Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

The relationship between amount of extra-prostatic extension and length of capsular contact: performances from MR images and radical prostatectomy specimens

Pages
1940–1952
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Consistent LCC estimates can be obtained from MR images providing a beneficial metric for detecting the existence of EPE and for discriminating the grades of EPE.Key words: Prostate cancer, extraprostatic extension, length of capsular contact, tumor grading, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Backround/aim: In prostate cancer, extraprostatic extension (EPE) is an unfavorable prognostic factor, and the grade of EPE is correlated with the prognosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: MR images and specimens of 110 tumors are analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Consistent LCC estimates can be obtained from MR images providing a beneficial metric for detecting the existence of EPE and for discriminating the grades of EPE.Key words: Prostate cancer, extraprostatic extension, length of capsular contact, tumor grading, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Backround/aim: In prostate cancer, extraprostatic extension (EPE) is an unfavorable prognostic factor, and the grade of EPE is correlated with the prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the utility of length of capsular contact (LCC ) in predicting the grade of EPE by correlating the measurements from MRI images and the measurements performed from radical prostatectomy specimens. Materials and methods: MR images and specimens of 110 tumors are analyzed retrospectively. The specimens are used as reference to validate the presence of EPE and to measure the ground truth LCC. MR images are evaluated by two radiologists to identify the presence of EPE and to predict the LCC indirectly. Reliability, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the evaluations are analyzed in comparison with the findings obtained from the specimens. Results: In detection of EPE existence, the radiologists achieve almost the same performance (all AUCs = 0.73) with optimal cut-off values lead to moderate sensitivity and specificity pairs (For cut-off = 15.8 mm; Se = 0.69, Sp = 0.68 and for cut-off of 14.5 mm: Se = 0.77, Sp = 0.62). In distinguishing high-grade EPE from low-grade EPE, the radiologists accomplish very similar performances (AUCs = 0.73 and 0.72) Optimal thresholds of 20.0 mm and 18.5 mm for the readers retrospectively reveal medium sensitivity and specificity pairs (Se = 0.64, Sp = 0.67; Se = 0.64, Sp = 0.67). Conclusion: Consistent LCC estimates can be obtained from MR images providing a beneficial metric for detecting the existence of EPE and for discriminating the grades of EPE.Key words: Prostate cancer, extraprostatic extension, length of capsular contact, tumor grading, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKIR, B., ONAY, A. (2022). The relationship between amount of extra-prostatic extension and length of capsular contact: performances from MR images and radical prostatectomy specimens. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 1940–1952. https://ajindex.com/articles/609471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. British Journal of Urology 2009
  2. 104 (11): 1610-1614. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22 2. Hubanks JM, Boorjian SA, Frank I, Gettman MT, Thompson RH et al. The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes. Urologic Oncology 2014
  3. 32 (1): 26.e1-26.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.09.002. Epub 2013 Feb 6 3. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. The Journal of Urology 1992
  4. 148 (2 Pt 1): 331-337. doi: 10.1016/ s0022-5347(17)36587-4 4. Sung MT, Lin H, Koch MO, Davidson DD, Cheng L. Radial distance of extraprostatic extension measured by ocular micrometer is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence: a new proposal for the sub staging of pT3a prostate cancer. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2007
  5. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213359.26003.37 5. Epstein JI, Carmichael MJ, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term follow-up. Journal of Urology 1993
  6. doi: 10.1016/s0022- 5347(17)35415-0 6. Wheeler TM, Dillioglugil O, Kattan MW, Arakawa A, Soh S et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1–2 prostate cancer. Human Pathology 1998
  7. doi: 10.1016/s0046- 8177(98)90457-9 7. Davis BJ, Pisansky TM, Wilson TM, Rothenberg HJ, Pacelli A et al. The radial distance of extraprostatic extension of prostate carcinoma: implications for prostate brachytherapy. Cancer. 1999
  8. 85 (12): 2630-2637. 8. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Pritz AG, Greene FL et al. AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edition. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2010 9. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. European Radiology 2012
  9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y 10. Eberhardt SC, Carter S, Casalino DD, Merrick G, Frank SJ et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria prostate cancer— pretreatment detection, staging, and surveillance. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2013
  10. doi: 10.1016/j.j