Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Effects of different analgesic methods used for vaginal delivery on mothers and fetuses

Pages
930–936
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results demonstrated that regional analgesia methods were reasonably safe for both mother and fetus, and regionalanalgesia methods resulted in greater maternal satisfaction and pain control compared to meperidine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Knowledge regarding pain relief during labor remains insufficient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We collected prospective data from patientswhose labor pain management was conducted with meperidine in addition to retrospective cohort data of neuraxial methods; 138patients were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results demonstrated that regional analgesia methods were reasonably safe for both mother and fetus, and regionalanalgesia methods resulted in greater maternal satisfaction and pain control compared to meperidine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Knowledge regarding pain relief during labor remains insufficient. We aimed to determine and compare theeffectiveness and safety of epidural analgesia, combined spinal–epidural analgesia, and parenteral meperidine on both mothers andfetuses.Materials and methods: This study was designed as an observational case-control study. We collected prospective data from patientswhose labor pain management was conducted with meperidine in addition to retrospective cohort data of neuraxial methods; 138patients were enrolled. Epidural analgesia group consisted of 68 patients, whereas combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia group andmeperidine group consisted of 50 and 20 patients, respectively. We compared the delivery patterns, labor durations, pain levels, sideeffects, maternal satisfaction levels, and neonatal outcomes of the various pain management methods.Results: Patient demographics, duration of first, second, and third labor stages, and instrumental delivery rates were comparable amonggroups (P > 0.05). Cesarean section tended to be less frequent in the CSE group. In the meperidine group, visual analog scale (VAS)values and sedation were significantly higher (P < 0.001) and maternal satisfaction lower (P < 0.001). Hypotension tended to be morefrequent in the meperidine group. APGAR scores at the 1st and 5th min were similar among the groups and between meperidinesubgroups defined by three different administration times ( 0.05).Conclusion: Neuraxial methods had no effect on instrumental delivery rates. CSE represented a near significant risk reduction incesarean section. Our results demonstrated that regional analgesia methods were reasonably safe for both mother and fetus, and regionalanalgesia methods resulted in greater maternal satisfaction and pain control compared to meperidine.

🔖

Cite This Article

BABAOĞLU, G., KILIÇASLAN, B., YILBAŞ, A. A., ÇELEBİOĞLU, B. (2022). Effects of different analgesic methods used for vaginal delivery on mothers and fetuses. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 930–936. https://ajindex.com/articles/609688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Wong CA. Advances in labor analgesia. International Journal of Womens Health 2010
  2. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s4553 2. Rowlands S, Permezel M. Physiology of pain in labour. Bailliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1998
  3. 12(3): 347-362. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(98)80071-0 3. Silva M, Halpern SH. Epidural analgesia for labor: Current techniques. Local and Regional Anesthesia 2010
  4. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S10237 4. Jeschke E, Ostermann T, Dippong N, Brauer D, Pumpe J et al. Identification of maternal characteristics associated with the use of epidural analgesia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2012
  5. 32(4): 342-346. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.661491 5. Committee on Obstetric P. ACOG committee opinion #269. Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2002
  6. 99(2): 369-370. doi: 10.1016/s0029- 7844(01)01770-7 6. Cambic CR, Wong CA. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2010
  7. 105 Suppl 1: i50-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq311 7. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011(12): CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3 8. Clarke VT, Smiley RM, Finster M. Uterine hyperactivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labor: a cause of fetal bradycardia? Anesthesiology 1994
  8. 81(4): 1083. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199410000-00041 9. Agrawal D, Makhija B, Arora M, Haritwal A, Gurha P. The effect of epidural analgesia on labour, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in nullipara of India, 2011-2014. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2014
  9. 8(10): OC03-06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9974.4930 10. Segal S, Blatman R, Doble M, Datta S. The influence of the obstetrician in the relationship between epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia. Anesthesiology 1999
  10. 91(1): 90- 96. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00016 11. MacArthur C, Wilson D, Herbison P, Lancashire RJ, Hagen S et al. Faecal incontinence persisting after childbirth: a 12 year longitudinal study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2013
  11. 120(2): 169-179. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12039 12. Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor C, Thakar R et al. Women’s sexual health after childbirth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000
  12. 107(2): 186-195. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11689.x 13. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Romito P, Lelong N, Ancel PY. Women’s health after childbirth: a