Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2013 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

GENOTYPE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS AND STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR DRY-MATTER YIELD AND SEED YIELD IN HUNGARIAN VETCH (Vicia pannonica CRANTZ.)

Pages
238–246
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Stability analysis indicated that although the most stable genotype was the Ege Beyazi-79 cultivar in terms of dry-matter yield, the Oguz-2002 cultivar was the most stable in terms of seed yield

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to determine genotype–environment interactions and the stability status of twelve Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) genotypes in terms of dry-matter yield and seed yield under the ecological conditions of the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiments were performed in five locations in the region during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 growing seasons.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Stability analysis indicated that although the most stable genotype was the Ege Beyazi-79 cultivar in terms of dry-matter yield, the Oguz-2002 cultivar was the most stable in terms of seed yield
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine genotype–environment interactions and the stability status of twelve Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) genotypes in terms of dry-matter yield and seed yield under the ecological conditions of the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. The experiments were performed in five locations in the region during the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 growing seasons. The experiments were performed according to a complete randomized block design with three replications. Genotype–environment interactions were found to be highly significant (P < 0.01) for dry-matter yield and seed yield, indicating that the Hungarian vetch genotypes’ dry-matter yield and seed yield were significantly affected by the year and condition of the location. The stability of the genotypes was estimated using the mean yield of genotypes (xi), regression coefficient (bi), regression deviation mean square (S2di), determination coefficient (R2), and regression line intercept (a). Stability analysis indicated that although the most stable genotype was the Ege Beyazi-79 cultivar in terms of dry-matter yield, the Oguz-2002 cultivar was the most stable in terms of seed yield

🔖

Cite This Article

BASBAG, M., SAYAR, M. S., ANLARSAL, A. E. (2022). GENOTYPE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS AND STABILITY ANALYSIS FOR DRY-MATTER YIELD AND SEED YIELD IN HUNGARIAN VETCH (Vicia pannonica CRANTZ.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 238–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/605841

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abd El-Moneim, AM., P.S. Cocks. 1993. Adaptation and yield stability of selected lines of Lathyrus spp. under rainfed conditions in West Asia. Euphytica 66: 89-97.
  2. Acikgoz, E. 1988. Annual forage legumes in the arid and semiarid regions of Turkey. In: D. B. Beck, and L. A. Materori (eds), Nitrogen fixation by legumes in Mediterranean agriculture, ICARDA, Aleppo, pp. 47-54.
  3. Acikgoz, E, A. Ustun, İ. Gul, A.E. Anlarsal, A.S. Tekeli, İ. Nizam, R. Avcioglu, H. Geren S. Cakmakcı, B. Aydinoglu, et al. 2009. Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Span J Agric Res. 7(1): 96-106.
  4. Akcura, M., Y. Kaya, S. Taner. 2005. Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat in Central Anatolian Region. Turk J Agric For. 29: 369-375.
  5. Albayrak, S., O. Tongel, M. Guler. 2005. stability analysis and determination of seed yield and yield componets of candidate vetch (Vicia sativa L.) varieties in Middle Black Sea Region. The Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Ondokuz Mayıs University. 20 (1):50-55.
  6. Becker, H.C., J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding. 101: 1-23.
  7. Bozoglu, H., A. Gulumser. 2000. Determination of genotype x environment interactions of some agronomic characters in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Turk J Agric For. 24: 211- 220. Comstock, R.E., R. Moll. 1963. Genotype × environment interactions in Hanson, W.D. and Robinson, H.F. (eds). Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NASNRC Pub., Washington, DC, pp. 164-196.
  8. Eberhart, S.A., W.A. Russell. 1966 Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6: 36-40.
  9. Ezzat, E.M., M.A. Ali, A.M. Mahmoud. 2010. Agronomic performance, genotype x environment interactions and stability analysis of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Asian J Crop Sci. 2 (4): 250-260.
  10. Finlay, K.W., G.N. Wilkinson. 1963 The analysis of adaptation in plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res. 14: 742- 754. Freed, R., S.P. Einensmith, S. Guetz, D Reicosky, V.W. Smail, P. Wolberg. 1989. User’s Guide to MSTAT-C analysis of agronomic research experiments, Michigan State Uni. USA. Hebert, Y., C. Plomion, N. Harzic. 1995. Genotypic × environment interaction for root traits in maize as analysed with factorial regression models. Euphytica. 81: 85-92.
  11. Kılıc, H., T. Yagbasanlar. 2010. Genotype x environment interaction and phenotypic stability analysis for grain yield and several quality tra