Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5

Reassessment of the age and depositional environment of the Kırkgeçit Formation based on larger benthic foraminifera, NW Elazığ, Eastern Turkey

Pages
580–600
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the paleontological and sedimentological features, the Kırkgeçit Formation has been interpreted as a unit deposited on the inner and middle parts of a shallow ramp.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The middle-upper Eocene Kırkgeçit Formation, the fossil content of which is the subject of this study, is deposited in a back-arc basin controlled by block-faulting.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In general, Nummulites fabianii has robust test with thick walls, while Nummulites hormoensis has elongated test with thinner walls in relation to the increase of water depth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the paleontological and sedimentological features, the Kırkgeçit Formation has been interpreted as a unit deposited on the inner and middle parts of a shallow ramp.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The middle-upper Eocene Kırkgeçit Formation, the fossil content of which is the subject of this study, is deposited in a back-arc basin controlled by block-faulting. The Kırkgeçit basin is interpreted as being formed under an extensional regime related to convergence between the Anatolian plate in the north and the Arabian plate in the south. The aim of this study is to reassess the age and depositional environment of the Kırkgeçit Formation by using detailed biometric analysis data obtained from the reticulate Nummulites and determinations of other larger benthic foraminifera (LBF) in the unit. For this purpose, two sections were measured from the latest Bartonian-Priabonian aged unit. Biometric data of the Nummulites hormoensis and Nummulites fabianii from the Kırkgeçit Formation exposures in the northwest of Elazığ has been presented for the first time. In general, Nummulites fabianii has robust test with thick walls, while Nummulites hormoensis has elongated test with thinner walls in relation to the increase of water depth. The change in embryon size of these reticulate Nummulites has been considered an important indicator for evolution and biostratigraphy. Nummulites hormoensis marks latest Bartonian to early Priabonian (SBZ 18) while Nummulites fabianii is a marker for middle-late Priabonian (SBZ 19-20). The Kırkgeçit Formation in the study area was previously dated as late Lutetian-Priabonian based on LBF of it. However, by considering the LBF determined in this study, the latest Bartonian-Priabonian age was assigned to unit. Based on the paleontological and sedimentological features, the Kırkgeçit Formation has been interpreted as a unit deposited on the inner and middle parts of a shallow ramp.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYĞILI, S. (2022). Reassessment of the age and depositional environment of the Kırkgeçit Formation based on larger benthic foraminifera, NW Elazığ, Eastern Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 5, 580–600. https://ajindex.com/articles/602937

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adabi MH, Zohdi A, Ghabeishavi A, Amiri-Bakhtiyar H (2008). Applications of nummulitids and other larger benthic foraminifera in depositional environment and sequence stratigraphy: an example from the Eocene deposits in Zagros Basin, SW Iran. Facies 54: 499-512. doi: 10.1007/s10347-008-0151-7
  2. Aksoy E, Türkmen İ, Turan M (2005). Tectonics and sedimentation in convergent margin basins: an example from the Tertiary Elazığ Basin, Eastern Turkey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 25: 459-472.
  3. Avşar N (1983). Elazığ yakın kuzeybatısında stratigrafik ve mikropaleontolojik araştırmalar. PhD, Fırat University, Elazığ, Turkey (in Turkish). Avşar N (1991). Presence of Nummulites fabianii (Prever) group (Nummulites ex. gr. fabianii) and associated foraminifers in the Elazığ region. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 112: 71-76.
  4. Avşar N (1996). Inner platform sediments with Praebullalveolina afyonica Sirel and Acar around Elazığ Region (E. Turkey). Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 118: 9-14.
  5. Banerjee S, Khanolkar S, Saraswati PK (2018). Facies and depositional settings of the middle Eocene-Oligocene carbonates in Kutch. Geodinamica Acta 30 (1): 119-136.
  6. Beavington-Penney SJ, Racey A (2004). Ecology of extant nummulitids and other larger benthic foraminifera: Applications in palaeoenvironmental analysis. Earth Science Reviews 67: 219-265.
  7. Beyarslan M, Bingöl AF (2018). Zircon U-Pb age and geochemical constraints on the origin and tectonic implications of late Cretaceous intra-oceanic arc magmatics in the Southeast Anatolian Orogenic Belt (SE-Turkey). Journal of African Earth Sciences 147: 477-497.
  8. Briguglio A, Hohenegger J (2009). Nummulitids hydrodynamics: an example using Nummulites globulus Leymerie, 1846. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 48 (2): 105-111. Colombié C, Strasser A (2005). Facies, cycles, and controls on the evolution of a keep-up carbonate platform (Kimmeridgian, Swiss Jura). Sedimentology 52: 1207-1227. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 3091.2005.00736.x Costa E, Garcés M, López-Blanco M, Serra-Kiel J, Bernaola G et al. (2013). The Bartonian-Priabonian marine record of the Eastern South Pyrenean Foreland Basin (Ne Spain): A new calibration of the larger foraminifers and calcareous nannofossil biozonation. Geologica Acta 11 (2): 177-193. doi: 10.1344/105.000001779 Cotton LJ, Pearson PN, Renema W (2015). A new Eocene lineage of reticulate Nummulites (Foraminifera) from Kilwa district, Tanzania; a place for Nummulites ptukhi