Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Projecting the course of COVID-19 in Turkey: A probabilistic modeling approach

Pages
16–27
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We hope that the discussion on these projections and the limitations of the epidemiological forecasting will be beneficial to the medical community, and policy makers.Key words: COVID-19, pandemic, epidemiology, Bayesian regression, Turkey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The COVID-19 pandemic originated in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and became one of the worst global health crises ever.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Here, we present a different approach, a Bayesian negative binomial multilevel model with mixed effects, for the projection of the COVID-19 pandemic and we apply this model to the Turkish case.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We hope that the discussion on these projections and the limitations of the epidemiological forecasting will be beneficial to the medical community, and policy makers.Key words: COVID-19, pandemic, epidemiology, Bayesian regression, Turkey
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The COVID-19 pandemic originated in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 and became one of the worst global health crises ever. While struggling with the unknown nature of this novel coronavirus, many researchers and groups attempted to project the progress of the pandemic using empirical or mechanistic models, each one having its drawbacks. The first confirmed cases were announced early in March, and since then, serious containment measures have taken place in Turkey. Materials and methods: Here, we present a different approach, a Bayesian negative binomial multilevel model with mixed effects, for the projection of the COVID-19 pandemic and we apply this model to the Turkish case. The model source code is available at https:// github.com/kansil/covid-19. We predicted the confirmed daily cases and cumulative numbers from June 6th to June 26th with 80%, 95%, and 99% prediction intervals (PI). Results: Our projections showed that if we continued to comply with the measures and no drastic changes were seen in diagnosis or management protocols, the epidemic curve would tend to decrease in this time interval. Also, the predictive validity analysis suggests that the proposed model projections should have a PI around 95% for the first 12 days of the projections. Conclusion: We expect that drastic changes in the course of COVID-19 in Turkey will cause the model to suffer in predictive validity, and this can be used to monitor the epidemic. We hope that the discussion on these projections and the limitations of the epidemiological forecasting will be beneficial to the medical community, and policy makers.Key words: COVID-19, pandemic, epidemiology, Bayesian regression, Turkey

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜLKÜ, S. N., ACAR, A. C., BURDUROĞLU, H. C., SON, Y. A., AKIN, L., ÜNAL, S., ER, A. G. (2022). Projecting the course of COVID-19 in Turkey: A probabilistic modeling approach. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 16–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/609564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bennett J, Dolin R, Blaser MJ. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier/Saunders
  2. ISBN: 9781455748013 2. Jones DS. History in a crisis - lessons for COVID-19. New England Journal of Medicine 2020
  3. 382 (18): 1681-1683. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2004361 3. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019- nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet 2020
  4. 395 (10225): 689-697. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30260-9 4. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K et al. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College London Reports 2020
  5. doi: 10.25561/77482 5. Hogan AB, Jewell B, Sherrard-Smith E. Report 19: The Potential Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on HIV, TB and Malaria in Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Imperial College London Reports 2020
  6. doi: 10.25561/78670 6. Imai N, Dorigatti I, Cori A, Donnelly C, Riley S et al. Report 2: Estimating the potential total number of novel Coronavirus cases in Wuhan City, China. Imperial College London Reports 2020
  7. doi: 10.25561/77150 7. Pristerà P, Papageorgiou V, Kaur M, Atchison C, Redd R et al. Report 14: Online community involvement in COVID-19 research & outbreak response: early insights from a UK perspective. Imperial College London Reports 2020
  8. doi: 10.25561/77842 8. Vollmer MA, Mishra S, Unwin HJT, Gandy A, Mellan TA et al. A sub-national analysis of the rate of transmission of COVID-19 in Italy. medRxiv 2020
  9. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.05.20089359 9. IHME COVID-19 health service utilization forecasting team, Murray CJ. Forecasting COVID-19 impact on hospital bed-days, ICU-days, ventilator-days and deaths by US state in the next 4 months. medRxiv 2020
  10. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.27.20043752 10. Maier BF, Brockmann D. Effective containment explains subexponential growth in confirmed cases of recent COVID-19 outbreak in Mainland China. Science 2020
  11. 368 (6492): 742- 746. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4557 11. Marchant R, Samia NI, Rosen O, Tanner MA, Cripps S. Learning as we go: An examination of the statistical accuracy of COVID19 daily death count predictions. medRxiv 2020: 1-5. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.11.20062257 12. Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD, Lee D, Goodrich B et al. Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of statisti