Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Determination of recent tectonic deformations along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone in Central Anatolia (Turkey) with GNSS observations

Pages
20–33
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that the active deformation in the TGFZ is greater than previously expressed compared to the slip rates calculated in previous studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Tuz Gölü Fault Zone (TGFZ) is one of the most important active tectonic structures of Central Anatolia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The morphotectonic features of the TGFZ and the distribution of the epicenters of earthquakes over magnitude 5.0 show that this fault zone remains active today.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that the active deformation in the TGFZ is greater than previously expressed compared to the slip rates calculated in previous studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Tuz Gölü Fault Zone (TGFZ) is one of the most important active tectonic structures of Central Anatolia. The morphotectonic features of the TGFZ and the distribution of the epicenters of earthquakes over magnitude 5.0 show that this fault zone remains active today. In this study, the deformation of the TGFZ is determined with high sensitivity using geodetic measurements. To obtain accurate information about the deformation of the TGFZ, 24 GNSS sites and two continuously operating reference stations were constructed in the southern part of the TGFZ. Between 2018 and 2020, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) measurements were made on this network. The data of the Turkish National Fundamental GPS Network (TNFGN) and the continuously operating reference stations-Turkey (CORS-TR) sites around the study area were also included in the study, and GNSS measurements were evaluated with the GAMIT/GLOBK software, and velocity fields of the region were determined. In addition, block modeling of the study area was calculated using the GeodSuit software. For the first time, slip rates provided by the geodetic network are established directly on the TGFZ segments, filling a significant deficiency in the literature, contributing to understanding the tectonics of the country and the region, and providing an important dataset for evaluating the degree of seismic activity of the fault zone. The slip rates obtained within the scope of this study are approximately 1.8 mm/yr strike-slip and 2 mm/yr dip-slip for the Acıpınar and Helvadere segments on that Aksaray city is built on. These results indicate that the active deformation in the TGFZ is greater than previously expressed compared to the slip rates calculated in previous studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKERCİN, S., ERDOĞAN, H., GÜRBÜZ, E., GÜNDÜZ, H. İ., AKTUĞ, B., BİLGİLİOĞLU, S. S., TİRYAKİOĞLU, İ., ORHAN, O., GEZGİN, C., TORUN, A. T., OKTAR, O., TÜRKMEN, C., KAYA, E. (2022). Determination of recent tectonic deformations along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone in Central Anatolia (Turkey) with GNSS observations. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 20–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/602892

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aktug B, Nocquet JM, Cingöz A, Parsons B, Erkan Y et al. (2009). Deformation of western Turkey from a combination of permanent and campaign GPS data: Limits to block-like behavior. Journal of Geophysical Research 114 (B10). doi: 10.1029/2008jb006000 Aktug B, Kaypak B, Çelik RN (2010). Source parameters of 03 February 2002
  2. Çay earthquake, Mw 6.6 and aftershocks from GPS data, southwestern Turkey. Journal of Seismology 14: 445- 456. Aktug B, Parmaksız E, Kurt M, Lenk O, Kılıçoglu A et al. (2013). Deformation of Central Anatolia: GPS implications. Journal of Geodynamics 67: 78-96.
  3. Aktug B, Özener H, Doğru A, Sabuncu A, Turgut B et al. (2016). Slip rates and seismic potential on the east anatolian fault system using an improved GPS velocity field. Journal of Geodynamics 94–95: 1–12.
  4. Aktug B, Tiryakioğlu İ, Sözbilir H, Özener H, Özkaymak Ç et al. (2021). GPS Derived Finite Source Mechanism of the 30 October 2020
  5. Samos Earthquake, Mw=6.9 in Aegean extensional region. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 30: 718- 737. doi: 10.3906/yer-2101-18
  6. Aydan Ö (2000). A new stress inference method for the stress state of Earth’s crust and its application. Yerbilimleri 22: 223-236.
  7. Beekman PH (1966). The pliocene and quaternary volcanism in the Hasan Dağ-melendiz dağ region. MTA Bulletin 66: 90-105.
  8. Bozkurt E (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey - A synthesis. Geodinamica Acta 14 (1-3): 3-30.
  9. Burgmann R, Ayhan ME, Fielding EJ, Wright TJ, McClusky S et al. (2002). Deformation during the 12 November 1999
  10. Düzce, Turkey Earthquake, from GPS and InSAR Data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92 (1): 161-171.
  11. Çemen İ, Göncüoğlu MC, Dirik K (1999). Structural evolution of the Tuzgölü basin in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Geologys 107: 693-706.
  12. Çiner A, Aydar E, Dirik K, Rojay B, Özsayın E, Ersoy O, Çubukçu E, Kutluay A, Yıldırım, C (2011). Vertical Anatolian Movement Project (VAMP), TÜBİTAK Project No: 107Y333 Derman AS, Rojay B, Güney H, Yıldız M (2000). Koçhisar-Aksaray fay zonu’nun evrimi hakkında yeni veriler, Haymana-TuzgölüUlukışla basenlerinin uygulamalı çalışması. Bildiri Özetleri, 1, Aksaray (in Turkish). Derman AS, Rojay B, Güney H, Yıldız M (2003). Koçhisar-Aksaray fay zonu’nun evrimi hakkında yeni veriler. Türkiye Petrol Jeologları Derneği Haymana-Tuzgölü-Ulukışla Basenleri Uygulamalı Çalışma-2001 (in Turkish). Dirik K, Erol O (2000). Tuzgölü ve civarının tektonomorfolojik evrimi Orta Anadolu, Türkiye Haymana-Tuzgölü-Ulukışla Basenleri Uygulamalı Çalışma (