Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Skill assessment of a high resolution (1/72 degree) Black Sea ocean model

Pages
235–246
Publication Date
2022-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the model is capable of simulating daily mean SSHA with an RMSE value of 1.2 cm.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The skill of a high-resolution Black Sea circulation model (ROMS) is assessed using the available satellite and field data for Sea Surface Height Anomaly (SSHA), Sea Surface Temperature, and CTD profiles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The model is configured to simulate the 9-year period between 2012 and 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the model is capable of simulating daily mean SSHA with an RMSE value of 1.2 cm.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The skill of a high-resolution Black Sea circulation model (ROMS) is assessed using the available satellite and field data for Sea Surface Height Anomaly (SSHA), Sea Surface Temperature, and CTD profiles. The model is configured to simulate the 9-year period between 2012 and 2021. The model’s skill is assessed using standard analytical methods for error calculation such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and correlation. Additionally, the model results are assessed using several more recent methods such as the relative operating characteristic (ROC). The results show that the model is capable of simulating daily mean SSHA with an RMSE value of 1.2 cm. When the mean monthly SSHA values are considered, the RMSE drops down to 0.7 cm. The biggest source of the error for SSHA is found to be related to the freshwater balance, as the Black Sea is a freshwater-dominated marine environment. The results for SST show that the model is able to capture both the daily and seasonal variation with high correlation values. The correlation coefficient for basin averaged SST over the entire simulation period compared to the satellite-based OISST data is calculated as 0.98, and the RMSE value is 1.6 °C. In addition to the surface comparisons obtained from SSHA and SST, the model results are compared to 2300 Argo Float CTD profiles. The RMSE is 1.1 °C for the temperature profiles and 0.7 PSU for the salinity over the entire water column. The methods used to assess the skill of the model show that the model is quite capable of simulation of oceanic conditions within the Black Sea. As one of the aims of this model’s development is to simulate mesoscale-to-sub-mesoscale eddies, results on the model’s capabilities show that it can simulate eddies successfully from 5 – 50 km eddies in the Black Sea.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUTAK, B. (2022). Skill assessment of a high resolution (1/72 degree) Black Sea ocean model. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 235–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/602880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. ltiok H, Kayişoğlu M (2015). Seasonal and interannual variability of water exchange in the Strait of Istanbul. Mediterranean Marine Science 16 (3): 644-655. doi: 10.12681/mms.1225 Becker JJ, Sandwell DT, Smith WHF, Braud J, Binder B et al. (2009). Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30_PLUS. Marine Geodesy 32 (4): 355-371. doi: 10.1080/01490410903297766 Capet A, Barth A, Beckers JM, Marilaure G (2012). Interannual variability of Black Sea’s hydrodynamics and connection to atmospheric patterns. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 77: 128-142. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.04.010 Capet A, Stanev EV, Beckers JM, Murray JW, Gregoire M (2016). Decline of the Black Sea oxygen inventory. Biogeosciences 13 (4): 1287–1297. doi: 10.5194/bg-13-1287-2016
  2. Chelton DB, Schlax MG, Samelson RM (2011). Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Progress in Oceanography 91 (2): 167–216. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2011.01.002 Enriquez CE, Shapiro GI, Souza AJ, Zatsepin AG (2005). Hydrodynamic modelling of mesoscale eddies in the Black Sea. Ocean Dynamics 55 (5–6): 476–489. doi: 10.1007/s10236-005-0031-4
  3. Fichaut M, Garcia MJ, Giorgetti A, Iona A, Kuznetsov A et al. (2003). MEDAR/MEDATLAS 2002: A Mediterranean and Black Sea database for operational oceanography. Elsevier Oceanography Series 69: 645-648. doi: 10.1016/S0422-9894(03)80107-1
  4. Grayek S, Stanev EV, Kandilarov R (2010). On the response of Black Sea level to external forcing: Altimeter data and numerical modelling. Ocean Dynamics 60 (1): 123-140. doi: 10.1007/s10236-009-0249- 7 Gunduz M, Özsoy E, Hordoir R (2020). A model of Black Sea circulation with strait exchange (2008-2018). Geoscientific Model Development 13 (1): 121–138. doi: 10.5194/gmd-13-121-2020
  5. Jarosz E, Teague WJ, Book JW, Besiktepe S (2011). Observed volume fluxes in the Bosphorus Strait. Geophysical Research Letters 38 (21): 1–6. doi: 10.1029/2011GL049557 Kara AB, Wallcraft AJ, Hurlburt HE (2005). Sea surface temperature sensitivity to water turbidity from simulations of the turbid Black Sea using HYCOM. Journal of Physical Oceanography 35 (1): 33–54. doi: 10.1175/JPO-2656.1 Kara AB, Wallcraft AJ, Hurlburt HE, Stanev EV (2008). Air–sea fluxes and river discharges in the Black Sea with a focus on the Danube and Bosphorus. Journal of Marine Systems 74 (1-2): 74-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.11.010 Korotenko KA, Bowman MJ, Dietrich DE (2010). High-resolution numerical model for predicting the transpor