Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2015 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

HAY YIELD, QUALITY TRAITS AND INTERSPECIES COMPETITION OF FORAGE PEA - TRITICALE MIXTURES HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT STAGES

Pages
166–173
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, leafed forage pea was found to be more aggressive than semi-leafless cv. in all mixtures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted in two years under ecological conditions of Ordu Province to investigate the effects of different mixture ratios and harvest stages on hay yield, some quality traits and interspecies competition of forage pea-triticale mixtures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Leafed (Ü) and semi-leafless (U) forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars and triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) were sown as monocrops and in different forage pea:triticale mixture ratios (75:25, 50:50, 25:75) and harvested at booting and milk-dough stage of triticale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, leafed forage pea was found to be more aggressive than semi-leafless cv. in all mixtures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study was conducted in two years under ecological conditions of Ordu Province to investigate the effects of different mixture ratios and harvest stages on hay yield, some quality traits and interspecies competition of forage pea-triticale mixtures. Leafed (Ü) and semi-leafless (U) forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars and triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) were sown as monocrops and in different forage pea:triticale mixture ratios (75:25, 50:50, 25:75) and harvested at booting and milk-dough stage of triticale. Considering the total digestible dry matter and crude protein yields of the treatments together, it was observed that T75:Ü25, T50:Ü50, T75:U25 mixtures harvested at milk-dough stage of triticale produced high yields. In addition, leafed forage pea was found to be more aggressive than semi-leafless cv. in all mixtures.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASCI, O. O., ARICI, Y. K., ACAR, Z. (2022). HAY YIELD, QUALITY TRAITS AND INTERSPECIES COMPETITION OF FORAGE PEA - TRITICALE MIXTURES HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT STAGES. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 166–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/605783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acikgoz, E. 2001.
  2. Forages. VİPAS A.S. Press.
  3. Acikgoz, E., A. Ustun, I. GuI, E. Anlarsal, A.S. Tekeli, I. Nizam, R. Avcioglu, H. Geren, S. Cakmakci, B. Aydinoglu, C. Yucel, M. Avci, Z. Acar, I. Ayan, A. Uzun, U. Bilgili, M. Sincik and M. Yavuz. 2009. Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Span J. Agric Res. 7(1):96-106.
  4. Agegnehu, G., A. Ghizaw and W. Sinebo. 2006. Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. Eur J. Agron. 25:202-207. Anonymous, 2015. Deciphering hay quality, http://www.ker.com/library/ equinews/v9n210.pdf, (Accessed May 26, 2015)
  5. Asik, F.F. 2006. The effect of mixture rates and cutting stages on hay yield and quality characters of of pea (Pisum sativum L.) + barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mixture. Uludag University Institute of Science, Master's Thesis. Assefa, G. and I. Ledin. 2001. Effect of variety, soil type and fertiliser on the establishment, growth, forage yield, quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 92:95- 111. Berkenkamp, B. and J. Meeres. 1987. Mixtures of annual crops for forage in central Alberta. Can J. Plant Sci. 67:175-183.
  6. Bilgili, U., A. Uzun, M. Sincik, M. Yavuz, B. Aydinoglu, S. Cakmakci, H. Geren, R. Avcioglu, I. Nizam, S. Tekeli, I. Gul, E. Anlarsal, C. Yucel, M. Avci, Z. Acar, I. Ayan, A. Ustun and E. Acikgoz. 2010. Forage yield and lodging traits in peas (Pisum sativum L.) with different leaf types. Turk J. Field Crops. 15(1):50-53.
  7. Budakli Carpici, E. and N. Celik. 2014. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with triticale and annual ryegrass. Turk J. Field Crops. 19(1): 66-69.
  8. Dhima, K.V., A.S. Lithourgidis, I.B. Vasilakoglou and C.A. Dordas. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crop Res. 100:249-256.
  9. Dordas, C.A., D.N. Vlachostergios and A.S. Lithourgidis. 2012. Growth Dynamics and agronomic-economic benefits of pea- oat and pea-barley intercrops. Crop and Pasture Sci. 63:45- 52. Duzgunes, O., T. Kesici, O. Kavuncu and F. Gurbuz. 1987. Research and Experimental Methods (Statistical MethodsII). University of Ankara,
  10. Faculty of Agriculture Press.
  11. Erol, A., M. Kaplan and M. Kizilsimsek. 2009. Oats (Avena sativa)- common vetch (Vicia sativa) mixtures grown on a low-input basis for a sustainable agriculture. Tropical Grasslands. 43: 191-1