Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15)

Pages
427–435
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The psychometric characteristics used to assess postoperative quality of recovery were similar to those in the English version.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a patient reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The QoR-15 has been validated in many languages; Turkish version of the QoR-15 has not yet been established.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The psychometric characteristics used to assess postoperative quality of recovery were similar to those in the English version.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a patient reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery after surgery and anesthesia. The QoR-15 has been validated in many languages; Turkish version of the QoR-15 has not yet been established. The aims of this study were to translate the QoR-15 questionnaire into Turkish and to perform a full psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version. Materials and methods: After translating the original English version of the QoR-15 scale into Turkish, the QoR-15T scale was psychometrically validated. This process included validity, reliability, responsiveness, feasibility. The QoR-15T was evaluated before the surgery and 24 h after surgery. Results: A total of 210 patients completed the pre- and postoperative questionnaires, providing a completion rate of 93.75%. The correlation coefficient between QoR-15T score and VAS score was 0.644 on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001). Inter item Cronbach’s alpha was 0.863. Global test-retest concordance coefficient was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94–1.00). Conclusion: The QoR-15T scale is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating postoperative quality of recovery in Turkish speaking patients. The psychometric characteristics used to assess postoperative quality of recovery were similar to those in the English version.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKSERT, S., EŞKİN, M. B., ŞENKAL, S., KARA, U., ŞİMŞEK, F., ÖZHAN, M. Ö., İNCE, M. E., ÖZKAN, G., ALAKUŞ, Ü., KAMBUROĞLU, H. (2022). Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15). Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 427–435. https://ajindex.com/articles/609274

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000
  2. 84 (1): 6-10. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals. bja.a013383 2. Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia Analgesia 2007
  3. 105 (1): 63– 69. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000265534.73169.95 3. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T et al. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesthesia Analgesia 1999
  4. 88 (1): 83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539- 199901000-00016 4. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000
  5. 84 (1): 11-15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366 5. Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, Karaman T, Tapar H et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2014
  6. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-8 6. Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology 2013
  7. 118 (6): 1332-1340. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b 7. Nakatani S, Ida M, Tanaka Y, Okamoto N, Wang X et al. Translation and validation of the Japanese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire. Journal of Anesthesia 2021
  8. 35 (3): 426-433. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02921-z 8. Picconi E, Iacobucci T, Adducci E, Gualtieri E, Beccia G et al. Translation and validation of the Italian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15. Minerva Anestesiologica 2020
  9. 86 (7): 787-789. doi: 10.23736/S0375- 9393.20.14472-9 9. Demumieux F, Ludes PO, Diemunsch P, Bennett-Guerrero E, Lujic M et al. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2020
  10. 124 (6): 761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011 10. Kim D, Kim JK, Yeo J. Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15. BioMed Research International 2020
  11. 3456234. doi: 10.1155/2020/3456234 11. Bu XS, Zhang J, Zuo YX. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale. The Patient 201