SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Determination of endogenous hormone levels in Ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr.] susceptible and resistant chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)

Salih ULGER
Mustafa KARHAN
M. İlhan CAGIRGAN
Cengiz TOKER
Pages
5–9
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the statistically significant genotypic effects only for zeatin and GA3, these hormones may be used as biochemical markers to determine resistance to ascochyta blight of chickpea genotypes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ascochyta blight, caused by Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr., is the most important foliar disease of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in many countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:ILC 263, (susceptible to ascochyta blight), FLIP 95-60C and FLIP 98-224C (resistant to ascochyta blight) were used to determine the level of plant hormones; indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), zeatin, gibberellic acid 3 (GA3), and abscisic acid (ABA).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the statistically significant genotypic effects only for zeatin and GA3, these hormones may be used as biochemical markers to determine resistance to ascochyta blight of chickpea genotypes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ascochyta blight, caused by Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr., is the most important foliar disease of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in many countries. Many studies have been carried out on basis of population biology and host-plant resistance of A. rabiei, but the effect of endogenous plant hormone levels on resistance to ascochyta blight of chickpea has been studied rarely. Therefore, the study was designed to compare endogenous plant hormone levels in ascochyta blight susceptible and resistant chickpea genotypes under ascochyta blight infected conditions. ILC 263, (susceptible to ascochyta blight), FLIP 95-60C and FLIP 98-224C (resistant to ascochyta blight) were used to determine the level of plant hormones; indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), zeatin, gibberellic acid 3 (GA3), and abscisic acid (ABA). Concentrations of IAA, zeatin, GA3 and ABA were markedly increased in pods of resistant genotypes, FLIP 95-60C and FLIP 98-224C. It was suggested that high zeatin and GA3 concentrations in pods could be detected as biochemical markers to determine resistance to ascochyta blight of chickpea genotypes since the genotypic effect was statistically significant only for zeatin and GA3. Considering the statistically significant genotypic effects only for zeatin and GA3, these hormones may be used as biochemical markers to determine resistance to ascochyta blight of chickpea genotypes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULGER, S., KARHAN, M., CAGIRGAN, M. İ., TOKER, C. (2022). Determination of endogenous hormone levels in Ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr.] susceptible and resistant chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 5–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/605881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmed, H.U., Hwang, S.F., Gossen, B.D., Chang, K.F., Howard, R.J., Strelkov, S.E., Turnbull, G.D. 2009. Adaptation to host (chickpea) genotype by isolates of Didymella rabiei following repeated cycles of infection. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 116: 177-181.
  2. Atik, O., Baum, M., El-Ahmed, A., Ahmed, S., Abang, M.M., Yabrak, M.M., Murad, S., Kabbabeh, S., Hamwieh, A. 2011. Chickpea Ascochyta Blight: Disease Status and Pathogen Mating Type Distribution in Syria. J. Phytopathol. 159: 443-449. Auckland A.K., 1977. Breeding chickpea at ICRISAT. In: Induced Mutations for the Improvement of Grain Legumes in South East Asia (1975). In: Proceedings of A South East Asia Regional Seminar, IAEA-203, 8-13 December 1975, Colombo. pp.133-140.
  3. Aujla, S.S. 1964. Study on eleven isolates of Phyllostica rabiei (Pass.) Trot., the causal agent of gram blight in the Punjab. Indian Phytopahol. 17: 83-87.
  4. Bayraktar, H., Dolar, F.S., Tör, M. 2007. Determination of genetic diversity within Aschoctyta raibiei (Pass.) Labr., the cause of ascochyta blight of chickpea in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 89: 341-347.
  5. Cagirgan, M.I., Toker, C., Karhan, M., Aksu, M., Ulger, S., Canci, H. 2011. Assessment of endogenous organic acid levels in ascochyta blight [Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr.] susceptible and resistant chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Turkish J. Field Crops. 16(2):121-124.
  6. Davies, J. 1995. The plant hormones: Their nature, occurrence, and functions. In: Davies, J. (Ed.), Plant Hormones: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, pp. 1-12.
  7. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  8. AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Grewal, J.S. 1984. Evidence of physiological races in Ascochyta rabiei of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In: Saxena, M.C., Singh, K.B. (Eds.), Ascochyta Blight and Winter Sowing of Chickpeas, pp: 55-65. Martinus Nijhoff/DR W. Junk Publishers,
  9. The Netherlands. Haware, M.P., van Rheenen, H.A., Prasad, S.S. 1995. Screening for ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea under controlled environment and field conditions. Plant Dis. 79: 132-135.
  10. Freed, R., Einensmith, S.P., Guetz, D., Reicosky, D., Smail, V.W., Volberg, P. 1989. User’s Guide to MSTATC, An analysis of agronomic research experiments. Michigan State University. U.S.A. ICARDA. 1993. Legume Program. Annual Report for 1993.
  11. Aleppo, Syria. ICARDA. 1998. Germplasm Program Legumes. Annual Report for 1998.
  12. Aleppo, Syria. ICARDA. 1999. Germplasm Program. Annual Report for 1999.
  13. Aleppo, Syria. Jameson, P. 2000. Cytokinins and auxins in plant-pathogen i