Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2011 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Karyotypic studies on some genotypes of hull-less barley (hordeum vulgare l.)

Pages
245–250
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cluster analysis was carried out for either chromosomal parameters classifying in 3 classes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Karyotypic studies were carried out on 16 hull-less barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes, using squash technique and Aceto-orcein staining method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Chromosomal parameters examined were as follows: long arm (L), short arm (S), total chromosome length (TL), arm ratio (AR), r-value (S/L), form percentage of chromosome (%F), Chromosome volume, relative length of chromosome (%RL) and the number of satellites. $ ANOVA{^i}$ indicated high significant differences for all karyotypic parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cluster analysis was carried out for either chromosomal parameters classifying in 3 classes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Karyotypic studies were carried out on 16 hull-less barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes, using squash technique and Aceto-orcein staining method. Chromosomal parameters examined were as follows: long arm (L), short arm (S), total chromosome length (TL), arm ratio (AR), r-value (S/L), form percentage of chromosome (%F), Chromosome volume, relative length of chromosome (%RL) and the number of satellites. $ ANOVA{^i}$ indicated high significant differences for all karyotypic parameters. Genotypes tested were diploid (2n=2x=14). Satellite numbers were differed, ranging from 1 to 2 pairs and were differed in satellite length. The most chromatin length were detected in G9 (73.37 μm) while G15 demonstrated the least (30.85 μm). The types of chromosomes were determined as m in all genotypes, using Levan’s chromosome nomenclature. Karyotypes were classified in 1A of Stebbin’s classification. In addition to this, to test the karyotypic symmetry in more detail, other parameters, e.g. Romero-Zarco, total form percentage of karyotype (%TF), symmetry index (%S), coefficient of variation (%CV), dispersion index (DI) were also considered. For instance, in Romero-Zarco method, the A1 and A2 coefficients were 0.37 (G2) and 0.46 (G9), respectively. The first 3 principal component analysis PCA justified %94 of the total variations correlation determined for cytogenetical parameters. Cluster analysis was carried out for either chromosomal parameters classifying in 3 classes.

🔖

Cite This Article

GHAFFARIPOUR, S., KARIMIZADEH, R., MOHAMMADI, M., SUQ, H. S., SHEFAZADEH, M. K., MOHAMMADI, N. (2022). Karyotypic studies on some genotypes of hull-less barley (hordeum vulgare l.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 245–250. https://ajindex.com/articles/605900

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ahsan, A., A. Vahidy, and B. Jahan, 1998. Karyological studies in some species of Hordeum vulgare. L. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 30: 14-16.
  2. Bakhshi Khaniki, G., and M.A. Ebrahim, 2000. Karyological studies of Allium kunthianum (Allaceae). The Nucleus, 43: 129-131.
  3. Bhatty, R.S., 1997. Milling of regular and waxy starch hull-less barleys for the production of bran and flour. Cereal Chemistry, 74: 693–699.
  4. Bhatty, R.S., 1999. The potential of hull-less barley. Cereal Chemistry, 76: 589–599.
  5. Bhatty, R.S., and B.G. Rossnagel, 1997. Zero amylase lines of hullless barley. Cereal Chemistry, 74: 190–191.
  6. Gennur, M.N., A.F. Habib, and G. Kadapa, 1988. Karyomorphological studies of nine Asiatic cotton I. karyotypic analysis of species and races of Asiatic cottons based on chromatin content. Cytologia, 53: 79-106.
  7. Kihara, H., 1992. Cytologische und Genetische bei Wichtigen Betreidearten mi Besonderer Rucksich anf dan Varhalten der Chromosomen und die Sterilitat in den Bestarden. Men. Coll. Kyto Imp. University of Ser. B. L., 1-200.
  8. Kremer, R and M. Ben-hammouda, 2009. Allelopathic Plants. 19. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Allelopathy Journal, 24: 225-242.
  9. Lewitsky, G.A., 1931. The morphology of the chromosomes. Bull. Appl. Botany, 27: 153-173.
  10. Liu, C.T., D.M. Wesenberg, C.W. Hunt, A.L. Branen, L.D. Robertson, D.E. Burrup, K.L. Dempster, and Haggetry, R.J., 2001. Hull-less barley: A new look of barley in Idaho. Cis 1050. Mirzaie-Nedoushan, H., A.R. Zebarjadi, and G. Karimzadeh, 2000. Karyotypic investigations of some Bromus tomentellus populations and their karyotypic corroletions. Iranian Journal of Botany, 8: 287-298.
  11. Mohanty B.D, P.D. Ghosh, and S. Maity, 1991. Chromosomal analysis in cultured cells of barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.): Structural alterations in chromosomes. Cytologia, 56: 191-197.
  12. Pei-sheng, M., H. Ying, H.W. Xin-guo, M. Lin, M. Pei-chun, and Z. Guo-fang, 2010. Cytological evaluation and karyotype analysis in plant germplasms of elytrigia desv. Agricultural sciences in China, 9: 1553-1560
  13. Ramesh, B., V.P. Singh, and G.L. Stebbins, 1998. Somatic karyotype analysis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Indian Journal of Genetic and Plant Breeding, 56: 248-255.
  14. Raven, P.H., 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: cytology. Annual Missouri Botanical Gard. 62: 724-764.
  15. Sheidai, M., 2000. Karyotypic study of Echinops (Asteraceae) in Fars Province, Iran. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 134: 453-463.
  16. Stebbins, J.L., 1973. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plan