Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

Emergency department extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also include noncardiac arrest patients

Pages
555–561
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall survival-to-discharge rate was 25%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The primary purpose of this study is to report the experience on the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) process for patients in the critical care unit (CCU) of an emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Turkey, from cannulation to decannulation, including follow-up procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: This retrospective and observational study included eight patients who received ECMO from January 2018 to January 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall survival-to-discharge rate was 25%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The primary purpose of this study is to report the experience on the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) process for patients in the critical care unit (CCU) of an emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Turkey, from cannulation to decannulation, including follow-up procedures. Materials and methods: This retrospective and observational study included eight patients who received ECMO from January 2018 to January 2020. We evaluated the demographics, indications for ECMO, laboratory values, Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction, Survival After Veno-Arterial ECMO and ECMO net scores, the management process, and patient outcomes. Blood gas analyses done after the first hour of ECMO initiation and the reevaluation of the patients’ Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in the 24th hour of ECMO were recorded. Results: The mean age was 52.7 ± 14.2 years. The median duration of the ECMO run was 81 (min–max: 4–267) h, and the mean length of CCU stay was 10.2 ± 6.7 days. Of the 8 patients studied, 5 (62.5%) had veno-arterial and 3 (37.5%) had veno-venous ECMO. Three patients were successfully weaned (37.5%). The overall survival-to-discharge rate was 25%. Carbon dioxide levels were significantly decreased 1 h after ECMO initiation (P = 0.038) as well as the need for vasopressors. Lactate levels were lower in decannulated patients. Changes in the APACHE II score were more consistent with the clinical deterioration in patients than SOFA score changes were. Conclusions: In the early phase of ECMO, vital signs improve, and the need for vasopressors and carbon dioxide levels decrease. Thus, CCUs in Emergency Departments with ECMO capabilities could potentially be designed, and emergency department ECMO algorithms could be tailored for critically ill patients in addition to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.Key words: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, emergency department, cardiac arrest, resuscitation, critical care

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCİL, M., EGE, D., ÖZLÜER, Y. E., YAŞAR, K. Ş. (2022). Emergency department extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also include noncardiac arrest patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 555–561. https://ajindex.com/articles/609422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Napp LC, Kühn C, Bauersachs J. ECMO in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. Herz 2017
  2. doi: 10.1007/s00059- 016-4523-4 2. Bartlett RH. Esperanza: presidential address. Transactions of American Society for Artificial Internal Organs 1985
  3. Sun T, Guy A, Sidhu A, Finlayson G, Grunau B et al. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for emergency cardiac support. Journal of Critical Care 2018
  4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.011 4. Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators, Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, Beca J, Bellomo R, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association 2009
  5. doi: 10.1001/ jama.2009.1535 5. American Heart Association. American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015
  6. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000262 6. Shinar Z, Plantmason L, Reynolds J, Dembitsky W, Bellezzo J et al. Emergency physician-initiated resuscitative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2019
  7. 56(6): 666-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.02.004 7. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Extracorporeal Support. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: ELSO
  8. Weiner L, Mazzeffi MA, Hines EQ, Gordon D, Herr DL et al. Clinical utility of venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with drug-induced cardiogenic shock: a retrospective study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organizations’ ECMO case registry. Clinical Toxicology 2019
  9. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1676896 9. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Lactic acidosis. New England Journal of Medicine 2014
  10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1309483 10. Huang L, Li T, Xu L, Hu XM, Duan SW et al. Performance of multiple risk assessment tools to predict mortality for adult respiratory distress syndrome with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: An external validation study based on Chinese single-center data. Chinese Medical Journal 2016
  11. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.185871 11. Naqvi IH, Mahmood K, Ziaullaha S, Kashif SM, Sharif A. Better prognostic marker in ICU - APACHE II, SOFA or SAP II!. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 2016
  12. doi: 10.12669/pjms.325.10080 12. Kim SJ, Kim HJ, Lee HY, Ahn HS, Lee SW. Comparin