SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study

Bahattin Kerem AYDIN
Sadettin ÇİFTCİ
Fatih DURGUT
Erdem ŞAHİN
Pages
463–466
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative complications and overall survival of patients who underwent proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and patients who underwent cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty (CCRH) for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged 75 years and older.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative complications and overall survival of patients who underwent proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and patients who underwent cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty (CCRH) for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged 75 years and older.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: A total of 94 patients who underwent PFNA or CCRH between 2010 and 2012 because of femur fracture (A2.2 and A2.3 according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification) were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Both PFNA and CCRH techniques can be used for surgical treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative complications and overall survival of patients who underwent proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and patients who underwent cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty (CCRH) for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in patients aged 75 years and older. Materials and methods: A total of 94 patients who underwent PFNA or CCRH between 2010 and 2012 because of femur fracture (A2.2 and A2.3 according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification) were analyzed retrospectively. Hospitalization times, blood transfusion needs, reoperation rates, and overall survival were compared. Results: Forty-eight patients in the PFNA group and 46 patients in the CCRH group were included for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospitalization times, blood transfusion needs, reoperation rates, and survival rates. Conclusions: Both PFNA and CCRH techniques can be used for surgical treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, B. K., ÇİFTCİ, S., DURGUT, F., ŞAHİN, E. (2022). Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus cemented calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly: an overall survival study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 463–466. https://ajindex.com/articles/609216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Miyamoto RG, Kaplan KM, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008
  2. 16(10):596- 607. doi:10.5435/00124635-200810000-00005 2. Zuckerman JD. Hip fracture. The New England journal of medicine 1996
  3. 334(23):1519-1525. doi:10.1056/NEJM199606063342307 3. Lindskog DM, Baumgaertner MR. Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2004
  4. 12(3):179-190. doi:10.5435/00124635-200405000-00006 4. Kang SY, Lee EW, Kang KS, Lee S, Park YU et al. Mode of fixation failures of dynamic hip screw with TSP in the treatment of unstable proximal femur fracture: biomechanical analysis and a report of 3 cases. Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Surgeon 2006
  5. 41(1):176- 80. doi:10.4055/JKOA.2006.41.1.176 5. Setiobudi T, Ng YH, Lim CT, Liang S, Lee K, Das DS. Clinical outcome following treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2011
  6. 482–7. doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V40N11p482 6. Li J, Chen JK, Zhou K, Shen B, Ni XM, Chen L. Application of dynamic hip screw with modified reamer in intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology 2011
  7. 362–5. doi:10.3969/j. issn.1003-0034.2011.05.002 7. Kaplan K, Miyamoto R, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD. Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008
  8. 16(11):665-673. doi:10.5435/00124635-200811000-00007 8. Görmeli G, Korkmaz MF, Görmeli CA, Adanaş C, Karataş T, Şimşek SA. Comparison of femur intertrochanteric fracture fixation with hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail systems. Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery 2015
  9. 21(6):503-508. doi:10.5505/tjtes.2015.96166 9. Yang YH, Wang YR, Jiang SD, Jiang LS. Proximal femoral nail antirotation and third-generation Gamma nail: which is a better device for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures?. Singapore medical journal 2013
  10. 54(8):446-450. doi:10.11622/smedj.2013152 10. Chan KC, Gill GS. Cemented hemiarthroplasties for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2000
  11. :206-215. doi:10.1097/00003086-200002000-00025 11. Tronzo RG.