Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2014 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Adaptability of newly improved creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera l.) genotypes in a mediterranean environment

Pages
19–24
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated significant variations amongthe genotypes in terms of the evaluated characteristics and the average adaptability of some genotypes ofwhich some traits such as cover and turf quality were in an acceptable range.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.), with a mild shade tolerance, is a stoloniferous cool season turfgrass adaptable to temperate climatic conditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Faculty, Izmir, Turkey during the years of 2007 and 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated significant variations amongthe genotypes in terms of the evaluated characteristics and the average adaptability of some genotypes ofwhich some traits such as cover and turf quality were in an acceptable range.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.), with a mild shade tolerance, is a stoloniferous cool season turfgrass adaptable to temperate climatic conditions. Recently new genotypes were improved by breeders in theUSA, having respectively higher heat and drought tolerance. In an attempt to evaluate the ad aptability of thistype of bentgrass genotype s, an experiment were established on the experimental farm located at Bornova, EgeUniv. Agric. Faculty, Izmir, Turkey during the years of 2007 and 2009. Six genotypes of bentgrass andtraditional cultivarKromi as control were tested for two years and t urf grass color, cover, weed infestationand turf quality were assessed by a visual scoring (1 -9 points). Results indicated significant variations amongthe genotypes in terms of the evaluated characteristics and the average adaptability of some genotypes ofwhich some traits such as cover and turf quality were in an acceptable range. It was also suggested thatdistinguished genotypes such as genotype M65 -6 -OVN-28, M71 -6 -26 -294 and M39 -6 -20 should be testedfurthermore and for other agronomical characteristics .

🔖

Cite This Article

GEREN, H., KIR, B., KAVUT, Y. T., AVCIOGLU, R., DEMIROGLU, G. (2022). Adaptability of newly improved creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera l.) genotypes in a mediterranean environment. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 19–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/605810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Anonymous. 2001. Technical Instruction for Agronomical Evaluation Experiments. Turf grass, Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs, TTSM, Ankara -Turkey (in Turkısh). Anon ymous. 2009. Turf Adaptations and Tolerances. The UC Guide to Healtly Lawns, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, http://ipm.ucdavis.edu/TOOLS/TURF/TURFSPECIES/creep bent.html (Accessed December 10, 2013).
  2. Acikgoz, E. 1994.
  3. Turf Areas, Techniques of Establishment and Maintenance. Environmental landscape, Publish, Bursa (in Turkısh). Acikg oz, N., E. Ilker and A. Gokcol. 2004. Assessment of Biological Research on the Computer. EU TOTEM, İzmir (in Turkısh). Avciog lu, R. 1997. Turf Technique (Turf Establishment & Management). Ege University Press,
  4. Izmir, Turkey (in Turkısh). Beard, J.B. 1973. Turf Grass: Science and Culture. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA. Demiroğlu, G., B. Kir, R. Avcioglu a nd H. Geren. 2010. An Investigation on the Yield and Quality Performances of Some Rotation Pasture Mixtures under Different Harvest Treatments. African J. Biotechnol., 9: 7877 –7884. Demiroglu, G., R. Avcioglu, B. Kır and A. Salman. 2011. Investigations on Texture Weed Invasion and Density Features of Some Cool Season Turf Grass Cultivars in Mediterranean Environment. International Journal of Agric ulture & Biology, 13: 461 –468. Gaussoin, R. and A. Martin. 1994. Turf grass Weed Prevention and Management. http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/Weeds/g1045.htm (Accessed November 20, 2013).
  5. Harivandi, M.A., W. Davis, V.A. Gibeault, M. Henry, J.V. Dam and L. Wu. 1984. Selecting The Best Turfgrass. California Turfgrass Culture, 34: 17 -24. Ceylan, A. 1994. Principles of Agronomy. Ege Uni. Faculty of Agri. Publ. 491 (in Turkısh). Kır, B., G. Demiroglu, R. Avcioglu and H. Geren. 2010. Effect of Sowing Techniques and Harvesting Treatments on the Performances of Some Rotation Pasture Mixtures. African J. Biotechnol., 9: 6666 –6669. Martinello, P. and E. D’Andrea. 2006. Co ol-season Turf grass Species Adaptability in Mediterranean Environments and Quality Traits of Varieties. European J. Agron., 25: 234 – 242. Morris, K.N. and R.C. Sherman. 2000. The National Turfgrass Evaluation Program: Assessing New and Improved Varieties. Diversity, 16: 19 –22. Martinello, P. 2005. Variability of Turf Quality and Phytocoenoses in Areas of Play in Football Grounds in Mediterranean Environments. Agric. Med., 135: 209 –220. Oral, N. and E. Acikgoz. 1998. The Investigations on the Seed Mi