Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 6

Retrospective evaluation of seven different treatment protocols in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Pages
2835–2849
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analysis of prognostic factors affecting overall survival revealed that the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation increased mortality [11.1 times (p < 0.001) and 6.48 times (p < 0.001), respectively].

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: As the experience has increased regarding SARS-CoV-2 in time, treatment trends have changed since the beginning of the pandemic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Individuals aged 18 years and above who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in PCR with presenting COVIDrelated radiological findings, hospitalized for at least 3 days, and completed follow-up between March 15, 2020 and November 30, 2020 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analysis of prognostic factors affecting overall survival revealed that the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation increased mortality [11.1 times (p < 0.001) and 6.48 times (p < 0.001), respectively].
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: As the experience has increased regarding SARS-CoV-2 in time, treatment trends have changed since the beginning of the pandemic. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of different treatment modalities for inpatients in a tertiary pandemic hospital in Antalya, Turkey. Materials and methods: Individuals aged 18 years and above who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in PCR with presenting COVIDrelated radiological findings, hospitalized for at least 3 days, and completed follow-up between March 15, 2020 and November 30, 2020 were included in the study. Patients’ data were reviewed retrospectively. Seven treatment groups based on the single or combined use of hydroxychloroquine, oseltamivir, favipiravir, and remdesivir were formed and compared in terms of mortality, survival, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care, and mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 321 patients were included in the study. The length of hospital stay, the need for intensive care, and mechanical ventilation were lower in Group 1 (hydroxychloroquine) and Group 2 (hydroxychloroquine + oseltamivir) compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was determined in survival between treatment groups. Analysis of prognostic factors affecting overall survival revealed that the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation increased mortality [11.1 times (p < 0.001) and 6.48 times (p < 0.001), respectively]. Conclusion: No significant difference was determined between different treatment protocols in terms of their impact on survival. To end the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need to develop highly efficient, rapid-acting, and orally available antiviral drugs.Key words: COVID-19, treatment, favipiravir, remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine

🔖

Cite This Article

SEYMAN, D., ÖZTOPRAK, N., KESKİN, A. S., ÖNDER, K. D., BERK, H. (2022). Retrospective evaluation of seven different treatment protocols in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 6, 2835–2849. https://ajindex.com/articles/609186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Batırel A. Specific treatment of COVID-19. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia 2020
  2. 31–41. doi: 10.14744/scie.2020.57704 2. Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, Diaz G, Asperges E et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe COVID-19. New England Journal of Medicine 2020
  3. 2327–2336. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2007016 3. Pekcevik Y, Belet U. Patient management in the radiology department, the role of chest imaging during the SARSCoV-2 pandemic and chest CT findings related to COVID-19 pneumonia. Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi 2020
  4. doi: 10.5222/terh.2020.13549 4. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. The Lancet 2020
  5. 507–513. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7 5. Wu J, Li W, Shi X, Chen Z, Jiang B et al. Early antiviral treatment contributes to alleviate the severity and improve the prognosis of patients with novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Journal of Internal Medicine 2020
  6. 128–138. doi:10.1111/ joim.13063 6. Tadic M, Cuspidi C, Grassi G, Mancia G. COVID-19 and arterial hypertension: hypothesis or evidence? Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2020
  7. 1120–1126. doi:10.1111/ jch.13925 7. Taylor EH, Hofmeyr R, Torborg A, van Tonder C, Boden R et al. Risk factors and interventions associated with mortality or survival in adult COVID-19 patients admitted to critical care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2020
  8. 116–127. doi: 10.36303/SAJAA.2020.26.3.2428 8. Gao YD, Ding M, Dong X, Zhang JJ, Azkur AK et al. Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: A review. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2021
  9. 428–455. doi:10.1111/all.14657 9. Szente Fonseca SN, de Queiroz Sousa A, Wolkoff AG, Moreira MS, Pinto BC et al. Risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 outpatients treated with various drug regimens in Brazil: comparative analysis. Travel Medicine and Infectious Diseases 2020
  10. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101906 10. Van Halem K, Bruyndonckx R, Van der Hilst J, Cox J, Driesen P et al. Risk factors for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic in Belgium: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases 2020
  11. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05605-3 11. Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Hirsch Shumaker A, Lavergne V, Baden L et al. Infectious Diseases Society of Ameri