Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Family-centeredness of services for young children with Down syndrome: an observational study from Turkey

Pages
246–255
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On univariate analyses, maternal education

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Physicians require information on the family centeredness of services for children with Down syndrome, one of the most frequently encountered disabilities in childhood.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In a crosssectional design, children with Down syndrome seen at Ankara University Developmental Pediatrics Division (AUDPD) between February 2020 and June 2020 were included if they had received services in the community for at least 12 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On univariate analyses, maternal education
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Physicians require information on the family centeredness of services for children with Down syndrome, one of the most frequently encountered disabilities in childhood. We aimed to determine the family-centeredness of services for young children with Down syndrome and using a bioecological theory framework we hypothesized that child, family and service-related factors would be associated with such services. Materials and methods: In a crosssectional design, children with Down syndrome seen at Ankara University Developmental Pediatrics Division (AUDPD) between February 2020 and June 2020 were included if they had received services in the community for at least 12 months. Mothers responded to the measure of process of care-20 (MPOC-20) used to measure family centeredness. Results: All 65 eligible children were included; 57% were boys and median age was 25.0 (IQR: 18.5–38.0) months. The MPOC-20 subscale scores were highest for the “respectful and supportive care (RSC)” (median 6.0; IQR: 4.8–6.8) and lowest for the “providing specific information” (median 3.0; IQR: 4.4–6.5) subscales. On univariate analyses, maternal education

🔖

Cite This Article

AKPINAR, F., PEKCİCİ, E. B. B., AKIN, E. Ö., HAYRAN, G., KELEŞ, C., YAĞBASAN, B., ERTEM, İ. Ö., KURŞUN, N. (2022). Family-centeredness of services for young children with Down syndrome: an observational study from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 246–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/609612

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Brewer EJ Jr, McPherson M, Magrab PR, Hutchins VL. Familycentered, community-based, coordinated care for children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 1989; 83 (6): 1055- 1060
  2. Bull MJ, Committee on Genetics. Health supervision for children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (2): 393- 406. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1605 3. Hostler SL. Family-centered care. Pediatric Clinics of North America 1991; 38 (6):1545-1560
  3. Kuhlthau KA, Bloom S, Van Cleave J, Knapp AA, Romm D et al. Evidence for family‐centered care for children with special health care needs: a systematic review. Academic Pediatrics 2011; 11 (2): 136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.12.014 5. Moore MH, Mah JK, Trute B. Family-centred care and healthrelated quality of life of patients in paediatric neurosciences. Child: Care, Health and Development 2009; 35 (4): 454-461. doi: 10.111/j.1365-2214.2008.00902.x 6. Cunningham BJ, Rosenbaum PL. Measure of processes of care: a review of 20 years of research. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2014; 56 (5): 445-452. doi: 10.1111/ dmcn.12347 7. Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P. Family-centered theory: origins, development, barriers, and supports to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008; 89 (8): 1618-1624. doi: 10.1016/j. apmr.2007.12.034 8. Himuro N, Kozuka N, Mori M. Measurement of family-centred care: translation, adaptation and validation of the measure of processes of care (MPOC-56 and -20) for use in Japan. Child: Care, Health and Development 2013; 39 (3): 358‐365. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01371.x 9. An M, Kim JG, Kim J. Measure of processes of care (MPOC): translation and validation for use in Korea. Child: Care, Health and Development 2018; 44 (4): 545-551. doi: 10.1111/ cch.12577 10. Wang M, Petrini MA, Guan Q. Evaluation of family-centred services from parents of Chinese children with cerebral palsy with the measure of processes of care. Child: Care, Health and Development 2015; 41 (3): 408-415. doi: 10.1111/cch.12183 11. Tang HN, Chong WH, Goh W, Chan WP, Choo S. Evaluation of family-centred practices in the early intervention programmes for infants and young children in Singapore with measure of processes of care for service providers and measure of beliefs about participation in family-centred service. Child: Care, Health and Development 2012; 38 (1): 54-60. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-2214.2011.01259.x 12. King G, Williams L, Hahn Goldberg S. Family-oriented services in pediatric r