Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Predictors of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study

Pages
105–112
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further research is needed to determine whether measures aimed at the identified risk factors will reduce the incidence of post-ERCP.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Post-ERCP cholangitis (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and associated sepsis can be lifethreatening.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to investigate the rates, predictors, and outcomes of post-ERCP cholangitis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further research is needed to determine whether measures aimed at the identified risk factors will reduce the incidence of post-ERCP.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Post-ERCP cholangitis (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and associated sepsis can be lifethreatening. Despite the wealth of studies on post-ERCP pancreatitis risk factors, there is limited data on post-ERCP cholangitis. This study aimed to investigate the rates, predictors, and outcomes of post-ERCP cholangitis. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 452 ERCP cases performed by a single endoscopist at a tertiary center between March 2019 and February 2021 was performed. Patient-related, organizational and periprocedural factors that could affect post-ERCP cholangitis were evaluated. Predictors of post-ERCP cholangitis were determined by multivariable analysis. Results: The post-ERCP cholangitis rate was 19.5%. Cholangiocarcinoma (OR 15.72, CI 2.43–101.55, p = 0.004), the American Society of Anesthesiologist Score (ASA) (OR 2.87, CI 1.14–7.21, p = 0.024), an increase in bilirubin after ERCP (OR 1.81 CI 1.01–3.22, p = 0.043), body mass index (OR 1.15, CI 1.00–1.33, p = 0.04) and procedure duration (OR 1.02, CI 1.00–1.05, p = 0.049) were predictors of post-ERCP cholangitis. Biliary stone extraction using a balloon was found to be protective against cholangitis (OR 0.18, CI 0.05–0.60, p = 0.005). Sepsis rate related to post-ERCP cholangitis was 2.4% and death 1%. Conclusion: Patients who undergo ERCP procedures due to malignant bile duct stenosis, have a high ASA score and BMI, and have a long procedure time should be paid attention and closely monitored. Further research is needed to determine whether measures aimed at the identified risk factors will reduce the incidence of post-ERCP.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, H., KOÇYİĞİT, B. (2022). Predictors of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated cholangitis: a retrospective cohort study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 105–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/609232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Chak A, Cooper GS, Lloyd LE, Hammar PJ, Issa K et al. Effectiveness of ERCP in cholangitis: A community-based study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000
  2. 484–489. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.108410 2. Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, Egan J, Hirota WK et al. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005
  3. 1– 8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.015 3. Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2012
  4. 467–473. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.010 4. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007
  5. 1781–1788. doi: 10.1111/j.1572- 0241.2007.01279.x 5. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. New England Journal of Medicine 1996
  6. 909–918. doi: 10.1056/ NEJM199609263351301 6. Ishigaki T, Sasaki T, Serikawa M, Kobayashi K, Kamigaki M et al. Evaluation of antibiotic use to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and cholangitis. Hepatogastroenterology 2015
  7. 417–424 7. Lee JM, Lee SH, Jang DK, Chung KH, Park JM et al. Air cholangiography in endoscopic bilateral stent-in-stent placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Therapotic Advences in Gastroenterology 2015
  8. 189–198. doi: 10.1177/1756283X15618132 8. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976
  9. 314–320. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(76)80139-4 9. Desai R, Patel U, Doshi S, Zalavadia D, Siddiq W et al. A Nationwide Assessment of the “July Effect” and Predictors of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Sepsis at Urban Teaching Hospitals in the United States. Clinical Endoscopy 2019
  10. 486–496. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.190 10. Chen M, Wang L, Wang Y, Wei W, Yao Y-L et al. Risk factor analysis of post-ERCP cholangitis: A single-center experience. Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Disease International 2018
  11. 55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.002 11. Tierney J, Bhutiani N, Stamp B, Richey JS, Bahr MH et al. Predictive risk factors associated with cholangitis following ERCP. Surgical Endoscopy 2018
  12. 799–804. doi: 10.1007/ s00464-017-5746-z 12. Todani T, Narusue M, Watanabe Y, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Man