SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Mathematics / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

A new method for obtaining the inconsistent elements in a decision table based on dominance principle

Ahmet TOPAL
Yasemen UÇAN
Nilgün GÜLER BAYAZIT
Pages
561–568
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also express the computational complexitycomparisons of the proposed method with general method in terms of the number of set intersection operations and thereal number comparison operations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, using only the dominance relation, we propose a set defining inconsistent elements in the decisiontable.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, we show the accuracy of our proposition with an example.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also express the computational complexitycomparisons of the proposed method with general method in terms of the number of set intersection operations and thereal number comparison operations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, using only the dominance relation, we propose a set defining inconsistent elements in the decisiontable. Then, we show the accuracy of our proposition with an example. We also express the computational complexitycomparisons of the proposed method with general method in terms of the number of set intersection operations and thereal number comparison operations.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPAL, A., UÇAN, Y., BAYAZIT, N. G. (2022). A new method for obtaining the inconsistent elements in a decision table based on dominance principle. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 561–568. https://ajindex.com/articles/608795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Multicriteria classification by dominance-based rough set approach. Università degli studi, 2000
  2. Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2001; 129: 1-47
  3. Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough approximation by dominance relations. International Journals of Intelligent Systems 2002; 17 (2): 153-171
  4. Janos D, Thi VD, Giang NL. On finding all reducts of consistent decision tables. Cybernetics and Information Technologies 2014; 14 (4): 3-10
  5. Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W. (Eds.). Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence. New York, USA: Springer, 2015
  6. Liou, JJ, Tzeng GH. A dominance-based rough set approach to customer behavior in the airline market. Information Sciences 2010; 180 (11): 2230-2238
  7. Molodtsov D. Soft set theory-first results. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 1999; 37 (4-5): 19-31
  8. Pawlak Z. Rough set. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences 1982; 11 (5): 341-356
  9. Pawlak Z, Skowron A. Rough membership functions: a tool for reasoning with uncertainty. Algebraic Methods in Logic and in Computer Science 1993; Banach Center Publications, 28, institute of mathematics polish academy of sciences warszawa, 135-150
  10. Salama, AS. Some topological properties of rough sets with tools for data mining. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI) 2011; 8(3): 588-594
  11. Słowiński R, Stefanowski J, Greco S, Matarazzo B. Rough set based processing of inconsistent information in decision analysis. Control and Cybernetics 2000; 29 (1): 379-404
  12. Yang X, Yang J. Incomplete information system and rough set theory. Models and attribute reductions. Science Press: Springer, 2012
  13. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965; 8 (3): 338-353
  14. Zaras K. The dominance-based rough set approach (DRSA) applied to bankruptcy prediction modeling for small and medium businesses. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2011; 287-295.