Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Turkish reliability and validity study of the medical outcomes study (MOS) sleep scale in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Pages
268–279
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Turkish MOS sleep scale is a measurement tool that consists of 12 items and 6 subdimensions with adequate validity and reliability indicators.Key words: Medical outcomes study-sleep scale, obstructive sleep apnea, sleep quality, reliability, validity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the Turkish reliability and validity of the medical outcomes study (MOS) sleep scale in patients who have obstructive sleep apnea.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The data of the study were collected from 120 adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea and from 90 healthy individuals between March 04 and May 31, 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Turkish MOS sleep scale is a measurement tool that consists of 12 items and 6 subdimensions with adequate validity and reliability indicators.Key words: Medical outcomes study-sleep scale, obstructive sleep apnea, sleep quality, reliability, validity
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the Turkish reliability and validity of the medical outcomes study (MOS) sleep scale in patients who have obstructive sleep apnea. Materials and methods: The data of the study were collected from 120 adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea and from 90 healthy individuals between March 04 and May 31, 2019. Results: The Cronbach’s α internal consistency reliability coefficient of the MOS sleep scale was found as 0.82. The test-retest reliability was acceptable (r = 0.76-0.94). Six factors were identified by the factor analysis. These were the same as those in the original MOS-Sleep. The correlations between the MOS-Sleep and other instruments administered in this study provided evidence for structural validity. A significant relation was determined between MOS sleep scale and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) severity and the healthy group ( P < 0.05). In addition, the Cronbach α internal consistency reliability coefficient of the healthy group in MOS sleep scale was found as 0.78. The items of the six factors that were obtained with the confirmatory factor analysis for the MOS sleep scale of the healthy group were found to be the same as in the original MOS-Sleep. Conclusion: Turkish MOS sleep scale is a measurement tool that consists of 12 items and 6 subdimensions with adequate validity and reliability indicators.Key words: Medical outcomes study-sleep scale, obstructive sleep apnea, sleep quality, reliability, validity

🔖

Cite This Article

YETKİN, S., AKÇAY, B. D., AKÇAY, D. (2022). Turkish reliability and validity study of the medical outcomes study (MOS) sleep scale in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 268–279. https://ajindex.com/articles/609552

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kryger MH. Diagnosis and management of sleep apnea syndrome. Clinical Cornerstone 2000
  2. doi: 10.1016/ S1098-3597(00)90039-5 2. Flemons WW. Obstructive sleep apnea. The New England Journal of Medicine 2002
  3. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMcp012849 3. Patil SP. What every clinician should know about polysomnography. Respiratory Care 2010
  4. Buysse DJ, Reynolds III CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research 1989
  5. 28 (2): 193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 5. Douglass AB, Bomstein R, Nino-Murcia G, Keenan S, Miles L et al. The sleep disorders questionnaire I: creation and multivariate structure of SDQ. Sleep 1994
  6. 17 (2):160-167. doi: 10.1093/sleep/17.2.160 6. Zisapel N, Nir T. Determination of the minimal clinically significant difference on a patient visual analog sleep quality scale. Journal Sleep Research 2003
  7. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1105.2003.00365.x 7. Spoormaker VI, Verbeek I, Van den Bout J, Klip EC. Initial validation of the SLEEP-50 questionnaire. Behavior Sleep Medicine 2005
  8. doi: 10.1207/s15402010bsm0304_4 8. Özdemir PG, Boysan M, Selvi Y, Yıldırım A, Yılmaz E. Psychometric Properties of The Turkish Version of The Sleep Hygiene Index in Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2015
  9. doi: 10.1016/j. comppsych.2015.02.001 9. Agargun MY. Pittsburgh uyku kalitesi indeksinin gecerligi ve guvenirligi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1996
  10. Agargun MY, Çilli AS, Kara H, Bilici M, Telcioğlu M et al. Epworth Uykululuk Ölçeği’nin geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1999
  11. Acar HV, Kaya A, Yücel F, Erdem M, Günal SE et al. Obstrüktif uyku apnesi tarama testi olarak kullanılan STOP-Bang testinin Türk popülasyonunda geçerliliğinin saptanmasi. Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation 2013
  12. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2013.46 12. Hays RD, Martin SA, Sesti AM, Spritzer KL. Psychometric properties of the medical outcomes study sleep measure. Sleep Medicine 2005
  13. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.07.006 13. Allen RP, Kosinski M, Hill-Zabala CE, Calloway MO. Psychometric evaluation and tests of validity of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Sleep Scale (MOS sleep). Sleep Medicine 2009
  14. 10 (5): 531-539. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.06.003 14. Rejas J, Ribera MV, Ruiz M, Masrramón X. Psychometric properties of the MOS (Medical Outcom