Journals / Turkish Journal of Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF CYBERBULLYING IN FORMSPRING.ME, MYSPACE AND YOUTUBE SOCIAL NETWORKS

Pages
168–178
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The experimental results of the study proved that SGD and MLP classifiers with 500 selected features using SVM-RFE algorithm showed the best results (F_measure value is more than0.930) by means of classification time and accuracy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cyberbullying has become a major problem along with the increase of communication technologies and social media become part of daily life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Chi2, support vector machine-recursivefeatureelimination(SVM-RFE),minimumredundancymaximumrelevanceandReliefF)for cyberbullying detection have also been investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The experimental results of the study proved that SGD and MLP classifiers with 500 selected features using SVM-RFE algorithm showed the best results (F_measure value is more than0.930) by means of classification time and accuracy.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cyberbullying has become a major problem along with the increase of communication technologies and social media become part of daily life. Cyberbullying is the use of communication tools to harass or harm a person or group. Especially for the adolescent age group, cyberbullying causes damage that is thought to be suicidal and poses a great risk. In this study, a model is developed to identify the cyberbullying actions that took place in social networks. The model investigates the effects of some text miningmethods such as pre-processing, feature extraction, feature selection and classification on automatic detection of cyberbullying using datasets obtained from Formspring.me, Myspace and YouTube social network platforms. Different classifiers (i.e. multilayer perceptron (MLP), stochastic gradient descent (SGD), logistic regression and radial basis function) have been developed and the effects of feature selection algorithms (i.e. Chi2, support vector machine-recursivefeatureelimination(SVM-RFE),minimumredundancymaximumrelevanceandReliefF)for cyberbullying detection have also been investigated. The experimental results of the study proved that SGD and MLP classifiers with 500 selected features using SVM-RFE algorithm showed the best results (F_measure value is more than0.930) by means of classification time and accuracy.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çürük, E., Acı, Ç. İ., Eşsiz, E. S. (2022). AUTOMATIC DETECTION OF CYBERBULLYING IN FORMSPRING.ME, MYSPACE AND YOUTUBE SOCIAL NETWORKS. Turkish Journal of Engineering, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 168–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/605528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Al-garadi, M.A., Varathan, K.D. and Ravana, S.D. (2016). “Cybercrime detection in online communications: The experimental case of cyberbullying detection in the Twitter network” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 63, pp. 433–443.
  2. Andreou, E. (2004). “Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children” British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 297–309.
  3. Bing Liu (2011). Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data, 2nd Ed., Springer Publishing Company, Chicago, USA. Chakrabarti, S. (2003). Mining the Web: discovering knowledge from hypertext data, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, USA. Dadvar, M. and Jong, F.M.G. de (2012). "Improved cyberbullying detection through personal profiles." International Conference on Cyberbullying, Paris, France. Dadvar, M., Jong, F.M.G. de, Ordelman, R.J.F. and Trieschnigg, R.B. (2012). “Improved cyberbullying detection using gender information” 12th Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop, Ghent, Belgium, pp 1- 6. Dadvar, M., Trieschnigg, R.B. and Jong, F.M.G. de (2013). “Expert knowledge for automatic detection of bullies in social networks.” 25th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Delft, Netherlands, pp. 1-7.
  4. Diamanduros, T., Downs, E. and Jenkins, S.J. (2008). “The role of school psychologists in the assessment, prevention, and intervention of cyberbullying” Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 45, No. 8, pp. 693–704.
  5. Dinakar, K., Reichart, R. and Lieberman, H. (2011). "Modeling the Detection of Textual Cyberbullying. The Social Mobile Web", 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Eşsiz, E.S. (2016). Selecting Optimum Feature Subsets With Nature Inspired Algorithms for Cyberbully Detection, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. Gülgezen, G. (2009). Stable and Accurate Feature Selection, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul,
  6. Turkey. Hanchuan Peng, H., Fuhui Long, F. and Ding, C. (2005). “Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 1226–1238.
  7. Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J.W. (2008). “Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization” Deviant Behavior, Taylor & Francis Group, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 129–156.
  8. Kononenko, I. (1994). Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIE