Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2014 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Dimension, geometric, agricultural and quality characteristics of safflower seeds

Pages
7–12
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Protein content was found as significantly and negative correlated with some characters,similar to the seed widness (r = -0.2546**), seed thickness (r=-0.1918*), geometric diameter (r=-0.3194**), seedsurface area (r=-0.3119**), pappus ratio (r=-0.3114**) and 100 -seed weight (r=-0.2597), respectively.According to the results, increasing the dimension and geometrical values cause to a decrease in the oil andprotein content of safflower seeds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was carried out in the research field of Agricultural Faculty , Selcuk University , Konya, Turkey .Field experiments were carried out in two growing seasons (2011 and 2012) according to RandomizedComplete Block Design with three replications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, a total of 13 promised safflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) lines (A13, A29, C12, E12, F4, F5, F6, G16, H3, J19, Y1 -8 -14 -1 , AOL-2(2), DP 1.5.8 -1) and 5cultivars (Black Sun1, KS 06 and Oleic Leed, Dinçer, Remzibey) were used as material.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Protein content was found as significantly and negative correlated with some characters,similar to the seed widness (r = -0.2546**), seed thickness (r=-0.1918*), geometric diameter (r=-0.3194**), seedsurface area (r=-0.3119**), pappus ratio (r=-0.3114**) and 100 -seed weight (r=-0.2597), respectively.According to the results, increasing the dimension and geometrical values cause to a decrease in the oil andprotein content of safflower seeds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research was carried out in the research field of Agricultural Faculty , Selcuk University , Konya, Turkey .Field experiments were carried out in two growing seasons (2011 and 2012) according to RandomizedComplete Block Design with three replications. In the study, a total of 13 promised safflower (Carthamustinctorius L.) lines (A13, A29, C12, E12, F4, F5, F6, G16, H3, J19, Y1 -8 -14 -1 , AOL-2(2), DP 1.5.8 -1) and 5cultivars (Black Sun1, KS 06 and Oleic Leed, Dinçer, Remzibey) were used as material. Oil content of thesafflower genotypes were rang ed in between 24.05 -33.18 %. The highest protein content value wa s obtainedfrom J19 line (21.72 %) while the lowest was found on the Turkish cultivar of Remzibey (16.03 %). Negativecorrelations were found for oil content and hull thickness (r=-0.3152**), hull ratio (r=-0.7122**) and pappusratio (r=-0.3408**). Protein content was found as significantly and negative correlated with some characters,similar to the seed widness (r = -0.2546**), seed thickness (r=-0.1918*), geometric diameter (r=-0.3194**), seedsurface area (r=-0.3119**), pappus ratio (r=-0.3114**) and 100 -seed weight (r=-0.2597), respectively.According to the results, increasing the dimension and geometrical values cause to a decrease in the oil andprotein content of safflower seeds. Quality components (oil and protein content) showed negative correlationswith both of pappus rate and hull features.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADA, R. (2022). Dimension, geometric, agricultural and quality characteristics of safflower seeds. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 7–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/605804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Ada, R., 2012. Effects of winter and spring sowing on yield components of safflower Genotypes. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 66: 622 -626. Aktas, T., I. Celen and R. Durgut, 2006. Some physical and mechanical properties of safflower seed ( Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Agronomy, 5(4): 613 -616. A rslan, B., E. Esendal and C. Pas a, 2008. The economically important traits of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars and lines cultivated in Tekirdag, Turkey. Proceedings of the 7th International Safflower C onference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia. Bau mler, E., A. Cuniberti, S. M. Nolasco and I. C. Riccobene, 2006. Moisture dependent physical and compression properties of safflower seed. Journal of Food Engineering, 72: 134 -140. Calisir, S., M. Ozcan, H. Haciseferogullari and M. U. Yildiz, 2005. A study on some physico -chemical properties of Turkey okra (Hibiscus esculenta L.) seeds. Journal of Food Engineering, 68: 73 –78. De Silva, H. N. and I. L. Gordan, 1986. Variance component in safflower (Carth amus tinctorius ) trials in the Manawatu district, with the implication for testing methods. New Zealand Journal of Experimentel Agriculture, 14: 1 -6. Dajue, L. and H. H. Mu ndel, 1996. Safflower. Carthamus tinctorius L. Promoting the conservation and use of u nderutilized and neglected crops. 7. Institute of Plant Genetic and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben / International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome. Italy, 83 pp. Dog an, A. and M. Serinc,, 1990. Studies on the oil quality of some selected safflowe r (Carthamus tinctorius L.) lines. Gida, 15(1): 51 -56 (in Turkish). Goss, H. and K. K. Otagaki, 1954. Safflower meal digestion tests, lambs used in digestion trials with decorticated seed meal to test product as feed for livestock. California Agriculture, page 15. JUMP, 1989 -2002. 5.0.1a: A Business Unit of SAS Copyright, SAS Institute Inc. http://www.jmp.com
  2. Kaya, M., S. Bayramin, G. Kaya and O, Uzun, 2011. S eed vigor and ion toxicity in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seedlings produced by various dimension s under NaCl stres s. Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade, 63 (3 ), 723 -729. Keles, R., 2010. Effects of different sowing dates on the yield, yield components and quality on some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. Selcuk University, Master Thesis. Keles, R. and O. O ztu rk, 2012. Effect of different sowing dates on the seed yield and quality of safflower. TABAD, 5 (1): 112 -117.