Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 5

Differences in corpus callosum morphology between healthy adolescents and adolescents with migraine: a case control study

Pages
2346–2350
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our findings may contribute to enlighten migraine pathophysiology.Key words: Migraine, corpus callosum, corpus callosum/diagnostic imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, child, adolescent

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study objected to compare the measurements of corpus callosum substructures of adolescents with migraine and healthy adolescents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In a case-control design, adolescents aged 12–18 years with the diagnosis of migraine and healthy control group had brain magnetic resonance imaging examination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our findings may contribute to enlighten migraine pathophysiology.Key words: Migraine, corpus callosum, corpus callosum/diagnostic imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, child, adolescent
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study objected to compare the measurements of corpus callosum substructures of adolescents with migraine and healthy adolescents. Materials and methods: In a case-control design, adolescents aged 12–18 years with the diagnosis of migraine and healthy control group had brain magnetic resonance imaging examination. The CC dimensions including anteroposterior length, truncus, genu and splenium widths of the case and control groups were measured and compared. Results: The sample consisted of 188 adolescents, 109 girls (58.0%), and 79 boys (42.0%). Of these 87 (46.3%) were in the migraine group and 101 (53.7%) were in the healthy control group. The mean genu and splenium width of the migraine group were significantly lower than the control group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.01 respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study firstly demonstrated that CC splenium and genu widths were smaller in adolescents with migraine when compared to healthy adolescents. Our findings may contribute to enlighten migraine pathophysiology.Key words: Migraine, corpus callosum, corpus callosum/diagnostic imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, child, adolescent

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, M. E., KURT, A. N. Ç. (2022). Differences in corpus callosum morphology between healthy adolescents and adolescents with migraine: a case control study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 5, 2346–2350. https://ajindex.com/articles/609596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Greene K, Irwin SL, Gelfand AA. Pediatric migraine: an update. Neurologic Clinics 2019
  2. 37 (4): 815-833. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2019.07.009 2. Lakhan SE, Avramut M, Tepper SJ. Structural and functional neuroimaging in migraine: insights from 3 decades of research. Headache 2013
  3. 53 (1): 46-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1526- 4610.2012.02274.x 3. Sprenger T, Borsook D. Migraine changes the brain: neuroimaging makes its mark. Current Opinion in Neurology 2012
  4. 25 (3): 252-262. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283532ca3 4. Schwedt TJ, Dodick DW. Advanced neuroimaging of migraine. Lancet Neurology 2009
  5. 8 (6): 560-568. doi: 10.1016/S1474- 4422(09)70107-3 5. Hamedani AG, Rose KM, Peterlin BL, Mosley TH, Coker LH et al. Migraine and white matter hyperintensities: the ARIC MRIstudy. Neurology 2013
  6. 81 (15): 1308-1313. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a8235b 6. Bashir A, Lipton RB, Ashina S, Ashina M. Migraine and structural changes in the brain: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Neurology 2013
  7. 81 (14): 1260-1268. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a6cb32 7. Schmitz N, Admiraal-Behloul F, Arkink EB, Kruit MC, Schoonman GG et al. Attack frequency and disease duration as indicators for brain damage in migraine. Headache 2008
  8. 48 (7): 1044-1055. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01133.x 8. Rocca MA, Messina R, Colombo B, Falini A, Comi G et al. Structural brain MRI abnormalities in pediatric patients with migraine. Journal of Neurology 2014
  9. 261 (2): 350-357. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7201-y 9. Tehrani KHN. An investigation of the prevalence of subclinical brain lesions in MRI images of migraine patients. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 2018
  10. 6 (7): 1239- 1243. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.263 10. Candee MS, McCandless RT, Moore KR, Arrington CB, Minich LL, Bale JF Jr. White matter lesions in children and adolescents with migraine. Pediatric Neurology 2013
  11. 49 (6): 393-396. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.025 11. Eidlitz-Markus T, Zeharia A, Haimi-Cohen Y, Konen O. MRI white matter lesions in pediatric migraine. Cephalalgia 2013
  12. 33 (11): 906-913. doi: 10.1177/0333102413480955 12. Van der Knaap LJ, Van der Ham IJ. How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review. Behavioural Brain Research 2011
  13. 223 (1): 211-221. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018 13. Horton JE, Crawford HJ, Harrington G, Downs JH 3rd. Increased anterior corpus callosum size associated positively with hypnotizability and the ability to control pain. Brain 2004
  14. 127 (Pt 8): 1741-1747. doi: 10.1093