Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on diaphragm thickness and contractility in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Pages
89–96
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The 6-weeks of PR resulted in a significant increase in dt without a significant difference in diaphragm contractility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Studies are showing that pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) increases diaphragmatic excursion by decreasing hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: All subjects participated in an out-patient PR of 6 weeks and 3 sessions per week prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The 6-weeks of PR resulted in a significant increase in dt without a significant difference in diaphragm contractility.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Studies are showing that pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) increases diaphragmatic excursion by decreasing hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is a lack of knowledge about its effects on the diaphragm thickness (dt) and contractility. This study aims to evaluate the dt and contractility before and after PR in patients with COPD. Materials and methods: All subjects participated in an out-patient PR of 6 weeks and 3 sessions per week prospectively. Dyspnea severity, the disease-specific quality of life (St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire-SGRQ), pulmonary function tests (PFT), exercise capacity, the dt at the end of the expiration and at maximal inspiration (B-mode ultrasound) were evaluated at baseline and after PR. Results: A total of 34 patients with a mean age and FEV1 61.05 ± 8.22 years and 57.9 ± 20.4% predicted respectively showed improvements in exercise capacity and some items of PFT and SGRQ. Diaphragmatic thickness at the end of the expiration also significantly improved regardless of the disease severity and was positively correlated with functional performance. The 6-weeks of PR didn’t result in a significant difference in diaphragm contractility. Conclusion: The 6-weeks of PR resulted in a significant increase in dt without a significant difference in diaphragm contractility.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTÜR, Y. K., GENÇ, A., KAYA, A., ÇİFTÇİ, F., GÜNEŞ, S., HAYME, S. (2022). Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on diaphragm thickness and contractility in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 89–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/609212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Hogg JC. Pathophysiology of airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet 2004
  2. 364 (9435): 709- 721. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16900-6 2. Similowski T, Yan S, Gauthier AP, Macklem PT, Bellemare F. Contractile properties of the human diaphragm during chronic hyperinflation. The New England Journal of Medicine 1991
  3. 325 (13): 917-923. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109263251304 3. Barreiro E, de la Puente B, Minguella J, Corominas JM, Serrano S et al. Oxidative stress and respiratory muscle dysfunction in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2005
  4. 171 (10): 1116–1124. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200407-887OC 4. Ottenheijm CA, Heunks LM, Dekhuijzen PN. Diaphragm muscle fiber dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: toward a pathophysiological concept. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2007
  5. 175 (12): 1233-1240. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200701-020PP 5. Okura K, Iwakura M, Shibata K, Kawagoshi A, Sugawara K et al. Diaphragm thickening assessed by ultrasonography is lower than healthy adults in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Clinical Respiratory Journal 2020
  6. 14 (6): 521-526. doi: 10.1111/crj.13161 6. Boon AJ, Harper CJ, Ghahfarokhi LS, Strommen JA, Watson JC, Sorenson EJ. Two-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the diaphragm: quantitative values in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2013
  7. 47 (6): 884-889. doi: 10.1002/mus.23702 7. McCool FD, Conomos P, Benditt JO, Cohn D, Sherman CB, Hoppin FG. Maximal inspiratory pressures and dimensions of the diaphragm. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1997
  8. 155 (4): 1329-1334. doi: 10.1164/ ajrccm.155.4.9105075 8. Baria MR, Shahgholi L, Sorenson EJ, Harper CJ, Lim KG et al. B Mode ultrasound assessment of diaphragm structure and function in patients with COPD. Chest 2014
  9. 146 (3): 680-685. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2306 9. Ogan N, Aydemir Y, Evrin T, Ataç GK, Baha A et al. Diaphragmatic thickness in chronic obstructive lung disease and relationship with clinical severity parameters. Turkish Journal of Medical Science 2019
  10. 49 (4): 1073-1078. doi: 10.3906/sag-1901-164 10. McCarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, Murphy K, Murphy E, Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015
  11. CD003793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3 11. Ries AL, Kaplan RM, Limberg TM, Prewit LM. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on p