Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6

Primary report of first documentation of mammal footprints from the late Oligocene in the Sivas Basin, Turkey

Pages
822–833
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The late Oligocene period was a time characterized by large climate changes in Anatolia; hence, it may have hosted differentecosystems and taxa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The footprints in this study, which were considered to have been made by ungulates, were discovered on mudstone that wasapproximately 5 cm thick, near an abundant mud-cracked plane located on the stratigraphic subsurface of the late Oligocene KarayünFormation, which crops out over wide areas in southern Sivas (Turkey) and has terrestrial, fluvial sediment characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These ungulatefootprints documented from the late Oligocene of the Karayün Formation in southern Sivas represent the first reported vertebrates inAnatolia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The late Oligocene period was a time characterized by large climate changes in Anatolia; hence, it may have hosted differentecosystems and taxa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The footprints in this study, which were considered to have been made by ungulates, were discovered on mudstone that wasapproximately 5 cm thick, near an abundant mud-cracked plane located on the stratigraphic subsurface of the late Oligocene KarayünFormation, which crops out over wide areas in southern Sivas (Turkey) and has terrestrial, fluvial sediment characteristics. These ungulatefootprints documented from the late Oligocene of the Karayün Formation in southern Sivas represent the first reported vertebrates inAnatolia. The footprints of three different species of ungulates were identified. The shapes, depth, and widths of the footprints providedsome basic ichnotaxonomic and TrackMaker information, but based on the poor preservation of the footprints, ichnotaxa identificationis difficult. This study aimed to use an ichnotaxonomic approach to contribute to the late Oligocene biochronology in Anatolia due tothe small amount of footprint findings in the literature. Ungulate herds left mixed footprints in wetland areas along the banks of floodingrivers. The late Oligocene period was a time characterized by large climate changes in Anatolia; hence, it may have hosted differentecosystems and taxa.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKURT, Ş. Ö., ERKMAN, A. C., MESCİ, B. L. (2022). Primary report of first documentation of mammal footprints from the late Oligocene in the Sivas Basin, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 6, 822–833. https://ajindex.com/articles/603052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abbassi N, Lucas SG, Zaare GR (2015). First report of Oligocene vertebrate footprints from Iran. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 440: 78-89.
  2. Akgün F, Kayseri MS, Akkiraz MS (2007). Palaeoclimatic evolution and vegetational changes during the Late OligoceneMiocene period in western and central Anatolia (Turkey). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 253: 56-90.
  3. Anton M, López G, Santamaria R (1993). Estudio preliminar de la icnofauna Miocena del yacimiento de Salinas de Anana (Provincia de Alava). In: Comunicaciones de las IX Jornadas de Paleontologia Malaga, pp. 23-28 (in Spanish). Anton M, López G, Santamaria R (2004). Carnivore trackways from the Miocene site of Salinas de Añana (Alava, Spain). Ichnos 11: 371-384.
  4. Artan U, Sestini G (1971). Geology of the Beypinari-Karababa area (Sivas Province). Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey 76: 72-88.
  5. Astibia H, Pereda-Suberbiola X, Payros A, Murelaga X, Berreteaga A et al. (2007). Bird and mammal footprints from the Tertiary of Navarre (western Pyrenees). Ichnos 14: 175-184.
  6. Atalay Z (1981). Çankırı (Ankara) Orta Miyoseninde Anchitherium aurelianense cuvier’in bulunması hakkında. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni 24: 75-77 (in Turkish). Becker-Platen JD, Sickenberg O, Tobien H (1975). Die Gliederung des höheren Jungtertiars und Altquartars in der Türkei nach Vertebraten ihre Redeutung für die internationale NeogeneStratigraphie. Geologische Jahrbuch 15: 1-167 (in German). Bilgiç T (2002). Sivas Sheet of the Geological Map of Turkey, 1:500 000 Scale. Ankara, Turkey: Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA). Boztuğ D (2000). S-I-A-type intrusive associations: geodynamic significance of synchronism between metamorphism and magmatism in central Anatolia, Turkey. In: In: Bozkurt E, Winchester J, Piper JA (editors). Tectonics and Magmatism in Turkey and the Surrounding Area. London, UK: Geological Society of London Special Publications, pp. 441-458.
  7. Cater JML, Hanna SS, Ries AC, Turner P (1991). Tertiary evolution of the Sivas basin, central Turkey. Tectonophysics 95: 29-46.
  8. Casanovas ML, Santafé JV (1982). Icnofauna oligocena de Agramunt (Lleida, Espana). Acta Geológica Hispánica 17: 113-119 (in Spanish). Çubuk Y, İnan S (1998). İmranlı ve Hafik Güneyinde (Sivas) Miyosen Havzasının stratigrafik ve tektonik özellikleri. MTA Dergisi 120: 45-60 (in Turkish). Demathieu G, Ginsburg L, Guérin C, Truc G (1984). Etude paléontologique, ichnologique etpal