SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Groat element concentration at different spikelets of oat panicles (Avena sativa L.) evaluated at three Turkish locations

Mevlut AKCURA
Ziya DUMLUPINAR
Ali Riza DEMIRKIRAN
Aydin AKKAYA
Rukiye KARA
Tevrican DOKUYUCU
Pages
157–165
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that grain number (GNP) and grain weight per panicle (GWP) were significant for locations (L), genotypes (G) and spikelet groups (SG).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out to determine the variation in spikelet groups, genotypes and environments for macronutrient (Ca, Mg and K) and micronutrient (Na, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) concentrations of oat (Avena sativa L.) groat.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The panicles of 16 Turkish oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes were obtained from three locations; Kahramanmaras, Konya and Cumra in Turkey in 2002-2003 cropping year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that grain number (GNP) and grain weight per panicle (GWP) were significant for locations (L), genotypes (G) and spikelet groups (SG).
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2002-2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the variation in spikelet groups, genotypes and environments for macronutrient (Ca, Mg and K) and micronutrient (Na, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) concentrations of oat (Avena sativa L.) groat. The panicles of 16 Turkish oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes were obtained from three locations; Kahramanmaras, Konya and Cumra in Turkey in 2002-2003 cropping year. The panicles of each variety were divided into three spikelet groups as basal spikelet (BS), central spikelet (CS) and apical spikelet (AS). The oat groats belonging to spikelet groups were pooled to determine macronutrient and micronutrient concentrations. The results indicate that grain number (GNP) and grain weight per panicle (GWP) were significant for locations (L), genotypes (G) and spikelet groups (SG). Genotypes were significantly different for Ca, Mg and K concentrations. Locations had significant effect on Ca and Mg concentrations while there were not any significantly differences for spikelet groups. Locations had significantly effect on micronutrient concentrations (Na, Cu, Mn and Zn) except Fe concentration of oat groats. Genotypes were significantly different for all micronutrient concentrations, while spikelet groups were significant for only Zn concentrations. Location x genotype (L x G) interaction was significant for all micronutrient concentrations, while L x G interaction was significant for Ca and Mg concentrations in macronutrients.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKCURA, M., DUMLUPINAR, Z., DEMIRKIRAN, A. R., AKKAYA, A., KARA, R., DOKUYUCU, T. (2022). Groat element concentration at different spikelets of oat panicles (Avena sativa L.) evaluated at three Turkish locations. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 157–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/605877

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Brown, J.C., M.E. Mc Daniel, 1978. Factors associated with differential response to two oat genotypes to zinc and copper stress. Crop Sci., 18: 817-820.
  2. Buerstmayr, H., N. Krenn, U. Stephan, H. Grausgruber, E. Zechner, 2007. Agronomic performance and quality of oat (Avena sativa l.) genotypes of worldwide origin produced under central European growing conditions. Field Crops Res., 101:343-351.
  3. Calderini, D.F., I. Ortiz-Monasterio, 2003. Grain position affects grain macronutrient and micronutrient concentrations in wheat. Crop Sci., 43:141-151.
  4. Chapko, L.B., M.A. Brinkman, 1991. Interrelationships between panicle weight, grain yield, and grain yield components in oat. Crop Sci., 31:878-882.
  5. Clark, R.B., 1983. Plant genotype differences in uptake, translocation, accumulation, and use of mineral elements required for plant growth. Plant and Soil, 72: 175-196.
  6. Demirbas, A., 2005. ß-Glucan and mineral nutrient contents of cereals grown in Turkey. Food Chemistry, 90: 773-777.
  7. Douglas, C.D., M.S. McMullen, J.J. Hammond, 2001. Genotypic and environmental effects on grain yield and quality of oat grown in North Dakota. Crop Sci., 41:1066-1072.
  8. Graham, R.D., 1978. Tolerance of triticale, wheat and rye to copper deficiency. Nature, 281: 542-543.
  9. Greaves, J.E., C.T. Hirst, 1929. The mineral content of grain. The Journal of Nutrition, 1(4): 293-298
  10. Herzog, H., P. Stamp, 1983. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation in grains at different ear positions in gigas semidwarf and normal spring wheats. Euphytica, 32: 511- 520. Jodral-Segado, A.M., M. Navarro-Alarcon, H.L.G. De La Serrana, M.C. Lopez-Martinez, 2003. Magnesium and calcium contents in foods from SE Spain: Influencing factors and estimation of daily dietary intakes. Science of The Total Environment, 312(1-3): 47-58.
  11. Kara, R., Z. Dumlupinar, Y. Hisir, T. Dokuyucu, A. Akkaya, 2007. Evaluation of oat varieties for the yield components and grain yield under the Kahramanmaras conditions. Proceedings of VII. Field Crops Congress (in Turkish with English abstract), 121-125, 25-27 June 2007,
  12. Erzurum, Turkey. Martens, D.C., W.L. Lindsay, 1990.
  13. Testing Soils for Copper, Iron, Manganese an Zinc. In: Soil Testing and Plant Analysis 3rd Ed. R.L. Westerman (ed). SSSA Book Series 3, Madison, WI, pp. 229-260.
  14. Nyborg, M. 1970. Sensitivity to manganese deficiency of different cultivars of wheat, oats and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci., 50: 198-200.
  15. Ozcan, M.M., G. Ozkan, A. Topal, 2006. Characteristics of grains and oils of four differen