SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Impact of genotype and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield and nitrogen use by oat (Avena sativa L.) in Turkey

Ziya DUMLUPINAR
Aydin AKKAYA
Hasan MARAL
Tevrican DOKUYUCU
Pages
177–184
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, differences between the years were significantly important for all investigated traits except soil nitrogen content at planting (NCP), nitrogen content at maturity (NCM) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NAG).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Efficient nitrogen (N) use is one of the most crucial issues for crop management in developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since Turkish agricultural practices tends to use lower inputs of N fertilizers, a field trial was carried out in 2007-08 and 2008-09 cropping years to determine response of six oat genotypes (Seydisehir, Apak, Yesilkoy-330, Amasya, Checota and Yesilkoy-1779) to three N rates (0, 100 and 200 kg ha-1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, differences between the years were significantly important for all investigated traits except soil nitrogen content at planting (NCP), nitrogen content at maturity (NCM) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NAG).
🔬Design:Experimental Field Trial
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Efficient nitrogen (N) use is one of the most crucial issues for crop management in developing countries. Since Turkish agricultural practices tends to use lower inputs of N fertilizers, a field trial was carried out in 2007-08 and 2008-09 cropping years to determine response of six oat genotypes (Seydisehir, Apak, Yesilkoy-330, Amasya, Checota and Yesilkoy-1779) to three N rates (0, 100 and 200 kg ha-1). According to the results, differences between the years were significantly important for all investigated traits except soil nitrogen content at planting (NCP), nitrogen content at maturity (NCM) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NAG). Genotypes significantly varied for all traits except NCP, nitrogen in grain (NG) and NAG. However, differences among N rates were significant for all traits except NCP.Among the genotypes Checota had the highest nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and grain yield (GY) (20.6 kg kg-1 N and 2590 kg ha-1, respectively).

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMLUPINAR, Z., AKKAYA, A., MARAL, H., DOKUYUCU, T. (2022). Impact of genotype and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield and nitrogen use by oat (Avena sativa L.) in Turkey. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 177–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/605868

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Achleitner, A., N.A. Tinker, E. Zechner, H. Buerstmayr, 2008. Genetic diversity among oat varieties of worldwide origin and associations of AFLP markers with quantitative. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117: 1041-1053.
  2. Bohlool, B.B., J.K. Ladha, D.P. Garrity, T. George, 1992. Biological nitrogen fixation for sustainable agriculture. A perspective. Plant Soil. 14: 1-11.
  3. Barbottin, A., C. Lecomte, C. Bouchard, M.H. Jeuffroy, 2005. Nitrogen remobilization during grain filling in wheat: genotypic and environmental effects. Crop Sci. 45: 1141- 1150. Bulman, P., D.L. Smith, 1994. Post-heading uptake, retranslocation, and partitioning in spring barley. Crop Sci. 34: 977-984.
  4. Calderini, D.F., S. Torres-Leon, G.A. Slafer, 1995. Consequences of wheat breeding on nitrogen and phosphorus yield, grain nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and associated traits. Ann. Bot.76: 315-322.
  5. Carreck, N.L., D.G. Christian, 1991. Studies on the pattern of nitrogen uptake and translocation to grain of winter barley intended for malting. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119: 549-559.
  6. Cassman, K.G., A. Dobermann, D.T. Walters, H. Yang, 2003. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28: 315-358.
  7. Clarke, J.M., C.A. Campbell, H.W. Cutforth, R.M. De Pauw, G.E. Winkleman, 1990. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, translocation, and utilization efficiency of wheat in relation to environmental and cultivar yield and protein levels. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70: 965-977.
  8. Cox, M.C., C.Q. Qualset, D.W. Rains, 1985. Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. II. Nitrogen assimilation in relation to grain yield and protein. Crop Sci. 25: 435-440.
  9. Dawson, J.C., D.R. Huggins, S.S. Jones, 2008. Characterizing nitrogen use efficiency in natural and agricultural ecosystems to improve the performance of cereal crops in low-input and organic agricultural systems. Field Crops Res. 107: 89-101.
  10. Delogu, G., L. Cattivelli, N. Pecchioni, D. DeFalcis, T. Maggiore, A.M. Stanca, 1998. Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogen in winter barley and winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 9: 11-20.
  11. Isfan, D., 1993. Genotypic variability for physiological efficiency index of nitrogen in oats. Plant Soil. 154: 53-59.
  12. Kelly, J.T., R.K. Bacon, B.R. Wells, 1995. Genetic variability in nitrogen utilization at four growth stages in soft red winter wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 18: 969-982.
  13. McMullan, P.M., P.B.E McVetty, A.A. Urquhart, 1988. Dry matter and nitrogen a