Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3

Turkish validity and reliability study of type 2 diabetes stigma assessment scale

Pages
1302–1309
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It was concluded that the stigma assessment scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Stigma has a high incidence and adversely affects people with diabetes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the stigma assessment scale in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It was concluded that the stigma assessment scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Stigma has a high incidence and adversely affects people with diabetes. In this context, patients face difficulties such as fear of losing their jobs, travel restrictions, isolation from social life, problems related to mental health, and feeling of wellness. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the stigma assessment scale in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods: The study sample consisted of 153 diabetic individuals. The validity of language, content, and construct were examined to evaluate the validity of the type 2 diabetes stigma assessment scale. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Results: The content validity index of 19 items which were detected as significant was found to be 0.86. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.92. The results of the item analysis show that all factor loads are significant (t-value > ±1.96). The coefficient of correlation between type 2 diabetes stigma assessment scale and test–retest technique was 0.82. Conclusion: It was concluded that the stigma assessment scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nurses may use this tool to better understand and help relieve the prevalence and severity stigma of individuals with type 2 diabetes in Turkey.Key words: Type 2 diabetes, nursing, stigma, validity

🔖

Cite This Article

İNKAYA, B., KARADAĞ, E. (2022). Turkish validity and reliability study of type 2 diabetes stigma assessment scale. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3, 1302–1309. https://ajindex.com/articles/609355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. International Diabetes Federation. The Diabetes Atlas. 9th ed. 2019
  2. Satman İ, Ömer B, Tütüncü Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S et al. Twelveyear trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eureopean Journal of Epidemiology 2013; 28: 169-180. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013- 9771-5 3. Arslan H, Konuk DS. Stigma, Spirituality and comfort concepts in Meleis’s concept development process. Maltepe University Journal of Nursing Science and Art 2009; 2 (1): 51-58
  3. Oran Tuna N, Senuzun F. A chain that needs to be broken in society: HIV / AIDS stigma and coping strategies. Journal of International Humanities 2008; 5 (1): 1-16
  4. Alonson J, Buron A, Bruffaerts R, He Y, Posada-Villa J et al. Association of perceived stigma and mood and anxiety disorders: results from the World Mental Health Surveys. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2008; 118: 305-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01241.x 6. Burn JY, Solomon SE, Miller C, Forehand R. Measurement of stigma in people with HIV/AIDS: a reexamination of the HIV Stigma Scale. AIDS Education and Prevention 2007; 19 (3): 198-208. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.3.198 7. Macq J, Solis A, Martinez G, Martiny P. Tackling tuberculosis patients’ internalized social stigma through patient centred care: an intervention study in rural Nicaragua. BMC Public Health 2008; 8 (8): 1-10 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-154 8. Cam O, Bilge A. mental illness in turkey / patient beliefs, attitudes and stamping process: a systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing 2013; 4 (2): 91-101. doi: 10.5505/ PHD.2013.92300 9. Carr D, Jaffe KJ, Friedman MA. Perceived interpersonal mistreatment among obese Americans: do race, class, and gender matter? Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16 (2): 60-68. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.453 10. Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Confronting and cog with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14 (10): 1802-1815. doi: 10.1038/ oby.2006.208 11. Kato A, Fujimaki Y, Fujimori S, Isogawa A. Onisshi Y et al. Psychological and behavioural patterns of stigma among patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2017 (7): 1-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013425 12. Kato A, Fujimaki Y, Fujimori S, Izumida Y. Suziki R et al. A qualitative study on the impact of internalized stigma on type 2 diabetes self-management Patient Education and Counseling, 2016 (99): 1233-1239, doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.002 13. Liu NF, Brown AS, Folias Younge MF, Guzman SJ e