Journals / Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Efficacy of bicarbonate therapy for adults with cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized‑controlled trials

Pages
24–29
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: For both acute and prolonged CPR, bicarbonate therapy might not show benefit to improve the rate of survival to hospital admission in adults with cardiac arrest.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: Because the benefits of bicarbonate therapy remain unclear, it is not routinely recommended for the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) given to individuals with cardiac arrest (CA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: Without any language restriction, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from the inception until April 30, 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: For both acute and prolonged CPR, bicarbonate therapy might not show benefit to improve the rate of survival to hospital admission in adults with cardiac arrest.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Because the benefits of bicarbonate therapy remain unclear, it is not routinely recommended for the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) given to individuals with cardiac arrest (CA). This study aims to evaluate the clinical benefits of bicarbonate therapy in adults with CA. METHODS: Without any language restriction, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL from the inception until April 30, 2020. We performed hand-search to identify the relevant trials included in previous meta-analyses. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bicarbonate and placebo treatment in adults with CA. Two authors independently assessed the trial risk of bias. The primary outcome was the survival to hospital admission. The secondary outcomes included the return of spontaneous circulation, the survival to hospital discharge, and the neurological outcome at discharge. We calculated the odds ratios of those outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel model and assessed the heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. RESULTS: Our searches found 649 unduplicated studies. Of these, three RCTs involving 1344 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The trial risk of bias ranged between fair and poor, mainly due to no blindness of outcome assessment and the selective reports of outcomes. Bicarbonate therapy showed no significant improvement in the survival to hospital admission (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–1.25). Subgroup analysis in those receiving prolonged CPR showed a similar result (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.10–8.01). No study reported the predefined secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For both acute and prolonged CPR, bicarbonate therapy might not show benefit to improve the rate of survival to hospital admission in adults with cardiac arrest.

🔖

Cite This Article

WONGTANASARASIN, W., isurapanont, K. S. (2022). Efficacy of bicarbonate therapy for adults with cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized‑controlled trials. Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online), Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 24–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/605216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kudenchuk PJ, Sandroni C, Drinhaus HR, Böttiger BW, Cariou A, Sunde K, et al. Breakthrough in cardiac arrest: Reports from the 4th Paris International Conference. Ann Intensive Care 2015;5:22
  2. Stecker EC, Reinier K, Marijon E, Narayanan K, Teodorescu C, Uy-Evanado A, et al. Public health burden of sudden cardiac death in the United States. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:212-7
  3. Duff PJ, Panchal AR, Hazinski MF. Highlights of the 2018 Focused Updates to the American Heart Association Guidelines for CPR and ECC: Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support and Pediatric Advanced Life Support. American Heart Association. Available from: https://eccguidelines.heart.org/wp-content/ uploads/2018/10/2018-Focused-Updates_Highlights.pdf. Published 2018. [Last Accessed on 2020 Apr 30]
  4. Panchal AR, Berg KM, Kudenchuk PJ, Del Rios M, Hirsch KG, Link MS, et al. American heart association focused update on advanced cardiovascular life support use of antiarrhythmic drugs during and immediately after cardiac arrest: An update to the American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2018;138:e740-9
  5. Velissaris D, Karamouzos V, Pierrakos C, Koniari I, Apostolopoulou C, Karanikolas M. Use of sodium bicarbonate in cardiac arrest: Current guidelines and literature review. J Clin Med Res 2016;8:277‑83
  6. Bar‑Joseph G, Abramson NS, Kelsey SF, Mashiach T, Craig MT, Safar P, et al. Improved resuscitation outcome in emergency medical systems with increased usage of sodium bicarbonate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:6‑15
  7. Douglas Weaver W, Fahrenbruch CE, Johnson DD, Hallstrom AP, Cobb LA, Copass MK. Effect of epinephrine and lidocaine therapy on outcome after cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 1990;82:2027‑34. Available form: https://www2. scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2‑s2.0‑0025689894&partnerI D=40&md5=85a0851162edc29e443c8971caee5c01. [Last Accessed on 2019 Sep 19]
  8. DybvikT, StrandT, SteenPA. Buffer therapy during out‑of‑hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. See comment. Resuscitation 1995;29:89-95. Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary. com/central/doi/10.1002/central/CN‑00582924/full. [Last Accessed on 2019 Sep 19]
  9. Vukmir RB, Katz L, Sodium Bicarbonate Study Group. Sodium bicarbonate improves outcome in prolonged prehospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med 2006;24:156‑61
  10. Aufderheide TP, Martin DR, Olson DW, Apr