SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Secondary Traumatic Stress and Social Problem-Solving Skills of School Counselors

Okul Psikolojik Danışmanlarının İkincil Travmatik Stres ve Sosyal Problem Çözme Becerileri Arasındaki İlişki

Ayşegül ERÇEVİK
Pages
1054–1071
Publication Date
2019-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, while negative problem orientation was found a positive predictor of the school counselors’ secondary traumatic stress levels, positive problem orientation, rational problem solving, impulsive-careless style and avoidant style were not significant predictor of the secondary traumatic stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between school psychological counselors’ secondary traumatic stress and social problem-solving levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of this research was consisted of 268 school psychological counselors who were working affiliated to Turkey Ministry of National Education in Amasya, İstanbul and Samsun.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, while negative problem orientation was found a positive predictor of the school counselors’ secondary traumatic stress levels, positive problem orientation, rational problem solving, impulsive-careless style and avoidant style were not significant predictor of the secondary traumatic stress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Okul psikolojik danışmanı · Travma · İkincil travmatik stres

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between school psychological counselors’ secondary traumatic stress and social problem-solving levels. The sample of this research was consisted of 268 school psychological counselors who were working affiliated to Turkey Ministry of National Education in Amasya, İstanbul and Samsun. Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale and Social Problem Solving Inventory were used as data collection tools in this study. As a result of the research, while there were significant positive correlations between participants’ the secondary traumatic stress levels and negative problem orientation, impulsive-careless style, avoidance style dimensions of the social problem solving, there were not significant correlations between positive problem orientation and rational problem-solving style of the social problem solving. Another finding of the study, as psychological counselors’ level of social problem solving increased, secondary traumatic stress levels were found to decreased. As psychological counselors’ levels of negative problem orientation, impulsive-careless style and avoidance styles were increased, secondary traumatic stress levels were found to increased. Finally, while negative problem orientation was found a positive predictor of the school counselors’ secondary traumatic stress levels, positive problem orientation, rational problem solving, impulsive-careless style and avoidant style were not significant predictor of the secondary traumatic stress.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı okul psikolojik danışmanlarının ikincil travmatik stres ve sosyal problem çözme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bu araştırmanın örneklemi Amasya, İstanbul ve Samsun’da Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı’na bağlı olarak çalışmakta olan 268 psikolojik danışmandan oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak İTSÖ ve SPÇE kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda katılımcıların ikincil travmatik stress düzeyleri ile sosyal problem çözmenin negatif problem yönelimi, içtepisel-dikkatsiz stil, kaçınan stil boyutları arasında pozitif yönlü anlamlı ilişkiler bulunurken; pozitif problem yönelimi ve[1] akılcı problem çözme stili ile anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmamıştır. Psikolojik danışmanların problem çözme becerileri arttıkça, ikincil travmatik stress düzeylerinin azaldığı bulunmuştur. Psikolojik danışmanların negatif problem yönelimi, içtepisel/dikkatsiz stil ve kaçınan stil düzeyleri arttıkça ikincil travmatik stress düzeylerinin arttığı bulunmuştur. Son olarak, negatif problem yönelimi okul psikolojik danışmanlarının ikincil travmatik stress düzeylerinin pozitif anlamlı yordayıcısı iken; pozitif problem yönelim, akılcı problem çözme, içtepisel-dikkatsiz stil ve kaçınan stilin ikincil travmatik stress düzeylerinin anlamlı bir yordayıcısı değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERÇEVİK, A. (2019). The Relationship Between Secondary Traumatic Stress and Social Problem-Solving Skills of School Counselors. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 1054–1071. https://ajindex.com/articles/6073

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, K. B., & Riggs, S. A. (2008). An exploratory study of vicarious trauma among therapist trainees. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2, 26–34.
  2. Anderson, D.G. (2000). Coping strategies and burnout amaong veteran child protection workers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(6), 839-848. APA (n.d.). Trauma. http://www.apa.org/topics/trauma/ (Date of access, August 18, 2018).
  3. Bell, A.C., & D’Zurilla, T.J. (2009). The influence of social problem-solving acility on the relationship between daily stress and adjustment. Cogn Ther Res, 33, 439-448.
  4. Braird, K., & Kracen, A.C. (2006). Vicarious traumatization and secondary traumatic stress: A research synthesis. Counselling Psychology Quaertly, 19(2), 181-188.
  5. Bride, E.B., Robinson, M.M., Yegidis, B., & Figley, C.R. (2004). Development and validation of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(1), 27-35.
  6. Clum, G.A.; Patsiokas, A.T., & Luscomb, R.L. (1979). Emprically based comprehensive treatment program for parasuicide. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47(5), 937-945.
  7. Çolak, B., Şişmanlar, Ş. G., Karakaya, I., Etiler, N., & Biçer, Ü. (2012). Çocuk cinsel istismarı olgularını değerlendiren meslek gruplarında dolaylı travmatizasyon. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13, 51-58.
  8. Dunkley, J., & Whelan, T.A. (2006). Vicarious traumatisation: Current status and future directions. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 34(1), 107-118.
  9. D'Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (1990). Development and preliminary evaluation of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2(2), 156-163. D’Zurilla, T.J., & Nezu, A.M. (2006). Solving life’s problems: A 5-step guide to enhanced well-being. Springer Publishing Company. D’Zurilla, T.J., Nezu, A.M., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2004). Social problem solving: Theory and assessment. In E.C.Chang, T.J. D’Zurilla ve L.J. Sanna (Eds.), Social problem solving: Theory, research and training, Washington: American Psychological Association, (pp.11-27).
  10. Eskin, M. (2014). Sorun Çözme Terapisi (3th Ed.). Ankara:
  11. HYB Yayıncılık. Eskin, M. ve Aycan, Z. (2009). Gözden geçirilmiş Sosyal Problem Çözme Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye (Tr-SSÇE-G) Uyarlanması, güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 12(23), 1-10.
  12. Esposito, C.L. ve Clum, G.A. (2002). Social support and problem solving as moderators of the relationship between childhood abuse and suicidality: Application to a delinquen