Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

The platelet to lymphocyte ratio predicts overall survival better than the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Pages
757–765
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Background/aim: The prognostic values of systemic inflammatory markers, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on overall survival (OS) of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (mRCC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) remain unclear.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The prognostic values of systemic inflammatory markers, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on overall survival (OS) of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (mRCC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) remain unclear.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: A total of 150 patients receiving TKIs were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The PLR is a readily and inexpensively obtained marker, which may predict OS in patients with mRCC treated with TKIs.Key words: NLR, PLR, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prognosis, tyrosine kinase inhibitors
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The prognostic values of systemic inflammatory markers, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on overall survival (OS) of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (mRCC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) remain unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of these markers on OS of mRCC patients. Materials and methods: A total of 150 patients receiving TKIs were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival and OS times were analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log‐rank test was used for comparison. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the impact of NLR and PLR on OS of the patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined that the optimal cut-off values of NL, and PLR in predicting OS were 2 and 204, respectively. Results: Patient with PLR > 204 had significantly lower median OS time than those with PLR ≤ 204 (14.6 months vs. 31.6 months, P < 0.001). While the univariate analyses showed that both NLR and PLR associated with OS (NLR: P = 0.002; PLR: P < 0.001), PLR, not NLR, was an independent determinant for OS in the multivariate analyses (Hazard Ratio: 2.535, 95% CI: 1.564-4.108, P < 0.001). Additionally, the presence of brain metastases and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic scoring system were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS (brain metastases: P = 0.040; IMDC: P < 0.001). Conclusion: The PLR is a readily and inexpensively obtained marker, which may predict OS in patients with mRCC treated with TKIs.Key words: NLR, PLR, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prognosis, tyrosine kinase inhibitors

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCE, D., YALÇIN, Ş., GÜNER, G., GÜVEN, D. C., https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-0701, H., ERMAN, M., ŞAHİN, T. K., ARDIÇ, F. S. (2022). The platelet to lymphocyte ratio predicts overall survival better than the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 757–765. https://ajindex.com/articles/609536

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2016
  2. 66 (1): 7-30. doi: 10.3322/ caac.21332 2. Gandaglia G, Ravi P, Abdollah F, Abd-El A-E-RM. Contemporary incidence and mortality rates of kidney cancer in the United States. Canadian Urological Association Journal 2014
  3. 8 (7-8): 247. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1760 3. Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, Swanton C, Albiges L et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2017
  4. 17009. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.9 4. Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor–targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009
  5. 27 (34): 5794-5799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4809 5. Kotecha RR, Motzer RJ, Voss MH. Towards individualized therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2019
  6. 16 (10): 621-633. doi: 10.1038/s41571- 019-0209-1 6. Webster WS, Lohse CM, Thompson RH, Dong H, Frigola X et al. Mononuclear cell infiltration in clear‐cell renal cell carcinoma independently predicts patient survival. Cancer 2006
  7. 107 (1): 46-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21951 7. Şenbabaoğlu Y, Gejman RS, Winer AG, Liu M, Van Allen EM et al. Tumor immune microenvironment characterization in clear cell renal cell carcinoma identifies prognostic and immunotherapeutically relevant messenger RNA signatures. Genome Biology 2016
  8. 17 (1): 1-25. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016- 1092-z 8. Gunduz S, Mutlu H, Tural D, Yıldız Ö, Uysal M et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a new prognostic for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 2015
  9. 11 (4): 288-292. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12358 9. Park TJ, Cho YH, Chung HS, Hwang EC, Jung S-H et al. Prognostic significance of platelet–lymphocyte ratio in patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell cancer. SpringerPlus 2016
  10. 5 (1): 1889. doi: 10.1186/ s40064-016-3592-4 10. Keizman D, Ish-Shalom M, Huang P, Eisenberger MA, Pili R et al. The association of pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with response rate, progression free survival and overall survival of patients treated with sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. European Journal of Cancer 2012
  11. 48 (2): 202- 208. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.001 11. Pichler M, Hutterer G, Stoeckigt C, Chromecki T, Stojakovic T et