Grass contribution to the hay yield in the Picloram+2.4-D application was statistically significant (P
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was conducted to determine the effect of control methods on the weed composition of a pasture located at high altitude zone of the Cukurova Region, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mowing, fertilization, applications of 2.4-D, Picloram+2.4-D, Paraquat and Glyphosate were studied as weed control methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Grass contribution to the hay yield in the Picloram+2.4-D application was statistically significant (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This research was conducted to determine the effect of control methods on the weed composition of a pasture located at high altitude zone of the Cukurova Region, Turkey. The experiment was designed as randomized complete block with three replicates for three years. The mowing, fertilization, applications of 2.4-D, Picloram+2.4-D, Paraquat and Glyphosate were studied as weed control methods. The highest dry matter yield was obtained from the Picloram+2.4-D treatments. Dry matter yields in all treatments were greater as compared to the control. Grass contribution to the hay yield in the Picloram+2.4-D application was statistically significant (P
🔖
Cite This Article
AVCI, M., AYDEMIR, S. K., CINAR¹, S. (2022). EFFECT OF WEED CONTROL METHODS ON HAY YIELD, BOTANICAL COMPOSITION AND FORAGE QUALITY OF A MOUNTAIN PASTURE. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 139–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/605833
Altin, M. 1992. Meadow-Range İmprovement. Trakya University Tekirdag Agriculture Faculty Press No: 152, Tekirdag Altin, M. A. Gokkus, A. Koc, 2005.
Range Development, TUGEM, 468 p. Ankara. Anonymous, 2007.
Chemical Analysis Results, University of Cukurova Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Adana, Turkey. Anonymous, 2012. Meteorological data for Adana, http://www.wunderground.com/q/zmw:00000.1.17350
Bovey, R.W. R.E. Meyer, L. Morton, 1972. Herbage Production Following Brush Control With Herbicides in Texas. Journal of Range Management, 22(5): 315-317
Buyukburc, U. 1991. A research on improvement of natural pasture in Karayav_an village of Polatlı town with different fertilizer types and levels. Cumhuriyet University, Agricultural Faculty of Tokat 8: 38. Caddel, J. E. Allen, 2012. Forage quality interpretations, http://virtual.chapingo.mx/dona/paginaCBasicos/f-2117.pdf
Cinar, S. M. Avci, R. Hatipoglu, K. Kokten, I. Atis, T. Tukel, S.K. Aydemir, H. Yucel, 2005. Hanyeri village (TufanbeyliAdana) slope ceremonial part of the botanical composition of manure nitrogen and phosphorus, a study on the effects of forage yield and quality of grass, Turkey 6 Field Crops Congress, 5-9 September 2005,
Antalya, Turkey, Volume II, p: 873-877.
Conrad, H.R. and F.A. Martz, 1985. Forages for dairy cattle, p: 550-559. In M.E. Heath et al., (ed) Forages: the science of grassland agriculture, 4 th ed. Iowa State University. Darrell, L. W. Leon, 2005. Weed Control in Pasture&Range. College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences.Cooperative Extension Service. South Dakota State University. Duzgunes, O. T. Kesici, O. Kavuncu, F. Gurbuz, 1987.
Research and experimental methods, Ankara Univ. Agr. Fac. Publications, No: 295, Ankara,
Turkey. Ferrell, J.A. G.E. Macdonald, B.J. Brecke, J.J. Mullahey, T. Ducar, 2004. Weed Management in Pastures and Rangeland.SS-AGR-08 Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.Website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wg006
Genckan, M.S. R. Avcioglu, H. Soya, O. Dogan, 1990. Problems and solutions of use, maintain and improvement of rangelands in Turkey. Turkey Agriculture Engineer III.Technical Congress 8-12 January 1990, pp. 53-61.
Ankara Grekul, C. W. Cole, D.E. Bork, 2005. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and Pasture Forage Responses to Wiping with Various Herbicides. Weed Technology 19(2) Lawrence. Weed Science Society of America, p: 298-306.