Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Arthroscopic Bankart repair improves upper limb exercise capacity, shoulder function and quality of life

Pages
683–690
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Clinicians should use the exercise capacity assessment for the evaluation of the recovery of shoulder function after providing stabilization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Anterior glenohumeral instability is an important cause of shoulder disability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The patient group included a total of 11 males between the ages of 18 and 40 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Clinicians should use the exercise capacity assessment for the evaluation of the recovery of shoulder function after providing stabilization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Anterior glenohumeral instability is an important cause of shoulder disability. The aim of the present study was to investigate arm exercise capacity in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability before and after arthroscopic Bankart repair and to compare the results with those of healthy controls. Materials and methods: The patient group included a total of 11 males between the ages of 18 and 40 years. The control group consisted of 13 healthy males with an age range of 23 to 41 years. An incremental arm crank exercise test was performed to determine upper limb exercise capacity, as expressed by peak oxygen consumption $(VO_{2peak})$. The shoulder function of the patients was evaluated by the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), and the quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36 (SF-36). All evaluations were performed preoperatively, and at the postop $3^{rd}$ and 6th months. Results: The patient group had lower $VO_{2peak}$ and exhaustion duration at the preoperative assessment (p = 0.025 and p = 0.007, respectively). SF-36 domains were lower in patients (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in $VO_{2peak}$ between preoperative and postop $6^{th}-month$ measurements and between postop $3^{rd} and 6^{th}-month$ measurements (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The total WOSI score increased from preoperative 50.27% to 57.77% at the postop 3rd month, and to 65.56% at the final follow-up. Although improvements were detected in all SF-36 domains at postop follow-ups, they were not statistically significant except role limitations due to the physical problems domain (p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between controls and patients at the postop $3^{rd}$ and 6th months with regard to exercise test parameters except the peak rating of perceived exertion. Conclusion: Shoulder function, exercise capacity, and quality of life were lower in the patient group and improved after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Clinicians should use the exercise capacity assessment for the evaluation of the recovery of shoulder function after providing stabilization.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, D. D., ÖZTUNA, F. V., DAĞ, F., ÇİMEN, Ö. B. (2022). Arthroscopic Bankart repair improves upper limb exercise capacity, shoulder function and quality of life. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 683–690. https://ajindex.com/articles/609208

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Pickett Adam MD, Svoboda Steven M. Anterior Glenohumeral Instability. Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review 2017
  2. 25 (3): 156-162. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000157 2. Brockmeier SF, Voos JE, Williams RJ, Altchek DW, Cordasco FA et al. Hospital for Special Surgery Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service. Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of typeII SLAP lesions. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2009
  3. 91 (7): 1595– 1603. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00205 3. Augustsson SR, Klintberg IH, Svantesson U, Sernert N. Clinical evaluation of muscle function, quality of life and functional capacity after shoulder surgery. Advances in Physiotherapy 2012
  4. 14 (1): 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3109/14038196.2012.6 60988 4. Tahta M, Akmeşe R, Özberk ZN, Coşkun OO, Işik Ç et al. Muscle strength and function of shoulders with Bankart lesion after successful arthroscopic treatment: inter limb comparison 24 months after surgery. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2013
  5. 133 (12): 1711–1718. doi:10.1007/s00402-013- 1859-6 5. Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdock H, Will E, Graham C. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2006
  6. 88 (11): 2326-2336. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01327 6. Uri O, Pritsch M, Oran A, Liebermann DG. Upper limb kinematics after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization. The Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2015
  7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.006 7. Buckwalter JA, Wolf BR, Glass N, Bollier M, Kuhn JE et al. Early return to baseline range of motion and strength after anterior shoulder instability surgery: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) shoulder group cohort study. The Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2018
  8. 27 (7): 1235– 1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.035 8. Rhee YG, Ha JH, Cho NS. Anterior shoulder stabilization in collision athletes: Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2006
  9. 979–985. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505283267 9. Leicht AS, Sealey RM, Sinclair WH. The reliability of VO2peak determination in healthy females during an incremental arm ergometry test. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2009
  10. 30 (7): 509–515. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1202351 10. Gerometta A, Rosso C, Klouche S, Hardy P. Arthroscopic Bankart shoulder stabilization in athletes: return to sports and functional outcomes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, A