deficits approach to describe frailty. PLoS One 2019
  7. 14 (10): e0223449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223449 7. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatrics 2008
  8. 8 (1): 24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-8-24 8. Wellens NIH, Deschodt M, Flamaing J, Moons P, Boonen S et al. First-generation versus third-generation comprehensive geriatric assessment instruments in the acute hospital setting: a comparison of the minimum geriatric screening tools (MGST) and the interRAI acute care (interRAI AC). The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 2011
  9. 15 (8): 638-44. doi: 10.1007/ s12603-011-0109-2 9. Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. The Journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2007
  10. 62 (7): 738-743. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.7.738 10. Kerminen, H., Huhtala, H., Jäntti, P. Frailty index and functional level upon admission predict hospital outcomes: an interRAI-based cohort study of older patients in postacute care hospitals. BMC Geriatrics 2020
  11. 20 (160): 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01550-7 11. Cesari M, Gambassi G, Van Kan GA