Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

Predictive values of carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for large embolus shedding in carotid artery stenting

Pages
286–293
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Carotid HR-MRI can predict the incidence of large embolus shedding in CAS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Embolus shedding is one of the important complications in carotid artery stenting (CAS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In total, 195 patients with carotid stenosis were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Carotid HR-MRI can predict the incidence of large embolus shedding in CAS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Embolus shedding is one of the important complications in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) is often used to directly reflect important biological characteristics, such as plaque size and composition, as well as the structure of the carotid artery wall. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive values of carotid HR-MRI for large embolus shedding in CAS. Materials and methods: In total, 195 patients with carotid stenosis were enrolled. Preoperative carotid HR-MRI was performed to define the nature of the carotid plaques. CAS was performed in all patients, and intraoperative embolic protection devices were used to collect the shed emboli. According to the diameter and number of shed emboli, the patients were divided into the small-embolus group (group X) and largeembolus group (group Y). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of large embolus shedding. Results: Group Y included 58 patients, and group X included 137 patients. Age, stenosis length, smoking, and ≥3 transient cerebral ischemic attacks were risk factors for large embolusshedding. Two cases of shed large emboli developed from stable plaques, and 56 cases of large emboli developed from vulnerable plaques. When vulnerable plaques were associated with more risk factors, the incidences of large embolus shedding in cases with vulnerable plaques combined with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 risk factors were 44 % (4/9), 68.1% (15/22), 72.2% (13/18), 76.5% (13/17), and 84.6% (11/13), respectively. Conclusion: Carotid HR-MRI can predict the incidence of large embolus shedding in CAS.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAN, P., ZHENG, X., WANG, E., GUO, X., GU, C., YAN, Z., LI, S., QU, C., RUAN, X., LI, J. (2022). Predictive values of carotid high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging for large embolus shedding in carotid artery stenting. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 286–293. https://ajindex.com/articles/609284

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Kazmierski MK. Stenosis of carotid arteries. Wiadomości Lekarskie 2003; 56 (5-6): 260-265
  2. Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T, Beebe HG, Bell PR et al. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2001; 33 (2 Suppl): S111-S116. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111665 3. Lian X, Liu W, Li M, Lin M, Zhu S et al. Risk factors and complications associated with difficult retrieval of embolic protection devices in carotid artery stenting. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2012; 35 (1): 43-48. doi: 10.1007/s00270- 011-0117-y 4. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. The New England Journal of Medicine 2010; 363 (5): 11- 23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 5. Chung J, Shin YS, Lim YC, Park SK. The clinical outcomes of 75 consecutive patients with cervical carotid artery stenosis treated by carotid artery stenting. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2009; 45 (6): 350-354. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.45.6.350 6. Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Manetti R, Liso A, Oshola K et al. Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting. Journal of Endovascular Therapy 2002; 9: 786-792. doi: 10.1177/152660280200900611 7. Hsu N, Wang T, Friedman O, Barjaktarevic I. Medical Management of Pulmonary Embolism: Beyond Anticoagulation. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology 2017; 20 (3): 152-161. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2017.07.004 8. Reimers B, Corvaja N, Moshiri S, Saccà S, Albiero R et al. Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation 2001; 104 (1): 12-15. doi: 10.1161/hc2601.092495 9. Wu YM, Wong HF, Chen YL, Wong MC, Toh CH. Carotid stenting of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenoses with and without the use of a distal embolic protection device. Acta Cardiologica 2011; 66 (4): 453-458.doi: 10.1080/ac.66.4.2126593 10. Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, Brehm BR, Dichgans J et al. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2003; 34 (3): 813-819. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000058160.53040.5F 11. Degnan AJ, Young VE, Gillard JH. Advances in noninvasive imaging for evaluating clinical risk and guiding therapy in carotid atherosclerosis. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 2012; 10 (1): 37-53. doi: 10.1586/erc.11.168 12. North American Sympto