Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

A high-fat and high-fructose diet lowers the cecal digesta’s weight and short-chain fatty acid level of a Sprague–Dawley rat model

Pages
268–275
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results showed an 11.94% increase in body weights of rats with HFFD.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aimed to analyze the effect of a high-fat and high-fructose diet (HFFD) on the digesta weight and shortchain fatty acid (SCFA) levels of cecal digesta in rats.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 36 rats were divided into two groups with normal diet (N) and modified HFFD.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results showed an 11.94% increase in body weights of rats with HFFD.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to analyze the effect of a high-fat and high-fructose diet (HFFD) on the digesta weight and shortchain fatty acid (SCFA) levels of cecal digesta in rats. Materials and methods: This study was an experimental study with a posttest-only control group design with male Sprague–Dawley strain rats as the samples. A total of 36 rats were divided into two groups with normal diet (N) and modified HFFD. The data of energy intake, nutrients and fiber, body weight, Lee index, abdominal circumference, digesta weight, and SCFA levels of cecal digesta were collected. Results: The results showed an 11.94% increase in body weights of rats with HFFD. The total energy intake of the HFFD group was significantly higher than that of N (p = 0.000). The fiber intake and cecal digesta weight in group N were higher than that in the HFFD group (p = 0.00 and p = 0.02, respectively). The concentrations of acetate, butyrate, propionate, and total SCFA in the N group were significantly higher than in the HFFD (p = 0.041,,p = 0.004, p = 0.040, p = 0.013, respectively). A significant negative relationship was observed between the abdominal circumference and cecal digesta concentration (p = 0.029; r = −0.529) and between the Lee index and the SCFA concentration of cecal digesta (p = 0.036, r = −0.206). Conclusion: The research results showed that HFFD can reduce the weight and SCFA concentration of the cecal digesta. The negative relationship between abdominal circumference, the Lee index, and the SCFA concentration indicates the potential role in obesity incidence and metabolic diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOEHARTO, S., SULISTYOWATI, E., HANDAYANI, D., RUDIJANTO, A. (2022). A high-fat and high-fructose diet lowers the cecal digesta’s weight and short-chain fatty acid level of a Sprague–Dawley rat model. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 268–275. https://ajindex.com/articles/609299

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Greenwood HC, Bloom SR, Murphy KG. Peptides and their potential role in the treatment of diabetes and obesity. The Review of Diabetic Studies: RDS 2011; 8 (3): 355-368. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2011.8.355
  2. Shrimpton R, Rokx C. The DOUBLE BURDEN OF MALNUTRITION: A REVIEW OF GLOBAL EVIDENCE. Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Group; 2012
  3. Forse RA, Krishnamurty DM. Epidemiology and discrimination in obesity. In: Nguyen NT, Blackstone RP, Morton JM, Ponce J, Rosenthal RJ (editors). The ASMBS Textbook of Bariatric Surgery. Vol
  4. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2015
  5. Ye J. Mechanisms of insulin resistance in obesity. Frontiers of Medicine 2013; 7 (1): 14-24. doi: 10.1007/s11684-013-0262-6 5. Lavie CJ, De Schutter A, Patel DA, Romero-Corral A, Artham SM et al. Body composition and survival in stable coronary heart disease: impact of lean mass index and body fat in the “obesity paradox”. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012; 60 (15): 1374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.037
  6. Malik VS, Hu FB. Sweeteners and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: the role of sugar-sweetened beverages. Current Diabetes Reports 2012; 12: 195-203. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0259-6 7. Landsberg L, Aronne LJ, Beilin LJ, Burke V, Igel LI et al. Obesity-related hypertension: pathogenesis, cardiovascular risk, and treatment: a position paper of The Obesity Society and the American Society of Hypertension. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich.) 2013; 15 (1): 14-33. doi: 10.1111/ jch.12049
  7. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Hasil Utama RISKESDAS 2018. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan; 2018 (in Indonesian)
  8. Lozano I, Van der Werf R, Bietiger W, Seyfritz E, Peronet C et al. High-fructose and high-fat diet-induced disorders in rats: impact on diabetes risk, hepatic and vascular complications. Nutrition & Metabolism 2016; 13 (15): 1-13. doi: 10.1186/ s12986-016-0074-1
  9. Mamikutty N, Thent ZC, Sapri SR, Sahruddin NN, Yusof MRMY et al. The establishment of metabolic syndrome model by induction of fructose drinking water in male Wistar rats. BioMed Research International 2014; 2014 (263897): 1-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/263897 11. Flint HJ, Bayer EA, Rincon MT, Lamed R, White BA. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: Potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2008; 6: 121-131. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1817 12. Gao Z, Yin J, Zhang J, Ward RE, Martin RJ et