Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4

Measurement of interscalene space volume in diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome: a cadaver study

Pages
1849–1856
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, volumetric measurements from CT sections could be used in diagnosis and treatment selection in TOS patients.Key words: Thoracic outlet syndrome, surgery, diagnosis, anatomy, cadaver

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to measure the volume of interscalene space in thoracic outlet region on cadavers and radiological images and to analyze the potential value of these measurements in diagnosis and treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The dimensions of the anterior interscalene space in 8 formalin-fixed human cadavers were studied by direct measurement and additionally evaluation of the volume of this space were done by using mold and volume calculation formula of square pyramid, due to resembling a pyramid.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, volumetric measurements from CT sections could be used in diagnosis and treatment selection in TOS patients.Key words: Thoracic outlet syndrome, surgery, diagnosis, anatomy, cadaver
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to measure the volume of interscalene space in thoracic outlet region on cadavers and radiological images and to analyze the potential value of these measurements in diagnosis and treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Materials and methods: The dimensions of the anterior interscalene space in 8 formalin-fixed human cadavers were studied by direct measurement and additionally evaluation of the volume of this space were done by using mold and volume calculation formula of square pyramid, due to resembling a pyramid. In the second phase of this study, interscalene space volume was calculated by formula and compared to calculations from computed tomography (CT) sections in 18 TOS and 16 control patients. Results: There was a strong correlation between the volume calculated by formula (4.79 ± 2.18 cm3 ) and by mold (4.84 ± 1.58 cm3 ), (R = 0.934, p = 0.001) in cadavers. The average volume measured in TOS patients (2.05 ± 0.32 cm3 ) was significantly smaller than control patients (4.30 ± 1.85 cm3 , p < 0.0001). There were excellent or good results in 14 patients whereas in 4 patients who had neurogenic TOS achieved fair results after surgery. In these 4 patients the average volumes of abnormal sides were close to the healthy sides. Conclusion: In our study, volume of interscalene space in TOS patients was statistically smaller than control group. Also, the volume was even smaller in patients with excellent or good results after surgery. In this respect, volumetric measurements from CT sections could be used in diagnosis and treatment selection in TOS patients.Key words: Thoracic outlet syndrome, surgery, diagnosis, anatomy, cadaver

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKDEMIR, İ., GÜNER, M. A., CÖMERT, A., ATAÇ, G. K., KAPLAN, T., AÇAR, H. İ., HAN, S. (2022). Measurement of interscalene space volume in diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome: a cadaver study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 4, 1849–1856. https://ajindex.com/articles/609403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Atasoy E. Thoracic outlet compression syndrome. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 1996
  2. 27 (2): 265-303. doi:10.1016/ S0030-5898(20)32074-5 2. Hooper TL, Denton J, McGalliard MK, Brismee JM, Sizer PS. Thoracic outlet syndrome: a controversial clinical condition. Part I: anatomy and clinical examination/diagnosis. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 2010
  3. 18 (2): 74-83. doi: 10. 1179/106698110X12640740712734 3. Wilbourn AJ. Thoracic outlet syndromes. Neurologic Clinics 1999
  4. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70149-3 4. Jamieson WG, Chinnick B. Thoracic outlet syndrome: fact or fancy? A review of 409 consecutive patients who underwent operation. Canadian Journal of Surgery 1996
  5. 39 (4): 321-326. PMID: 8697324 5. Axelrod DA, Proctor MC, Geisser ME, Roth RS, Greenfield LJ. Outcomes after surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001
  6. doi: 10.1067/ mva.2001.113484 6. Polyzois GL, Andreopoulos AG. Stability of some soluble alginate solutions. Biomaterials 1985
  7. 6 (1): 68-69. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(85)90042-0 7. Mackinnon SE, Novak CB. Thoracic outlet syndrome. Current Problems in Surgery 2002
  8. 39 (11): 1070-1145. doi: 10.1067/ msg.2002.127926 8. Landry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM Jr, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Long-term functional outcome of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in surgically and conservatively treated patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001
  9. doi: 10.1067/ mva.2001.112950 9. Barkhordarian S. First rib resection in thoracic outlet syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (Am). 2007
  10. 32 (4): 565- 570. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.01.018 10. Han S, Yildirim E, Dural K, Ozisik K, Yazkan R et al. Transaxillary approach in thoracic outlet syndrome: the importance of resection of the first rib. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2003
  11. 24 (3): 428-433. doi: 10.1016/ s1010-7940(03)00333-6 11. Huang JH, Zager EL. Thoracic outlet syndrome. Neurosurgery 2004
  12. 55 (4): 897-902. doi: 10.1227/01. neu.0000137333.04342.4d 12. Harry WG, Bennet JDC, Guha S. Scalene muscles and brachial plexus: anatomical variations and their clinical significance. Clinical Anatomy 1997
  13. 10 (4): 250-252. doi: 10.1002/ (SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:4 3.0.CO
  14. W 13. Rusnak-Smith S, Moffat M, Rosen E. Anatomical variations of the scalene triangle: dissection of 10 cadavers. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2001
  15. 31 (2): 70-80. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.2.70 14. Savgaonkar MG, Chimmalgi M, Kulkarni UK. Anatomy of