Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

LAND USE AND LAND COVER CHANGES USING SPOT 5 PANSHARPEN IMAGES; A CASE STUDY IN AKDENIZ DISTRICT, MERSIN-TURKEY

Pages
32–38
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An accuracy assessment wasconducted using overall accuracy and Kappa statistics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of the study is to quantify main changes in urban area of Akdeniz district of Mersin province usingPan sharpen SPOT 5 MS (with 3 bands) satellite images.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, land cover and land use maps of 2006 and, 2014are produced using Maximum Likelihood supervised classification technique to detect the growth of urban area in theselected area.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An accuracy assessment wasconducted using overall accuracy and Kappa statistics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main objective of the study is to quantify main changes in urban area of Akdeniz district of Mersin province usingPan sharpen SPOT 5 MS (with 3 bands) satellite images. In this study, land cover and land use maps of 2006 and, 2014are produced using Maximum Likelihood supervised classification technique to detect the growth of urban area in theselected area. Preprocessing methods, including geometric and radiometric correction were performed. From to changesmethod was applied to determine the land cover/land use transformation in the region. An accuracy assessment wasconducted using overall accuracy and Kappa statistics. Results show that maps obtained from images for 2006, and 2014had an overall accuracy of 82.96%, and 84.00%, and a Kappa coefficient of 0.80, and 0.82, respectively. The resultsshowed that between the selected years the district faced a huge transformation from agricultural fields and bare lands toartificial surfaces. Change detection between 2006 and 2014 shows that most of the agricultural fields (6295,1 ha) havebeen increased; moreover, artificial surfaces and green houses have also increased. The largest decrease has occurred forbare lands area of which approximately 3942,5 ha. According to the results, artificial surfaces was increased by 189 hafrom 2006 to 2014 in Akdeniz District of Mersin.

🔖

Cite This Article

Balçık, F. B., Göksel, Ç. (2022). LAND USE AND LAND COVER CHANGES USING SPOT 5 PANSHARPEN IMAGES; A CASE STUDY IN AKDENIZ DISTRICT, MERSIN-TURKEY. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 32–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/605530

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alphan, H. (2013). Bi-temporal analysis of landscape changes in the easternmost Mediterranean deltas using binary and clas- sified change information. Environmental Management, 51, 541–554.
  2. Alphan, H., & Celik, N. (2016). Monitoring changes in landscape pattern. Use of Ikonos and Quickbird images. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(81). Alphan, H. and Sonmez, F. (2015). Mapping availability of sea view for potential building development areas. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(7). Aspinall, R. J., & Hill, M. J. (2008). Land use change: science, policy, and management: CRC Press.
  3. Banister, D., Watson, S., & Wood, C. (1997). Sustainable Cities: Transport, Energy, and Urban Form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(1), 125-143, doi:10.1068/b240125. Bektas, F., & Goksel, C. (2005). Remote sensing and GIS integration for land-cover analysis: a case study:Bozcaada Island.Water Science and Technology, 51(11), 239–244.
  4. Bektaş Balçık, F (2010). Mapping And Monitoring Wetland Environment By Analysis of Different Satellite İmages And Field Spectroscopy’, PhD Thesis, Istanbul Technical University Bektas Balcik F., Karakacan Kuzucu A. (2016) “Determination of Land Cover/Land Use Using SPOT 7 Data With Supervised Classification Methods”. GeoAdvances Workshop, 2016.
  5. Istanbul. Bozkaya, A. G., Bektas Balcik, F., Goksel, C., Dogru, A. O.,Ulugtekin, N. N., & Sozen, S. (2014). Satellitebased multitemporal change detection in Igneada flooded forests. Romanian Journal of Geography, 58(2), 161–168.
  6. Bozkaya, A. G., Bektas Balcik, F., Goksel, C., Esbah, H. (2015) Forecasting land-cover growth using remotely sensed data: a case study of the Igneada protection area in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring Assess, 187: 59 Burak, S., Doğan, E. and Gazioğlu, C. (2004). Impact of urbanization and tourism on coastal environment. Ocean and Coastal Management, 47(9–10): 515–527.
  7. Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  8. Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35-46.
  9. Sertel, E., Akay, S.S. (2015). High resolution mapping of urban areas using SPOT-5 images and ancillary data" International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO)., 2 (2), 63-76
  10. Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., Lambin, E. (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: