Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1

Clinical and oncological outcomes of the low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with robotic surgery in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Pages
111–123
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: There was no statistical difference between the high ligation group and low ligation group in univariate analysis for 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (OR = 1.146; 95% CI = 0.274 to 4.797; P = 0.950, and OR = 1.141; 95% CI = 0.564 to 2.308; P = 0.713, respectively).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of this study is to compare clinical and oncologic outcomes of the high and low ligation techniques of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in rectal cancer patients treated with robotic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 77 patients with T3/T4-node negative rectal cancer with tumor penetration through the muscle wall (Stage 2) or node positive disease without distant metastases (Stage 3) who were treated electively with robotic surgical resection following nCRT at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2018 were analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: There was no statistical difference between the high ligation group and low ligation group in univariate analysis for 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (OR = 1.146; 95% CI = 0.274 to 4.797; P = 0.950, and OR = 1.141; 95% CI = 0.564 to 2.308; P = 0.713, respectively).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to compare clinical and oncologic outcomes of the high and low ligation techniques of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in rectal cancer patients treated with robotic surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 77 patients with T3/T4-node negative rectal cancer with tumor penetration through the muscle wall (Stage 2) or node positive disease without distant metastases (Stage 3) who were treated electively with robotic surgical resection following nCRT at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2018 were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups (38 patients were included in the low ligation group and 39 patients in the high ligation group). Results: There was no statistical difference between the high ligation group and low ligation group in univariate analysis for 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (OR = 1.146; 95% CI = 0.274 to 4.797; P = 0.950, and OR = 1.141; 95% CI = 0.564 to 2.308; P = 0.713, respectively). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the mean number of harvested lymph nodes and mean number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.980 and P = 0.124, respectively). Anastomosis stricture was observed significantly less frequently in the low ligation group versus the high ligation group (2.6% and 28.2%, respectively) (P = 0.002). Also, the difference for the median length of hospital stay for the high and low ligation groups was statistically significant in favor of the low ligation group (P= 0.011). Conclusion: In robotic rectal surgery, the low ligation technique of the IMA can reduce the rate of anastomosis stricture and provide similar oncological results as the high ligation technique.Key words: Rectal cancer, anastomosis stricture, inferior mesenteric artery, low ligation, robotic surgery, lymphadenectomy

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, O., GÖMCELİ, İ. (2022). Clinical and oncological outcomes of the low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with robotic surgery in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 1, 111–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/609356

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2017
  2. doi: 10.3322/ caac.21395 2. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993
  3. doi: 10.1016/0140- 6736(93)90207-w 3. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? British Journal of Surgery 1982
  4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800691019 4. Vogel JD, Eskicioglu C, Weiser MR, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of colon cancer. Diseases of the Colon andRectum 2017
  5. doi: 10.1097/ DCR.0000000000000926 5. Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S. Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 1982
  6. doi: 10.1007/bf02564164 6. Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Digestive Surgery 2008
  7. doi: 10.1159/000128172 7. Singh D, Luo J, Liu X, Ma Z, Cheng H et al. The long-term survival benefts of high and low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: a review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017
  8. 96 (47): e8520. doi: 10.1097/ MD.0000000000008520 8. Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Hotta T, Takifuji K, Watanabe T et al. Oncological outcomes following rectal cancer surgery with high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Gastrointestinal Tumors 2017
  9. doi: 10.1159/000477805 9. Hinoi T, Okajima M, Shimomura M, Egi H, Ohdan H et al. Effect of left colonic artery preservation on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer. World Journal of Surgery 2013
  10. 37 (12): 2935-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2194-3 10. Komen N, Slieker J, De Kort P, De Wilt JH, Van der Harst E et al. High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2011
  11. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1188-6 11. Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2018
  12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2247 12. Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne GH. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for ben