SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2012 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Some agricultural and quality properties of Ulubag ecotype lines of wild orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.)

Metin TOSUN
Kamil HALILOGLU
Esin SAHIN
Pages
191–197
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that lines 3, 9, 14, and 18 in Ulubag ecotype can be used for new variety development, in terms of hay yield and quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Research was conducted in Erzurum ecologic conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eight lines of Ulubag ecotype that were selected in the previous selection process and 1 control cultivar were used in this research.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that lines 3, 9, 14, and 18 in Ulubag ecotype can be used for new variety development, in terms of hay yield and quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Research was conducted in Erzurum ecologic conditions. Eight lines of Ulubag ecotype that were selected in the previous selection process and 1 control cultivar were used in this research. Lines used in the research were compared to each other and the control variety. Fresh hay yield, dried hay yield, crude protein content and yield, plant nutritional elements, ADF and NDF rates, and seed yield traits were investigated in this research. In Ulubag ecotypes, 6 lines in fresh hay yield and dried hay yield, 1 line in crude protein content, 4 lines in crude protein yield, 1 line in P content, 1 line in Mg content, 7 lines in K content, 1 line in Ca content and 4 lines in seed yield gave better result than control. On the other hand, ADF rates in 4 lines were lower than control variety. However, NDF rates in all lines were better than the control variety. It is concluded that lines 3, 9, 14, and 18 in Ulubag ecotype can be used for new variety development, in terms of hay yield and quality.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOSUN, M., HALILOGLU, K., SAHIN, E. (2022). Some agricultural and quality properties of Ulubag ecotype lines of wild orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 191–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/605863

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acıkgoz, E., 1995. Forage Book. Department of Field Crops. Faculty of Agriculture. Uludag University. Bursa. Andic, C., 1985. Plant species in rangelands and uplands of Erzurum region and their life forms and flowering periods. Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University. 16: 95-104.
  2. Aydin, I., Z. Acar, F. Tosun, 1994. Adaptation studies of some perennial grass forage crops in Samsun conditions. Field Crop Symposium, 25-29
  3. April, İzmir, pp. 61-64. Anonymus, 1995. Acid detergent and neutral detergent fiber using ANKOM’s fiber analyzer F200. Ankom Technology Corporation, Fairport, NY. Ball, D.M., M. Collins, G.D. Lacefield, N.P. Martin, D.A. Mertens, K.E. Olson, D.H. Putnam, D.J. Undersander, M.W. Wolf, 2001. Understanding forage quality. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01,
  4. Park Ridge, IL. Berg, C.C., R.R. Hill, 1989. Maturity effect on yield and quality of spring harvested orchardgrass forage. Crop Science, 29: 944-948.
  5. Cherney, J.H., D.J.R. Cherney, 2005. Agronomic response of cool-season grasses to low-intensity harvest management and low potassium fertility. Agronomy Journal, 97:1216- 1221. Colburn, M.W., J.L. Evans, 1967. Chemical composition of the cell-wall constituent and acid detergent fiber fractions of forages. Journal of Dairy Science Vol.50, No.7. pp.1130- 1135. Convertini, G., D. Ferri, M. Maiorana, 1999. Quality and mineral composition of forages in Mediterranean environment, CIHEAM- Options Mediterraneennes, pp. 51-54.
  6. Copponet, M., 1964. Changes in the mineral composition of pasture grasses under a grazing regime. Comptes Rendus Seances Academic Agriculture (France), 50:330-342.
  7. Davies, I., 1976. Developmental characteristics of grass varieties in relation to their herbage production. I. Analysis of highdigesbility varieties of Dactylis glomerata at three stages of development. Journal Agriculture Science, 87:25-32.
  8. Edward, B., Ph. D. Rayburn, 1998. Using a forage test to identify improvements in forage management. West Virginia University Extension Service, PO Box 6108, Morgantown. Fisher, D.S., J.C. Burns, J.E. Moore, 1995. The nutritive evaluation of forage. In forages. Vol. II: The science of Grassland Agriculture ( Ed.: R.F. Barnes, D.A. Miller and C.J. Nelson), Iowa State Univ. Press, Inc., 105-115.
  9. Gordon, C.H., A.M. Decker, H.G. Wiseman, 1962. Some effect of nitrogen fertilizer, maturity and light on the composition of orchardgrass. Agronomy Journal, 54: 376-378.
  10. Gokkus, A., Y. Serin, A. Koc, 1994. Effect of N