Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of engagement in healthy ageing

Pages
596–604
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As a result of the research, it was determined that the Engagement in Healthy Aging Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in Turkish culture (Appendix).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: A long life to be spent in a healthy, independent and vigorous way is one of humanity’s biggest dreams.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out to conduct the Turkish validity and reliability study of the “Engagement in Healthy Ageing Scale” developed by Menichetti, Bonanomi, and Graffigna [3] to determine the engagement of individuals in healthy ageing and their experiences with healthy ageing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As a result of the research, it was determined that the Engagement in Healthy Aging Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in Turkish culture (Appendix).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: A long life to be spent in a healthy, independent and vigorous way is one of humanity’s biggest dreams. This is the engagement of individuals in healthy ageing processes. This study was carried out to conduct the Turkish validity and reliability study of the “Engagement in Healthy Ageing Scale” developed by Menichetti, Bonanomi, and Graffigna [3] to determine the engagement of individuals in healthy ageing and their experiences with healthy ageing. Materials and methods: The quantitative research design was used in the study and descriptive findings were presented. Personal information form and the “Engagement in Healthy Ageing Scale” were used in the study’s data collection. In addition, the “Health Seeking Behaviour Scale”, and the “Self-Efficacy Scale” were used to conduct context validity. The data of the study were analysed with the help of SPSS and the LISREL package program. Results: It was determined that the goodness of fit index values of the Engagement in Healthy Ageing Scale, which was adapted into Turkish, showed good fit and acceptable fit. To test the context validity, the correlational relationship of the Engagement in Healthy Ageing Promotion Scale with the Health Seeking Behaviour and Self-Efficacy scales were examined. As a result of the correlation analysis, it was determined that there is a positive relationship between engagement in healthy ageing and health-seeking behaviour and self-efficacy. Conclusion: As a result of the research, it was determined that the Engagement in Healthy Aging Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool in Turkish culture (Appendix).

🔖

Cite This Article

ERİŞEN, M. A., UYAR, S., KIRAÇ, R., KESEN, N. F. (2022). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of engagement in healthy ageing. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 596–604. https://ajindex.com/articles/609304

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Cankurtaran M. Aging, aging mechanisms, antiaging and lifestyle changes. In 7th National Internal Medicine Congress. Antalya, 2005
  2. Özdemirkan T, Şenlik ZB, Şimşek AÇ. Healthy active successful ageing. Turkey Health Literacy Journal 2005; 1(1): 61-67 “(in Turkish)”.doi: 10.54247/SOYD.2020.6 3. Menichetti J, Bonanomi A, Graffigna G. Engagement in Healthy Ageing Promotion Scale: development and validation. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2018; 66(1): 7-14 4. Kuh D, Karunananthan S, Bergman H, Cooper R. A lifecourse approach to healthy ageing: maintaining physical capability. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2014; 73(2): 237-248. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113003923 5. Beard JR, Officer A, De Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM et al. The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016; 387(10033): 2145-2154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 6. Owusu-Addo E, Ofori-Asenso R, Batchelor F, Mahtani K, Brijnath B. Effective implementation approaches for healthy ageing ınterventions for older people: A Rapid Review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2021; 92: 1-9.
  3. Hamer M, Lavoie KL, Bacon SL. Taking up physical activity in later life and healthy ageing: The english longitudinal study of ageing. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2014; 48(3): 239- 243.
  4. Tyas SL, Snowdon DA, Desrosiers MF, Riley KP, Markesbery WR. Healthy ageing in the nun study: Definition and neuropathologic correlates. Age and Ageing 2007; 36(6): 650- 655.
  5. Wong RY. A New strategic approach to successful aging and healthy aging. Geriatrics 2018; 3(86): 1-3. https://doi. org/10.3390/geriatrics3040086 10. Cosco TD, Prina AM, Perales J, Stephan BC, Brayne C. Operational definitions of successful aging: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics 2014; 26(3): 373.
  6. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging. Gerontologist 1997; 37: 433–440.
  7. Swedish National Institute of Public Health (SNIPH). (2007), Healthy Ageing: a Challenge for Europe, Swedish National Institute of Public Health Distribution: Stockholm
  8. Oxley H. Policies for Healthy Ageing: an Overview. OECD Health Working Papers No.42. Head of Publications Service OECD: France, 2009
  9. Sowa A, Tobiasz-Adamczyk B, Topór-Mądry R, Poscia A, La Milia DI. Predictors of heal