Also, we prove that such a surface contains a finite number of geodesics which connect its singular points so that when we cut the surface through these arcs we get a flat disc with a nonsingular interior.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An ideal triangulation of a singular flat surface is a geodesic triangulation such that its vertex set is equal to the set of singular points of the surface.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using the fact that each pair of points in a surface has a finite number of geodesics having length ≤ L connecting them, where L is any positive number, we prove that each singular flat surface has an ideal triangulation provided that the surface has singular points when it has no boundary components, or each of its boundary components has a singular point.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, we prove that such a surface contains a finite number of geodesics which connect its singular points so that when we cut the surface through these arcs we get a flat disc with a nonsingular interior.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
An ideal triangulation of a singular flat surface is a geodesic triangulation such that its vertex set is equal to the set of singular points of the surface. Using the fact that each pair of points in a surface has a finite number of geodesics having length ≤ L connecting them, where L is any positive number, we prove that each singular flat surface has an ideal triangulation provided that the surface has singular points when it has no boundary components, or each of its boundary components has a singular point. Also, we prove that such a surface contains a finite number of geodesics which connect its singular points so that when we cut the surface through these arcs we get a flat disc with a nonsingular interior.
🔖
Cite This Article
SAĞLAM, İ. (2022). Ideal triangulation and disc unfolding of a singular flat surface. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 1635–1648. https://ajindex.com/articles/607382
Burago D, Burago Y, Ivanov S. A course in metric geometry. Providence, RI, USA: Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 33. American Mathematical Society, 2001
Farb B, Margalit D. A Primer on Mapping Class Groups. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2012
Fillastre F. From spaces of polygons to spaces of polyhedra following Bavard, Ghys and Thurston. L’Enseigenement Mathématique, 2011; 57 (1): 23-56. doi: 10.4171/LEM/57-1-2 [5] Indermitte C, Liebling TM, Clémençon H, Troyanov M. Voronoi Diagrams on piecewise flat surfaces and an application to biological growth. Theoretical Computer Science, 2001; 263 (1-2): 263-274. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00248- 6 [6] Izmestiev I. A simple proof of an isoperimetric inequality for Euclidean and hyperbolic cone-surfaces. Differential Geometry and its Applications, 2015; 43: 95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.difgeo.2015.09.007 [7] Hubert P, Schmidt T. An introduction to Veech surfaces. In: Hasselblatt B, Katok A (editors). Handbook of dynamical systems 1B. North-Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 501-526
Papadopoulos A, Théret G. On Teichmüller’s metric and Thurston’s asymmetric metric. In: Papadopoulos A (editor). Handbook of Teichmüller Theory 1. Zurich, Switzerland: European Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 111-204
Sağlam İ. Complete flat cone metrics on punctured surfaces. Turkish Journal of Mathematics, 2019; 43: 813-832. doi: 10.3906/mat-1806-23 [10] Tahar G. Geometric triangulations and flips, Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 2019; 357 (7): 620-623. doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2019.07.001 [11] Thurston WP. Shapes of polyhedra and triangulations of the sphere. Geometry and Topology Monographs, 1998, 1: 511-549. doi: 10.2140/gtm.1998.1.511 [12] Thurston WP. Three-dimensional geometry and topology. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1997
Troyanov M. Les surfaces euclidienne a singularites coniques, L’Enseignement Mathématique, 1986, 32 (1-2): 79-94 (in French). doi: 10.5169/seals-55079 [14] Troyanov M. On the moduli space of singular Euclidean surfaces. In: Papadopoulos A (editor). Handbook of Teichmuller Theory 1. Zurich, Switzerland: European Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 507-540.